Cargando…
Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India
OBJECTIVES: To assess the difficulties faced by the pregnant women in seeking appropriate antenatal care due to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic; assess the difficulties encountered during delivery and postpartum period; the suitability of the teleconsultation services offered;...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059701 |
_version_ | 1784682690926084096 |
---|---|
author | Goyal, Lajya Devi Garg, Priyanka Verma, Madhur Kaur, Navdeep Bakshi, Dapinder Arora, Jatinder |
author_facet | Goyal, Lajya Devi Garg, Priyanka Verma, Madhur Kaur, Navdeep Bakshi, Dapinder Arora, Jatinder |
author_sort | Goyal, Lajya Devi |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the difficulties faced by the pregnant women in seeking appropriate antenatal care due to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic; assess the difficulties encountered during delivery and postpartum period; the suitability of the teleconsultation services offered; effect of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes and the effect of restrictions on the nutrition profile of the pregnant women. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included 1374 pregnant women from the rural areas of three districts of Punjab, India registered at government health centres before the implementation of lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on 24 March 2020. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difficulties faced by the women during their pregnancies due to restrictions imposed during the lockdown. The secondary outcomes included the effect of COVID-19 infections on pregnancy outcomes, satisfaction from the telemedicine services and restrictions on the nutrition profile of the pregnant women. RESULTS: One-third of the women (38.4%) considered their last pregnancy unplanned. Women faced difficulties due to the restrictions in getting adequate nutrition (76.5%), accessing transportation facilities (35.4%), consultations from doctors (22.4%) or getting an ultrasonography scan (48.7%). One-fifth (21.9%) of women could not access safe abortion services. Only 3.6% of respondents ever took any teleconsultation services offered by the government. Most of them felt unsatisfied compared with routine visits (77.5%). COVID-19-infected women were primarily asymptomatic (76.1%), but there was a high incidence of preterm birth (42.8%). Frontline workers could visit 64.3% of the women in the postpartum period despite restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lockdown compromised the antenatal care in our study area while the frontline workers attempted to minimise the inconvenience. Telemedicine services did not prove to be of many benefits to pregnant women and should only work as a supplement to the existing protocols of antenatal care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8987212 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89872122022-04-07 Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India Goyal, Lajya Devi Garg, Priyanka Verma, Madhur Kaur, Navdeep Bakshi, Dapinder Arora, Jatinder BMJ Open Obstetrics and Gynaecology OBJECTIVES: To assess the difficulties faced by the pregnant women in seeking appropriate antenatal care due to the restrictions imposed during the COVID-19 pandemic; assess the difficulties encountered during delivery and postpartum period; the suitability of the teleconsultation services offered; effect of COVID-19 infection on pregnancy outcomes and the effect of restrictions on the nutrition profile of the pregnant women. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We included 1374 pregnant women from the rural areas of three districts of Punjab, India registered at government health centres before the implementation of lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic on 24 March 2020. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the difficulties faced by the women during their pregnancies due to restrictions imposed during the lockdown. The secondary outcomes included the effect of COVID-19 infections on pregnancy outcomes, satisfaction from the telemedicine services and restrictions on the nutrition profile of the pregnant women. RESULTS: One-third of the women (38.4%) considered their last pregnancy unplanned. Women faced difficulties due to the restrictions in getting adequate nutrition (76.5%), accessing transportation facilities (35.4%), consultations from doctors (22.4%) or getting an ultrasonography scan (48.7%). One-fifth (21.9%) of women could not access safe abortion services. Only 3.6% of respondents ever took any teleconsultation services offered by the government. Most of them felt unsatisfied compared with routine visits (77.5%). COVID-19-infected women were primarily asymptomatic (76.1%), but there was a high incidence of preterm birth (42.8%). Frontline workers could visit 64.3% of the women in the postpartum period despite restrictions. CONCLUSIONS: Lockdown compromised the antenatal care in our study area while the frontline workers attempted to minimise the inconvenience. Telemedicine services did not prove to be of many benefits to pregnant women and should only work as a supplement to the existing protocols of antenatal care. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8987212/ /pubmed/35387835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059701 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics and Gynaecology Goyal, Lajya Devi Garg, Priyanka Verma, Madhur Kaur, Navdeep Bakshi, Dapinder Arora, Jatinder Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title | Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title_full | Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title_fullStr | Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title_short | Effect of restrictions imposed due to COVID-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural North India |
title_sort | effect of restrictions imposed due to covid-19 pandemic on the antenatal care and pregnancy outcomes: a prospective observational study from rural north india |
topic | Obstetrics and Gynaecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987212/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387835 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059701 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goyallajyadevi effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia AT gargpriyanka effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia AT vermamadhur effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia AT kaurnavdeep effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia AT bakshidapinder effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia AT arorajatinder effectofrestrictionsimposedduetocovid19pandemicontheantenatalcareandpregnancyoutcomesaprospectiveobservationalstudyfromruralnorthindia |