Cargando…

Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order

BACKGROUND: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights.  The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how fa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wergeland, Nina Camilla, Fause, Åshild, Weber, Astrid Karine, Fause, Anett Beatrix Osnes, Riley, Henriette
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07892-9
_version_ 1784682703629582336
author Wergeland, Nina Camilla
Fause, Åshild
Weber, Astrid Karine
Fause, Anett Beatrix Osnes
Riley, Henriette
author_facet Wergeland, Nina Camilla
Fause, Åshild
Weber, Astrid Karine
Fause, Anett Beatrix Osnes
Riley, Henriette
author_sort Wergeland, Nina Camilla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights.  The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how far the new legislation has enabled them to be involved in decisions on their treatment after they were assessed as capable of giving consent and had their community treatment order (CTO) revoked due to the change in the legislation. METHOD: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted from September 2019 to March 2020 with twelve people with experience as CTO patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis inspired by hermeneutics. RESULTS: Almost all interviewees were receiving the same health care over two years after their CTO was terminated. Following the new legislation, they found it easier to be involved in treatment decisions when off a CTO than they had done in periods without a CTO before the amendment. Being assessed as having capacity to consent had enhanced their autonomy, their dialogues and their feeling of being respected in encounters with health care personnel. However, several participants felt insecure in such encounters and some still felt passive and lacking in initiative due to their previous experiences of coercion. They were worried about becoming acutely ill and again being subjected to involuntary treatment. CONCLUSION: The introduction of capacity-based mental health legislation seems to have fulfilled the intention that treatment and care should, as far as possible, be provided in accordance with patients’ wishes. Systematic assessment of capacity to consent seems to increase the focus on patients’ condition, level of functioning and opinions in care and treatment. Stricter requirements for health care providers to find solutions in cooperation with patients seem to lead to new forms of collaboration between patients and health care personnel, where patients have become more active participants in their own treatment and receive help to make more informed choices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8987267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89872672022-04-07 Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order Wergeland, Nina Camilla Fause, Åshild Weber, Astrid Karine Fause, Anett Beatrix Osnes Riley, Henriette BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: Capacity-based mental health legislation was introduced in Norway on 1 September 2017. The aim was to increase the autonomy of patients with severe mental illness and to bring mental health care in line with human rights.  The aim of this study is to explore patient experiences of how far the new legislation has enabled them to be involved in decisions on their treatment after they were assessed as capable of giving consent and had their community treatment order (CTO) revoked due to the change in the legislation. METHOD: Individual in-depth interviews were conducted from September 2019 to March 2020 with twelve people with experience as CTO patients. Interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis inspired by hermeneutics. RESULTS: Almost all interviewees were receiving the same health care over two years after their CTO was terminated. Following the new legislation, they found it easier to be involved in treatment decisions when off a CTO than they had done in periods without a CTO before the amendment. Being assessed as having capacity to consent had enhanced their autonomy, their dialogues and their feeling of being respected in encounters with health care personnel. However, several participants felt insecure in such encounters and some still felt passive and lacking in initiative due to their previous experiences of coercion. They were worried about becoming acutely ill and again being subjected to involuntary treatment. CONCLUSION: The introduction of capacity-based mental health legislation seems to have fulfilled the intention that treatment and care should, as far as possible, be provided in accordance with patients’ wishes. Systematic assessment of capacity to consent seems to increase the focus on patients’ condition, level of functioning and opinions in care and treatment. Stricter requirements for health care providers to find solutions in cooperation with patients seem to lead to new forms of collaboration between patients and health care personnel, where patients have become more active participants in their own treatment and receive help to make more informed choices. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8987267/ /pubmed/35392904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07892-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wergeland, Nina Camilla
Fause, Åshild
Weber, Astrid Karine
Fause, Anett Beatrix Osnes
Riley, Henriette
Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title_full Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title_fullStr Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title_full_unstemmed Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title_short Increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in Norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
title_sort increased autonomy with capacity-based mental health legislation in norway: a qualitative study of patient experiences of having come off a community treatment order
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07892-9
work_keys_str_mv AT wergelandninacamilla increasedautonomywithcapacitybasedmentalhealthlegislationinnorwayaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesofhavingcomeoffacommunitytreatmentorder
AT fauseashild increasedautonomywithcapacitybasedmentalhealthlegislationinnorwayaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesofhavingcomeoffacommunitytreatmentorder
AT weberastridkarine increasedautonomywithcapacitybasedmentalhealthlegislationinnorwayaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesofhavingcomeoffacommunitytreatmentorder
AT fauseanettbeatrixosnes increasedautonomywithcapacitybasedmentalhealthlegislationinnorwayaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesofhavingcomeoffacommunitytreatmentorder
AT rileyhenriette increasedautonomywithcapacitybasedmentalhealthlegislationinnorwayaqualitativestudyofpatientexperiencesofhavingcomeoffacommunitytreatmentorder