Cargando…

‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia

INTRODUCTION: Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) are vital to ensure accountability and for making decisions including for tracking the Sustainable Development Goals. The Ethiopia Health Sector Transformation Plan II includes preventing data falsification as a major strategic initiative an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Estifanos, Abiy Seifu, Gezahegn, Rediet, Keraga, Dorka Woldesenbet, Kifle, Abiyou, Procureur, Fanny, Hill, Zelee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008260
_version_ 1784682795644223488
author Estifanos, Abiy Seifu
Gezahegn, Rediet
Keraga, Dorka Woldesenbet
Kifle, Abiyou
Procureur, Fanny
Hill, Zelee
author_facet Estifanos, Abiy Seifu
Gezahegn, Rediet
Keraga, Dorka Woldesenbet
Kifle, Abiyou
Procureur, Fanny
Hill, Zelee
author_sort Estifanos, Abiy Seifu
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) are vital to ensure accountability and for making decisions including for tracking the Sustainable Development Goals. The Ethiopia Health Sector Transformation Plan II includes preventing data falsification as a major strategic initiative and our study aimed to explore the reasons why healthcare providers intentionally falsify maternal and newborn health (MNH) data in two regions of Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in two hospitals, four health centres and their associated health posts in Oromia and Amhara regions. We conducted 45 in-depth interviews with health facility managers, quality improvement (QI) focal persons, health information technicians, MNH care providers, Health Extension Workers and QI mentors. Data were collected in local languages and transcribed in English. During analysis we repeatedly read the transcripts, coded them inductively using NVivo V.12, and categorised the codes into themes. RESULTS: Participants were hesitant to report personal data falsification but many reported that falsification is common and that they had experienced it in other facilities or had been told about it by other health workers. Falsification was mostly inflating the number of services provided (such as deliveries). Decreasing the number of deaths or reclassifying neonatal death into stillbirths was also reported. An overarching theme was that the health system focuses on, and rewards, the number of services provided over any other metric. This focus led to both system and individual level incentives for falsification and disincentives for accurate reporting. CONCLUSION: Our finding suggests that to reduce facility level data falsification policy makers might consider disentangling reward and punishments from the performance reports based on the routine HMIS data. Further studies examining the high-level drivers of falsification at regional, national and global levels and effective interventions to address the drivers of data falsification are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8987673
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89876732022-04-22 ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia Estifanos, Abiy Seifu Gezahegn, Rediet Keraga, Dorka Woldesenbet Kifle, Abiyou Procureur, Fanny Hill, Zelee BMJ Glob Health Original Research INTRODUCTION: Health Management Information Systems (HMIS) are vital to ensure accountability and for making decisions including for tracking the Sustainable Development Goals. The Ethiopia Health Sector Transformation Plan II includes preventing data falsification as a major strategic initiative and our study aimed to explore the reasons why healthcare providers intentionally falsify maternal and newborn health (MNH) data in two regions of Ethiopia. METHODS: We conducted a qualitative study in two hospitals, four health centres and their associated health posts in Oromia and Amhara regions. We conducted 45 in-depth interviews with health facility managers, quality improvement (QI) focal persons, health information technicians, MNH care providers, Health Extension Workers and QI mentors. Data were collected in local languages and transcribed in English. During analysis we repeatedly read the transcripts, coded them inductively using NVivo V.12, and categorised the codes into themes. RESULTS: Participants were hesitant to report personal data falsification but many reported that falsification is common and that they had experienced it in other facilities or had been told about it by other health workers. Falsification was mostly inflating the number of services provided (such as deliveries). Decreasing the number of deaths or reclassifying neonatal death into stillbirths was also reported. An overarching theme was that the health system focuses on, and rewards, the number of services provided over any other metric. This focus led to both system and individual level incentives for falsification and disincentives for accurate reporting. CONCLUSION: Our finding suggests that to reduce facility level data falsification policy makers might consider disentangling reward and punishments from the performance reports based on the routine HMIS data. Further studies examining the high-level drivers of falsification at regional, national and global levels and effective interventions to address the drivers of data falsification are needed. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8987673/ /pubmed/35387770 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008260 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Estifanos, Abiy Seifu
Gezahegn, Rediet
Keraga, Dorka Woldesenbet
Kifle, Abiyou
Procureur, Fanny
Hill, Zelee
‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title_full ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title_fullStr ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title_short ‘The false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in Ethiopia
title_sort ‘the false reporter will get a praise and the one who reported truth will be discouraged’: a qualitative study on intentional data falsification by frontline maternal and newborn healthcare workers in two regions in ethiopia
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987673/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387770
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2021-008260
work_keys_str_mv AT estifanosabiyseifu thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia
AT gezahegnrediet thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia
AT keragadorkawoldesenbet thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia
AT kifleabiyou thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia
AT procureurfanny thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia
AT hillzelee thefalsereporterwillgetapraiseandtheonewhoreportedtruthwillbediscouragedaqualitativestudyonintentionaldatafalsificationbyfrontlinematernalandnewbornhealthcareworkersintworegionsinethiopia