Cargando…

Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire

OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the validity and reliability of a tool measuring patient experiences with patient safety in ambulatory care that is suitable for routine use in general practitioner and specialist practices. DESIGN: Instrument development was based on a literature review, a 3-round Del...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Stahl, Katja, Reisinger, Anna, Groene, Oliver
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049237
_version_ 1784682821415075840
author Stahl, Katja
Reisinger, Anna
Groene, Oliver
author_facet Stahl, Katja
Reisinger, Anna
Groene, Oliver
author_sort Stahl, Katja
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the validity and reliability of a tool measuring patient experiences with patient safety in ambulatory care that is suitable for routine use in general practitioner and specialist practices. DESIGN: Instrument development was based on a literature review, a 3-round Delphi survey with a multidisciplinary expert panel and cognitive interviews with patients. The instrument was piloted in 22 practices using a cross-sectional survey. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to test construct validity. Internal consistency and the ability of the questionnaire to differentiate between selected subgroups and at the level of individual practices was examined. SETTING: General practitioner and specialist practices. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged >18 years seeking care in ambulatory care practices between February and June 2020. RESULTS: The final ASK-ME-questionnaire consisted of 22 items covering 5 theoretical dimensions. A total of 3042 patients (71.1%) completed the questionnaire. Median item non-response rate was 4.2% (IQR 3.4%–4.7%). EFA yielded 3 factors comprising 14 items explaining 64.8% of the variance representing contributing factors to patient safety incidents. CFA confirmed the factorial structure suggested by EFA. The model fit the data satisfactorily (comparative fit index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.08, standardised root mean square residual=0.08). Internal consistency values ranged from 0.7 to 0.9. Discriminant validity was supported by significant differences between patients of different age and differences in self-reported health status. The factors distinguished well between practices. CONCLUSION: The ASK-ME-questionnaire showed good psychometric properties. It is suitable for routine use in patient safety measurement and improvement systems in ambulatory care. Further research is required to adequately assess number and type of experienced events in routine measurements.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8987793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89877932022-04-22 Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire Stahl, Katja Reisinger, Anna Groene, Oliver BMJ Open Health Services Research OBJECTIVE: To develop and test the validity and reliability of a tool measuring patient experiences with patient safety in ambulatory care that is suitable for routine use in general practitioner and specialist practices. DESIGN: Instrument development was based on a literature review, a 3-round Delphi survey with a multidisciplinary expert panel and cognitive interviews with patients. The instrument was piloted in 22 practices using a cross-sectional survey. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were performed to test construct validity. Internal consistency and the ability of the questionnaire to differentiate between selected subgroups and at the level of individual practices was examined. SETTING: General practitioner and specialist practices. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged >18 years seeking care in ambulatory care practices between February and June 2020. RESULTS: The final ASK-ME-questionnaire consisted of 22 items covering 5 theoretical dimensions. A total of 3042 patients (71.1%) completed the questionnaire. Median item non-response rate was 4.2% (IQR 3.4%–4.7%). EFA yielded 3 factors comprising 14 items explaining 64.8% of the variance representing contributing factors to patient safety incidents. CFA confirmed the factorial structure suggested by EFA. The model fit the data satisfactorily (comparative fit index=0.92, root mean square error of approximation=0.08, standardised root mean square residual=0.08). Internal consistency values ranged from 0.7 to 0.9. Discriminant validity was supported by significant differences between patients of different age and differences in self-reported health status. The factors distinguished well between practices. CONCLUSION: The ASK-ME-questionnaire showed good psychometric properties. It is suitable for routine use in patient safety measurement and improvement systems in ambulatory care. Further research is required to adequately assess number and type of experienced events in routine measurements. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8987793/ /pubmed/35387804 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049237 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Stahl, Katja
Reisinger, Anna
Groene, Oliver
Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title_full Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title_fullStr Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title_full_unstemmed Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title_short Assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ASK-ME-questionnaire
title_sort assessing patient experience with patient safety in primary care: development and validation of the ask-me-questionnaire
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387804
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049237
work_keys_str_mv AT stahlkatja assessingpatientexperiencewithpatientsafetyinprimarycaredevelopmentandvalidationoftheaskmequestionnaire
AT reisingeranna assessingpatientexperiencewithpatientsafetyinprimarycaredevelopmentandvalidationoftheaskmequestionnaire
AT groeneoliver assessingpatientexperiencewithpatientsafetyinprimarycaredevelopmentandvalidationoftheaskmequestionnaire