Cargando…
Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel
BACKGROUND: Heel ulcer of diabetic foot (DF) is a difficulty in clinical repair. The current study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the medial plantar island flap (MPIF) and the sural nerve nutritional artery island flap (SNNAIF) for the repair of chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) on t...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402595 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-293 |
_version_ | 1784682835856064512 |
---|---|
author | Zhou, Kailong Zhu, Zhenhua Zuo, Zhicheng Zhao, Jiaju |
author_facet | Zhou, Kailong Zhu, Zhenhua Zuo, Zhicheng Zhao, Jiaju |
author_sort | Zhou, Kailong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Heel ulcer of diabetic foot (DF) is a difficulty in clinical repair. The current study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the medial plantar island flap (MPIF) and the sural nerve nutritional artery island flap (SNNAIF) for the repair of chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) on the heel. METHODS: Twelve patients with chronic DFU on the heel were admitted to our department from August 2018 to August 2020. Upon admission, ulcer debridement and bone cement filling were performed for 2–3 weeks to control infection. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower limb was performed to assess vascular status. Then, 5 patients were repaired with MPIF and 7 patients with SNNAIF. RESULTS: The MPIF survived completely in 5 cases; SNNAIF was used in 7 cases, and 6 cases survived completely. Meanwhile, 1 patient who underwent SNNAIF presented with partial necrosis of the distal end of the flap. Then, it healed after debridement and dressing changes. All 12 flaps were followed up for 6–12 months. The flaps had a soft texture, and their shape was satisfactory. In 2 cases, SNNAIFs re-ruptured 8 months after surgery. However, they healed after dressing changes and weight-bearing reduction. During the 10-month follow-up, the sensory recovery of MPIF in 5 cases was satisfactory because the flap contained medial plantar cutaneous nerve. Meanwhile, 7 patients who underwent SNNAIF repair had poor sensory recovery. All patients had good dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of the ankle with satisfactory function. CONCLUSIONS: Both the MPIF and SNNAIF flaps had a high survival rate and are feasible for DFU repair with good clinical outcomes. If DSA or CTA shows that the medial plantar artery is unobstructed and the heel wound is small, MPIF can retain sensory function and wear resistance. It is the first choice for repairing diabetic foot ulcers on the heel. If the heel wound are large or DSA or CTA shows that the posterior tibial artery is occluded and the peroneal artery is unobstructed, SNNAIF repair is safer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8987865 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89878652022-04-08 Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel Zhou, Kailong Zhu, Zhenhua Zuo, Zhicheng Zhao, Jiaju Ann Transl Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Heel ulcer of diabetic foot (DF) is a difficulty in clinical repair. The current study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of the medial plantar island flap (MPIF) and the sural nerve nutritional artery island flap (SNNAIF) for the repair of chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) on the heel. METHODS: Twelve patients with chronic DFU on the heel were admitted to our department from August 2018 to August 2020. Upon admission, ulcer debridement and bone cement filling were performed for 2–3 weeks to control infection. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the lower limb was performed to assess vascular status. Then, 5 patients were repaired with MPIF and 7 patients with SNNAIF. RESULTS: The MPIF survived completely in 5 cases; SNNAIF was used in 7 cases, and 6 cases survived completely. Meanwhile, 1 patient who underwent SNNAIF presented with partial necrosis of the distal end of the flap. Then, it healed after debridement and dressing changes. All 12 flaps were followed up for 6–12 months. The flaps had a soft texture, and their shape was satisfactory. In 2 cases, SNNAIFs re-ruptured 8 months after surgery. However, they healed after dressing changes and weight-bearing reduction. During the 10-month follow-up, the sensory recovery of MPIF in 5 cases was satisfactory because the flap contained medial plantar cutaneous nerve. Meanwhile, 7 patients who underwent SNNAIF repair had poor sensory recovery. All patients had good dorsiflexion and plantarflexion of the ankle with satisfactory function. CONCLUSIONS: Both the MPIF and SNNAIF flaps had a high survival rate and are feasible for DFU repair with good clinical outcomes. If DSA or CTA shows that the medial plantar artery is unobstructed and the heel wound is small, MPIF can retain sensory function and wear resistance. It is the first choice for repairing diabetic foot ulcers on the heel. If the heel wound are large or DSA or CTA shows that the posterior tibial artery is occluded and the peroneal artery is unobstructed, SNNAIF repair is safer. AME Publishing Company 2022-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8987865/ /pubmed/35402595 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-293 Text en 2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhou, Kailong Zhu, Zhenhua Zuo, Zhicheng Zhao, Jiaju Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title | Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title_full | Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title_short | Efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
title_sort | efficacy of two different types of island flaps for the repair of diabetic foot ulcers on the heel |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8987865/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402595 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/atm-22-293 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhoukailong efficacyoftwodifferenttypesofislandflapsfortherepairofdiabeticfootulcersontheheel AT zhuzhenhua efficacyoftwodifferenttypesofislandflapsfortherepairofdiabeticfootulcersontheheel AT zuozhicheng efficacyoftwodifferenttypesofislandflapsfortherepairofdiabeticfootulcersontheheel AT zhaojiaju efficacyoftwodifferenttypesofislandflapsfortherepairofdiabeticfootulcersontheheel |