Cargando…
Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review
BACKGROUND: Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine curre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac031 |
_version_ | 1784682871113383936 |
---|---|
author | Wells, Cameron I. Xu, William Penfold, James A. Keane, Celia Gharibans, Armen A. Bissett, Ian P. O’Grady, Greg |
author_facet | Wells, Cameron I. Xu, William Penfold, James A. Keane, Celia Gharibans, Armen A. Bissett, Ian P. O’Grady, Greg |
author_sort | Wells, Cameron I. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine current methods and wearable devices used for monitoring after abdominal surgery and identify knowledge gaps requiring further investigation. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies of wearable devices for monitoring of adult patients within 30 days after abdominal surgery were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 78 articles from 65 study cohorts, with 5153 patients were included. Thirty-one different wearable devices were used to measure vital signs, physiological measurements, or physical activity. The duration of postoperative wearable device use ranged from 15 h to 3 months after surgery. Studies mostly focused on physical activity metrics (71.8 per cent). Continuous vital sign measurement and physical activity tracking both showed promise for detecting postoperative complications earlier than usual care, but conclusions were limited by poor device precision, adherence, occurrence of false alarms, data transmission problems, and retrospective data analysis. Devices were generally well accepted by patients, with high levels of acceptance, comfort, and safety. CONCLUSION: Wearable technology has not yet realized its potential to improve postoperative monitoring. Further work is needed to overcome technical limitations, improve precision, and reduce false alarms. Prospective assessment of efficacy, using an intention-to-treat approach should be the focus of further studies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89880142022-04-07 Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review Wells, Cameron I. Xu, William Penfold, James A. Keane, Celia Gharibans, Armen A. Bissett, Ian P. O’Grady, Greg BJS Open Systematic Review BACKGROUND: Wearable devices have been proposed as a novel method for monitoring patients after surgery to track recovery, identify complications early, and improve surgical safety. Previous studies have used a heterogeneous range of devices, methods, and analyses. This review aimed to examine current methods and wearable devices used for monitoring after abdominal surgery and identify knowledge gaps requiring further investigation. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted given the heterogeneous nature of the evidence. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases were systematically searched. Studies of wearable devices for monitoring of adult patients within 30 days after abdominal surgery were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: A total of 78 articles from 65 study cohorts, with 5153 patients were included. Thirty-one different wearable devices were used to measure vital signs, physiological measurements, or physical activity. The duration of postoperative wearable device use ranged from 15 h to 3 months after surgery. Studies mostly focused on physical activity metrics (71.8 per cent). Continuous vital sign measurement and physical activity tracking both showed promise for detecting postoperative complications earlier than usual care, but conclusions were limited by poor device precision, adherence, occurrence of false alarms, data transmission problems, and retrospective data analysis. Devices were generally well accepted by patients, with high levels of acceptance, comfort, and safety. CONCLUSION: Wearable technology has not yet realized its potential to improve postoperative monitoring. Further work is needed to overcome technical limitations, improve precision, and reduce false alarms. Prospective assessment of efficacy, using an intention-to-treat approach should be the focus of further studies. Oxford University Press 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8988014/ /pubmed/35388891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac031 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Society Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Wells, Cameron I. Xu, William Penfold, James A. Keane, Celia Gharibans, Armen A. Bissett, Ian P. O’Grady, Greg Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title | Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title_full | Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title_fullStr | Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title_short | Wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
title_sort | wearable devices to monitor recovery after abdominal surgery: scoping review |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988014/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35388891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrac031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wellscameroni wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT xuwilliam wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT penfoldjamesa wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT keanecelia wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT gharibansarmena wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT bissettianp wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview AT ogradygreg wearabledevicestomonitorrecoveryafterabdominalsurgeryscopingreview |