Cargando…

How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions

EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is spars...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kathage, Jonas, Smit, Bert, Janssens, Bas, Haagsma, Wiepie, Adrados, Jose Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier Ltd 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016
_version_ 1784682918720831488
author Kathage, Jonas
Smit, Bert
Janssens, Bas
Haagsma, Wiepie
Adrados, Jose Luis
author_facet Kathage, Jonas
Smit, Bert
Janssens, Bas
Haagsma, Wiepie
Adrados, Jose Luis
author_sort Kathage, Jonas
collection PubMed
description EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is sparse and has yielded few relevant insights into CCC adoption behaviour by farmers. In this study we analyse a dataset from farm surveys in four EU regions to better understand the role of policy and non-policy factors in CCC adoption. Our data suggests that adoption rates vary widely between regions, while farm adoption intensities are low. We find that policy is by far the strongest determinant of adoption rates and adoption intensities. CCC adoption patterns have been shaped mainly by the Nitrates Directive and the Common Agricultural Policy's greening requirements. Agronomic motives are a third but much weaker impetus for adoption. Environmental and climate change considerations do not play a significant role in farmers' adoption decisions. Most non-adopters would likely become adopters if stronger policy obligations or additional subsidies were implemented. Non-adopters‘ responsiveness to subsidies and willingness to accept is highly varied but only weakly predictable from easily observed farm characteristics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89882422022-05-17 How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions Kathage, Jonas Smit, Bert Janssens, Bas Haagsma, Wiepie Adrados, Jose Luis Land use policy Article EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is sparse and has yielded few relevant insights into CCC adoption behaviour by farmers. In this study we analyse a dataset from farm surveys in four EU regions to better understand the role of policy and non-policy factors in CCC adoption. Our data suggests that adoption rates vary widely between regions, while farm adoption intensities are low. We find that policy is by far the strongest determinant of adoption rates and adoption intensities. CCC adoption patterns have been shaped mainly by the Nitrates Directive and the Common Agricultural Policy's greening requirements. Agronomic motives are a third but much weaker impetus for adoption. Environmental and climate change considerations do not play a significant role in farmers' adoption decisions. Most non-adopters would likely become adopters if stronger policy obligations or additional subsidies were implemented. Non-adopters‘ responsiveness to subsidies and willingness to accept is highly varied but only weakly predictable from easily observed farm characteristics. Elsevier Ltd 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8988242/ /pubmed/35592408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kathage, Jonas
Smit, Bert
Janssens, Bas
Haagsma, Wiepie
Adrados, Jose Luis
How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title_full How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title_fullStr How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title_full_unstemmed How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title_short How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
title_sort how much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? evidence from four eu regions
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592408
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016
work_keys_str_mv AT kathagejonas howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions
AT smitbert howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions
AT janssensbas howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions
AT haagsmawiepie howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions
AT adradosjoseluis howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions