Cargando…
How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions
EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is spars...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016 |
_version_ | 1784682918720831488 |
---|---|
author | Kathage, Jonas Smit, Bert Janssens, Bas Haagsma, Wiepie Adrados, Jose Luis |
author_facet | Kathage, Jonas Smit, Bert Janssens, Bas Haagsma, Wiepie Adrados, Jose Luis |
author_sort | Kathage, Jonas |
collection | PubMed |
description | EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is sparse and has yielded few relevant insights into CCC adoption behaviour by farmers. In this study we analyse a dataset from farm surveys in four EU regions to better understand the role of policy and non-policy factors in CCC adoption. Our data suggests that adoption rates vary widely between regions, while farm adoption intensities are low. We find that policy is by far the strongest determinant of adoption rates and adoption intensities. CCC adoption patterns have been shaped mainly by the Nitrates Directive and the Common Agricultural Policy's greening requirements. Agronomic motives are a third but much weaker impetus for adoption. Environmental and climate change considerations do not play a significant role in farmers' adoption decisions. Most non-adopters would likely become adopters if stronger policy obligations or additional subsidies were implemented. Non-adopters‘ responsiveness to subsidies and willingness to accept is highly varied but only weakly predictable from easily observed farm characteristics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89882422022-05-17 How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions Kathage, Jonas Smit, Bert Janssens, Bas Haagsma, Wiepie Adrados, Jose Luis Land use policy Article EU agriculture is facing increasing expectations and pressure from society and policymakers to support environmental protection and climate change mitigation. Catch and cover crops (CCC) are an underused farming practice that can potentially contribute towards these goals. Previous research is sparse and has yielded few relevant insights into CCC adoption behaviour by farmers. In this study we analyse a dataset from farm surveys in four EU regions to better understand the role of policy and non-policy factors in CCC adoption. Our data suggests that adoption rates vary widely between regions, while farm adoption intensities are low. We find that policy is by far the strongest determinant of adoption rates and adoption intensities. CCC adoption patterns have been shaped mainly by the Nitrates Directive and the Common Agricultural Policy's greening requirements. Agronomic motives are a third but much weaker impetus for adoption. Environmental and climate change considerations do not play a significant role in farmers' adoption decisions. Most non-adopters would likely become adopters if stronger policy obligations or additional subsidies were implemented. Non-adopters‘ responsiveness to subsidies and willingness to accept is highly varied but only weakly predictable from easily observed farm characteristics. Elsevier Ltd 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8988242/ /pubmed/35592408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kathage, Jonas Smit, Bert Janssens, Bas Haagsma, Wiepie Adrados, Jose Luis How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title | How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title_full | How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title_fullStr | How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title_full_unstemmed | How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title_short | How much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? Evidence from four EU regions |
title_sort | how much is policy driving the adoption of cover crops? evidence from four eu regions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35592408 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kathagejonas howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions AT smitbert howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions AT janssensbas howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions AT haagsmawiepie howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions AT adradosjoseluis howmuchispolicydrivingtheadoptionofcovercropsevidencefromfoureuregions |