Cargando…
THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles
BACKGROUND: Over-consumption is a common adverse outcome from cannabis edibles. States such as Colorado require each serving of cannabis edible to carry a THC symbol. This study aimed to test whether packaging edibles in separate servings and/or indicating the THC level per serving improves consumer...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-022-00124-1 |
_version_ | 1784682951314767872 |
---|---|
author | Goodman, Samantha Hammond, David |
author_facet | Goodman, Samantha Hammond, David |
author_sort | Goodman, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Over-consumption is a common adverse outcome from cannabis edibles. States such as Colorado require each serving of cannabis edible to carry a THC symbol. This study aimed to test whether packaging edibles in separate servings and/or indicating the THC level per serving improves consumer understanding of serving size. METHODS: An 3 × 2 experimental task was conducted as part of the 2019 International Cannabis Policy Study online survey. Respondents from Canada and the US (n = 45,504) were randomly assigned to view an image of a chocolate cannabis edible. Packages displayed THC labels according to 1 of 6 experimental conditions: packaging (3 levels: whole multi-serving bar; individual chocolate squares; separately packaged squares) and THC stamp (2 levels: stamp on each square vs. no stamp). Logistic regression tested the effect of packaging and THC stamp on odds of correctly identifying a standard serving, among edible consumers and non-consumers separately. Edible consumers were also asked about their awareness of a standard THC serving. RESULTS: Only 14.6% of edible consumers reported knowing the standard serving of THC for cannabis edibles. In the experimental task, among non-consumers who saw stamped bars, the multi-serving bar (AOR = 1.16 (1.08, 1.24) p < 0.001) and individually packaged squares (AOR = 1.08 (1.01, 1.16), p = 0.031) elicited more correct responses than individual squares. There was no difference in packaging formats when stamps were absent (p > 0.05 for all). Among edible consumers, there was no effect of the packaging (p = 0.992) or stamp manipulation (p = 0.988). Among both edible consumers and non-consumers, respondents in US states with legal recreational cannabis performed better than Canadians (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Regulations that require THC information to be stamped or indicated on each serving of cannabis edible may facilitate understanding of how much to consume, especially among novice consumers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-022-00124-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89883942022-04-08 THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles Goodman, Samantha Hammond, David J Cannabis Res Brief Research Report BACKGROUND: Over-consumption is a common adverse outcome from cannabis edibles. States such as Colorado require each serving of cannabis edible to carry a THC symbol. This study aimed to test whether packaging edibles in separate servings and/or indicating the THC level per serving improves consumer understanding of serving size. METHODS: An 3 × 2 experimental task was conducted as part of the 2019 International Cannabis Policy Study online survey. Respondents from Canada and the US (n = 45,504) were randomly assigned to view an image of a chocolate cannabis edible. Packages displayed THC labels according to 1 of 6 experimental conditions: packaging (3 levels: whole multi-serving bar; individual chocolate squares; separately packaged squares) and THC stamp (2 levels: stamp on each square vs. no stamp). Logistic regression tested the effect of packaging and THC stamp on odds of correctly identifying a standard serving, among edible consumers and non-consumers separately. Edible consumers were also asked about their awareness of a standard THC serving. RESULTS: Only 14.6% of edible consumers reported knowing the standard serving of THC for cannabis edibles. In the experimental task, among non-consumers who saw stamped bars, the multi-serving bar (AOR = 1.16 (1.08, 1.24) p < 0.001) and individually packaged squares (AOR = 1.08 (1.01, 1.16), p = 0.031) elicited more correct responses than individual squares. There was no difference in packaging formats when stamps were absent (p > 0.05 for all). Among edible consumers, there was no effect of the packaging (p = 0.992) or stamp manipulation (p = 0.988). Among both edible consumers and non-consumers, respondents in US states with legal recreational cannabis performed better than Canadians (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Regulations that require THC information to be stamped or indicated on each serving of cannabis edible may facilitate understanding of how much to consume, especially among novice consumers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42238-022-00124-1. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8988394/ /pubmed/35387681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-022-00124-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Brief Research Report Goodman, Samantha Hammond, David THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title | THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title_full | THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title_fullStr | THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title_full_unstemmed | THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title_short | THC labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling THC servings on cannabis edibles |
title_sort | thc labeling on cannabis products: an experimental study of approaches for labeling thc servings on cannabis edibles |
topic | Brief Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35387681 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s42238-022-00124-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goodmansamantha thclabelingoncannabisproductsanexperimentalstudyofapproachesforlabelingthcservingsoncannabisedibles AT hammonddavid thclabelingoncannabisproductsanexperimentalstudyofapproachesforlabelingthcservingsoncannabisedibles |