Cargando…
Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China
BACKGROUND: The reliability of Criteria for Assessing Prescription Quality in Chinese Hospitals (CAPQCH) has never been rigorously verified. This study was designed to verify the reliability of the CAPQCH among pharmacists in China. METHODS: Fourteen pharmacists, 5 from hospitals and 9 from the comm...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07854-1 |
_version_ | 1784682954299015168 |
---|---|
author | Tan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jun Gu, Dongshi Ran, San Gu, Tongtong Lin, Xiaowen Tao, Enxiang Asakawa, Tetsuya Fang, Huan |
author_facet | Tan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jun Gu, Dongshi Ran, San Gu, Tongtong Lin, Xiaowen Tao, Enxiang Asakawa, Tetsuya Fang, Huan |
author_sort | Tan, Xiaofang |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The reliability of Criteria for Assessing Prescription Quality in Chinese Hospitals (CAPQCH) has never been rigorously verified. This study was designed to verify the reliability of the CAPQCH among pharmacists in China. METHODS: Fourteen pharmacists, 5 from hospitals and 9 from the communities were recruited. We randomly selected 200 prescriptions, and made the testing prescriptions including appropriate and inappropriate testing prescriptions. Pharmacists assessed these testing prescriptions according to criteria in CAPQCH. Three test sets (Set 1, Set 2, and Set 3) were evaluated at 6-month intervals. Before administration of Set 3, pharmacists were informed that achievement on Set 3 would be reflected in their performance appraisal. We also evaluated the performance based on prescription comments before and after combining several confusing criteria. Cohen’s Kappa statistic, Fleiss’ Kappa statistic, and accuracy were employed to evaluate reliability among pharmacists. RESULTS: Median values of Cohen’s Kappa were 0.61 in Set 1, 0.66 in Set 2, and 0.80 in Set 3; reliability is thus substantial. Our data indicate no significant differences between Set 1 and Set 2, whereas Set 3 indicates significantly improved performance. Moreover, combinations of confusing criteria contributed little to improvement of performance in prescription comments. CONCLUSION: Our results verified the reliability of CAPQCH application by working pharmacists. Adding performance based on prescription comments to personal appraisals was effective in improving the quality of prescription comments. These findings may be useful when future modification of the CAPQCH is considered. Moreover, this study contributes to improving the understanding of the prescription assessment situation in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07854-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89884082022-04-08 Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China Tan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jun Gu, Dongshi Ran, San Gu, Tongtong Lin, Xiaowen Tao, Enxiang Asakawa, Tetsuya Fang, Huan BMC Health Serv Res Research BACKGROUND: The reliability of Criteria for Assessing Prescription Quality in Chinese Hospitals (CAPQCH) has never been rigorously verified. This study was designed to verify the reliability of the CAPQCH among pharmacists in China. METHODS: Fourteen pharmacists, 5 from hospitals and 9 from the communities were recruited. We randomly selected 200 prescriptions, and made the testing prescriptions including appropriate and inappropriate testing prescriptions. Pharmacists assessed these testing prescriptions according to criteria in CAPQCH. Three test sets (Set 1, Set 2, and Set 3) were evaluated at 6-month intervals. Before administration of Set 3, pharmacists were informed that achievement on Set 3 would be reflected in their performance appraisal. We also evaluated the performance based on prescription comments before and after combining several confusing criteria. Cohen’s Kappa statistic, Fleiss’ Kappa statistic, and accuracy were employed to evaluate reliability among pharmacists. RESULTS: Median values of Cohen’s Kappa were 0.61 in Set 1, 0.66 in Set 2, and 0.80 in Set 3; reliability is thus substantial. Our data indicate no significant differences between Set 1 and Set 2, whereas Set 3 indicates significantly improved performance. Moreover, combinations of confusing criteria contributed little to improvement of performance in prescription comments. CONCLUSION: Our results verified the reliability of CAPQCH application by working pharmacists. Adding performance based on prescription comments to personal appraisals was effective in improving the quality of prescription comments. These findings may be useful when future modification of the CAPQCH is considered. Moreover, this study contributes to improving the understanding of the prescription assessment situation in China. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-022-07854-1. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8988408/ /pubmed/35392907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07854-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Tan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jun Gu, Dongshi Ran, San Gu, Tongtong Lin, Xiaowen Tao, Enxiang Asakawa, Tetsuya Fang, Huan Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title | Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title_full | Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title_short | Evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in Chinese hospitals among pharmacists in China |
title_sort | evaluation of the reliability of the criteria for assessing prescription quality in chinese hospitals among pharmacists in china |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392907 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-07854-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tanxiaofang evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT zhangjun evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT gudongshi evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT ransan evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT gutongtong evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT linxiaowen evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT taoenxiang evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT asakawatetsuya evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina AT fanghuan evaluationofthereliabilityofthecriteriaforassessingprescriptionqualityinchinesehospitalsamongpharmacistsinchina |