Cargando…

Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant

PURPOSE: Despite advances in treatments for COVID-19, a subset of patients develop end stage lung disease, necessitating lung transplantation. However, COVID-19 ARDS often requires prolonged intubation with sedation and paralytics, resulting in profound deconditioning. As such, extracorporeal membra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pasupneti, S., Tulu, Z., Rao, V., MacArthur, J.W., Mooney, J.J., Dhillon, G.S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988582/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.309
_version_ 1784682993541971968
author Pasupneti, S.
Tulu, Z.
Rao, V.
MacArthur, J.W.
Mooney, J.J.
Dhillon, G.S.
author_facet Pasupneti, S.
Tulu, Z.
Rao, V.
MacArthur, J.W.
Mooney, J.J.
Dhillon, G.S.
author_sort Pasupneti, S.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Despite advances in treatments for COVID-19, a subset of patients develop end stage lung disease, necessitating lung transplantation. However, COVID-19 ARDS often requires prolonged intubation with sedation and paralytics, resulting in profound deconditioning. As such, extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) is a useful bridge to transplant to allow for a wakeful state and facilitate rehab. This study compares outcomes among patients with COVID-19 and nonCOVID-19 lung disease placed on ECMO as a bridge to transplant. METHODS: All patients on veno-venous ECMO prior to lung transplantation at a single center from Jan 2020 - Oct 2021 were identified. Patient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes were abstracted for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were identified in the COVID-19 (C) cohort and 11 in the nonCOVID-19 (NC) cohort. Age and LAS at transplant were similar (Table 1). As expected, total duration on ECMO was longer for C cohort patients (85.4 vs 14.5 days). Patients in the C cohort had longer ischemia times and more returns to the OR within 72 hours of transplant (71% vs 45%). Rates of hemodialysis within 30 days of transplant were lower in the C cohort (14% vs 18%). Further, C cohort patients had higher rates of detectable donor specific antibodies by IgG (71% vs 55%), though all were negative by C1q and compatible cross matches. While total and ICU lengths of stay were longer in the C cohort, this group had a shorter post-transplant hospital length of stay. Median time post-transplant was 212 days for the C cohort and 154 days for the NC cohort; survival was 100% for both groups at follow up. CONCLUSION: For patients with COVID-19 ARDS, ECMO is a useful bridge to transplant to mitigate complications associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. These preliminary data suggest prolonged periods of ECMO pre-transplant do not result in significant adverse events post-transplant. Additional analyses of graft function and survival at 6 and 12 months are ongoing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988582
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89885822022-04-11 Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant Pasupneti, S. Tulu, Z. Rao, V. MacArthur, J.W. Mooney, J.J. Dhillon, G.S. J Heart Lung Transplant (288) PURPOSE: Despite advances in treatments for COVID-19, a subset of patients develop end stage lung disease, necessitating lung transplantation. However, COVID-19 ARDS often requires prolonged intubation with sedation and paralytics, resulting in profound deconditioning. As such, extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) is a useful bridge to transplant to allow for a wakeful state and facilitate rehab. This study compares outcomes among patients with COVID-19 and nonCOVID-19 lung disease placed on ECMO as a bridge to transplant. METHODS: All patients on veno-venous ECMO prior to lung transplantation at a single center from Jan 2020 - Oct 2021 were identified. Patient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes were abstracted for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 7 patients were identified in the COVID-19 (C) cohort and 11 in the nonCOVID-19 (NC) cohort. Age and LAS at transplant were similar (Table 1). As expected, total duration on ECMO was longer for C cohort patients (85.4 vs 14.5 days). Patients in the C cohort had longer ischemia times and more returns to the OR within 72 hours of transplant (71% vs 45%). Rates of hemodialysis within 30 days of transplant were lower in the C cohort (14% vs 18%). Further, C cohort patients had higher rates of detectable donor specific antibodies by IgG (71% vs 55%), though all were negative by C1q and compatible cross matches. While total and ICU lengths of stay were longer in the C cohort, this group had a shorter post-transplant hospital length of stay. Median time post-transplant was 212 days for the C cohort and 154 days for the NC cohort; survival was 100% for both groups at follow up. CONCLUSION: For patients with COVID-19 ARDS, ECMO is a useful bridge to transplant to mitigate complications associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation. These preliminary data suggest prolonged periods of ECMO pre-transplant do not result in significant adverse events post-transplant. Additional analyses of graft function and survival at 6 and 12 months are ongoing. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022-04 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8988582/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.309 Text en Copyright © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle (288)
Pasupneti, S.
Tulu, Z.
Rao, V.
MacArthur, J.W.
Mooney, J.J.
Dhillon, G.S.
Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title_full Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title_fullStr Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title_short Comparing Outcomes of COVID-19 vs NonCOVID-19 Lung Transplant Recipients on ECMO as a Bridge to Transplant
title_sort comparing outcomes of covid-19 vs noncovid-19 lung transplant recipients on ecmo as a bridge to transplant
topic (288)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988582/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.309
work_keys_str_mv AT pasupnetis comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant
AT tuluz comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant
AT raov comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant
AT macarthurjw comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant
AT mooneyjj comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant
AT dhillongs comparingoutcomesofcovid19vsnoncovid19lungtransplantrecipientsonecmoasabridgetotransplant