Cargando…

The United States Experience of Lung Transplantation in Recipients with COVID-19 Fibrosis: A UNOS/OPTN Analysis

PURPOSE: Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) is a novel cause of end-stage fibrotic lung disease. Data has been limited to case series and single center reports with regards to outcomes in this unique cohort of patients. We sought to investigate the largest experience to date in patients with COVID-19...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phan, D.K., Friedmann, P., Skendelas, J.P., Mansour, A., Borgi, J., Alsunaid, S., Abbasi, M., Forest, S.J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988585/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.255
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) is a novel cause of end-stage fibrotic lung disease. Data has been limited to case series and single center reports with regards to outcomes in this unique cohort of patients. We sought to investigate the largest experience to date in patients with COVID-19 fibrosis (CVF) who underwent lung transplantation. METHODS: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was queried for all adult patients (≥18 years old) who underwent isolated lung transplantation between 2018 and July 2021. Recipients diagnosed with CVF were identified and compared to those with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). The IPF cohort included recipients from 2018, in the pre-COVID era. Baseline demographics, perioperative factors, and 30-day outcomes were examined. RESULTS: A total of 931 recipients were included in this study, 868 (93.2%) and 63 (6.8%) were IPF and CVF, respectively. IPF recipients were on average older (65 vs. 56 years, p<0.001), white race (83% vs. 51%, p<0.001), and less likely to be male (73% vs. 86%, p=0.04). BMI was similar between the IPF and CVF, 27.6 and 27.2 kg/m(2), as was the mean PAP 24 and 21 mmHg. The CVF cohort had lower predicted FVC (32% vs. 47%, p=0.01), and had less tobacco use (36% vs 61%, p<0.001). Mean creatinine level was clinically similar, though statistically higher in the IPF cohort, (0.83 vs 0.64, p<0.001). CVF recipients were on the waitlist for a shorter median duration (10 vs 32 days, p<0.001) with a higher LAS (85 vs 41, p<0.001). Notably, more CVF recipient were be on ECMO at time of listing (29% vs 2%, p<0.001) and require ventilatory support (27% vs. 2%, p<0.001). CVF recipients were more likely to receive a double lung transplantation compared to IPF (83% vs 64%, p=0.002), with similar ischemia times, 5.5 vs 5.1 hrs (p=0.17). Mortality at 30 days was comparable between CVF and IPF (7.0% vs. 2.3%, p=0.09), though 20 patients in the CVF cohort had missing data. CONCLUSION: Patients with end-stage lung disease secondary to CVF are higher acuity, and more likely to require ECMO and ventilatory support as a bridge to lung transplantation. Early mortality, while comparable to non-COVID related fibrotic lung disease, remains almost 3 times higher with CVF. In the era of publicly reported survival outcomes, the transplant community may need to reconsider how we approach this new and devastating diagnosis of CVF.