Cargando…
Lung Transplant for Patients with COVID-19 Bridged with VV ECMO: Initial Experience
PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been used extensively for respiratory failure refractory to conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) and rescue maneuvers. However, the worldwide experience with COVID-19 patients undergoing lung tra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988694/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.01.1213 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: During the COVID-19 pandemic, veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VV ECMO) has been used extensively for respiratory failure refractory to conventional mechanical ventilation (MV) and rescue maneuvers. However, the worldwide experience with COVID-19 patients undergoing lung transplant (LTx) with pre-LTx VV ECMO support is limited. Therefore, we sought to report our institution's early experience with COVID-19 patients who underwent LTx after VV ECMO. METHODS: We retrospectively identified 5 COVID-19 patients who underwent LTx after VV ECMO support. Patients were required to have a negative nasopharyngeal swab and a negative bronchoalveolar lavage for COVID-19 prior to LTx listing. We analyzed preoperative and operative characteristics, details of VV ECMO support and early post-transplant outcomes. RESULTS: The mean age of our cohort was 50 years (range 39-57 years) and all patients were male. Mean recipient BMI was 30 (range 22-37). Mean duration of VV ECMO pre-Ltx was 60 days (range 44-72 days). At the time of the LTx operation, 60% (3/5) of patients were on VV ECMO, 20% (1/5) were on mechanical ventilation (MV), and 20% (1/5) were on supplemental oxygen only. Preoperatively, 80% (4/5) had acute kidney injury and 20% (2/5) were on dialysis. LTx was performed via clamshell approach with intraoperative venoaterial ECMO support in all cases. For 60% (3/5) patients, VV ECMO support was continued after LTx and discontinued on postoperative days 0, 1 and 6, respectively. All-cause mortality was 40% (2/5), related to sepsis and multi-organ failure, and both deaths occurred an average of 115 days post-LTx. Mean length of stay for surviving patients was 59 days (range 22-117). In the first 3 months postop-LTx, grade A2 acute cellular rejection was noted in 2 patients, A1 in 2 patients, and antibody-mediated rejection in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: Our early experience with LTx for COVID-19 patients supported with VV ECMO support is notable for 1) prolonged VV-ECMO duration and significant morbidity pre-LTx, and 2) early mortalities related to sepsis and multiple organ failure. These data highlight a uniquely complex patient population that carries high risk of multi-organ failure and other comorbidities dictating careful selection for transplant. |
---|