Cargando…
Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78 |
_version_ | 1784683032270077952 |
---|---|
author | Silagy, A. W. Young, R. Kelly, B. D. Reeves, F. Furrer, M. Costello, A. J. Challacombe, B. J. Corcoran, N. M. Kearsley, J. Dundee, P. Agarwal, D. K. |
author_facet | Silagy, A. W. Young, R. Kelly, B. D. Reeves, F. Furrer, M. Costello, A. J. Challacombe, B. J. Corcoran, N. M. Kearsley, J. Dundee, P. Agarwal, D. K. |
author_sort | Silagy, A. W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the sliding‐clip technique at teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, including surgical approach, RENAL Nephrometry Score, and post‐operative outcomes, including Clavien‐Dindo classification of complications, were recorded for 76 consecutive cases. We compared perioperative and 90‐day events with patient and tumor characteristics, stratified by operative approach and case complexity, using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for continuous variables and the Chi‐squared or Fisher's exact test, for binary and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Open surgery (n = 15) reduced ischemia time and operative time, but increased hospital admission time. Pre‐ and post‐operative estimated glomerular filtration rates did not change significantly by operative approach. Older patients (P = .007) and open surgery (P = .003) were associated with a higher rate of complications (any‐grade). Six grade ≥3 complications occurred: these were associated with higher RENAL Nephrometry Score (P = .016) and higher pathological tumor stage (P = .045). Limits include smaller case volumes which incorporate the learning curve cases; therefore, these data are most applicable to lower volume teaching hospitals. CONCLUSION: The sliding‐clip technique for partial nephrectomy was first described by Agarwal et al and has low complication rates, acceptable operative time, and preserves renal function across open and minimally invasive surgeries. This series encompasses the initial learning curve with developing the technique through to present‐day emergence as a routine standard of practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988750 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89887502022-04-25 Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort Silagy, A. W. Young, R. Kelly, B. D. Reeves, F. Furrer, M. Costello, A. J. Challacombe, B. J. Corcoran, N. M. Kearsley, J. Dundee, P. Agarwal, D. K. BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the sliding‐clip technique at teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, including surgical approach, RENAL Nephrometry Score, and post‐operative outcomes, including Clavien‐Dindo classification of complications, were recorded for 76 consecutive cases. We compared perioperative and 90‐day events with patient and tumor characteristics, stratified by operative approach and case complexity, using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for continuous variables and the Chi‐squared or Fisher's exact test, for binary and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Open surgery (n = 15) reduced ischemia time and operative time, but increased hospital admission time. Pre‐ and post‐operative estimated glomerular filtration rates did not change significantly by operative approach. Older patients (P = .007) and open surgery (P = .003) were associated with a higher rate of complications (any‐grade). Six grade ≥3 complications occurred: these were associated with higher RENAL Nephrometry Score (P = .016) and higher pathological tumor stage (P = .045). Limits include smaller case volumes which incorporate the learning curve cases; therefore, these data are most applicable to lower volume teaching hospitals. CONCLUSION: The sliding‐clip technique for partial nephrectomy was first described by Agarwal et al and has low complication rates, acceptable operative time, and preserves renal function across open and minimally invasive surgeries. This series encompasses the initial learning curve with developing the technique through to present‐day emergence as a routine standard of practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8988750/ /pubmed/35475136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Silagy, A. W. Young, R. Kelly, B. D. Reeves, F. Furrer, M. Costello, A. J. Challacombe, B. J. Corcoran, N. M. Kearsley, J. Dundee, P. Agarwal, D. K. Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title | Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title_full | Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title_fullStr | Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title_short | Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort |
title_sort | surgical innovation revisited: a historical narrative of the minimally invasive “agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an australian cohort |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988750/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silagyaw surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT youngr surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT kellybd surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT reevesf surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT furrerm surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT costelloaj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT challacombebj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT corcorannm surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT kearsleyj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT dundeep surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort AT agarwaldk surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort |