Cargando…

Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silagy, A. W., Young, R., Kelly, B. D., Reeves, F., Furrer, M., Costello, A. J., Challacombe, B. J., Corcoran, N. M., Kearsley, J., Dundee, P., Agarwal, D. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78
_version_ 1784683032270077952
author Silagy, A. W.
Young, R.
Kelly, B. D.
Reeves, F.
Furrer, M.
Costello, A. J.
Challacombe, B. J.
Corcoran, N. M.
Kearsley, J.
Dundee, P.
Agarwal, D. K.
author_facet Silagy, A. W.
Young, R.
Kelly, B. D.
Reeves, F.
Furrer, M.
Costello, A. J.
Challacombe, B. J.
Corcoran, N. M.
Kearsley, J.
Dundee, P.
Agarwal, D. K.
author_sort Silagy, A. W.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the sliding‐clip technique at teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, including surgical approach, RENAL Nephrometry Score, and post‐operative outcomes, including Clavien‐Dindo classification of complications, were recorded for 76 consecutive cases. We compared perioperative and 90‐day events with patient and tumor characteristics, stratified by operative approach and case complexity, using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for continuous variables and the Chi‐squared or Fisher's exact test, for binary and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Open surgery (n = 15) reduced ischemia time and operative time, but increased hospital admission time. Pre‐ and post‐operative estimated glomerular filtration rates did not change significantly by operative approach. Older patients (P = .007) and open surgery (P = .003) were associated with a higher rate of complications (any‐grade). Six grade ≥3 complications occurred: these were associated with higher RENAL Nephrometry Score (P = .016) and higher pathological tumor stage (P = .045). Limits include smaller case volumes which incorporate the learning curve cases; therefore, these data are most applicable to lower volume teaching hospitals. CONCLUSION: The sliding‐clip technique for partial nephrectomy was first described by Agarwal et al and has low complication rates, acceptable operative time, and preserves renal function across open and minimally invasive surgeries. This series encompasses the initial learning curve with developing the technique through to present‐day emergence as a routine standard of practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988750
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89887502022-04-25 Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort Silagy, A. W. Young, R. Kelly, B. D. Reeves, F. Furrer, M. Costello, A. J. Challacombe, B. J. Corcoran, N. M. Kearsley, J. Dundee, P. Agarwal, D. K. BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To evaluate local clinical outcomes of sliding clip renorrhaphy, from inception to current utilization for open, laparoscopic, and robotically assisted partial nephrectomy. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively maintained databases of three surgeons performing partial nephrectomies with the sliding‐clip technique at teaching hospitals between 2005 and 2019. Baseline characteristics, operative parameters, including surgical approach, RENAL Nephrometry Score, and post‐operative outcomes, including Clavien‐Dindo classification of complications, were recorded for 76 consecutive cases. We compared perioperative and 90‐day events with patient and tumor characteristics, stratified by operative approach and case complexity, using Wilcoxon rank‐sum test for continuous variables and the Chi‐squared or Fisher's exact test, for binary and categorical variables, respectively. RESULTS: Open surgery (n = 15) reduced ischemia time and operative time, but increased hospital admission time. Pre‐ and post‐operative estimated glomerular filtration rates did not change significantly by operative approach. Older patients (P = .007) and open surgery (P = .003) were associated with a higher rate of complications (any‐grade). Six grade ≥3 complications occurred: these were associated with higher RENAL Nephrometry Score (P = .016) and higher pathological tumor stage (P = .045). Limits include smaller case volumes which incorporate the learning curve cases; therefore, these data are most applicable to lower volume teaching hospitals. CONCLUSION: The sliding‐clip technique for partial nephrectomy was first described by Agarwal et al and has low complication rates, acceptable operative time, and preserves renal function across open and minimally invasive surgeries. This series encompasses the initial learning curve with developing the technique through to present‐day emergence as a routine standard of practice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-03-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8988750/ /pubmed/35475136 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Silagy, A. W.
Young, R.
Kelly, B. D.
Reeves, F.
Furrer, M.
Costello, A. J.
Challacombe, B. J.
Corcoran, N. M.
Kearsley, J.
Dundee, P.
Agarwal, D. K.
Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title_full Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title_fullStr Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title_full_unstemmed Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title_short Surgical innovation revisited: A historical narrative of the minimally invasive “Agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an Australian cohort
title_sort surgical innovation revisited: a historical narrative of the minimally invasive “agarwal sliding‐clip renorrhaphy” technique for partial nephrectomy and its application to an australian cohort
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988750/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475136
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.78
work_keys_str_mv AT silagyaw surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT youngr surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT kellybd surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT reevesf surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT furrerm surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT costelloaj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT challacombebj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT corcorannm surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT kearsleyj surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT dundeep surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort
AT agarwaldk surgicalinnovationrevisitedahistoricalnarrativeoftheminimallyinvasiveagarwalslidingcliprenorrhaphytechniqueforpartialnephrectomyanditsapplicationtoanaustraliancohort