Cargando…

The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of age on overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), rates of therapeutic intervention (TI), and quality of life (QOL) in active surveillance (AS) prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and five consecutive, prospectively...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merrick, Gregory S., Rohmann, Gabe, Galbreath, Robert, Scholl, Whitney, Fiano, Ryan, Bennett, Abbey, Butler, Wayne M., Adamovich, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.52
_version_ 1784683035122204672
author Merrick, Gregory S.
Rohmann, Gabe
Galbreath, Robert
Scholl, Whitney
Fiano, Ryan
Bennett, Abbey
Butler, Wayne M.
Adamovich, Edward
author_facet Merrick, Gregory S.
Rohmann, Gabe
Galbreath, Robert
Scholl, Whitney
Fiano, Ryan
Bennett, Abbey
Butler, Wayne M.
Adamovich, Edward
author_sort Merrick, Gregory S.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of age on overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), rates of therapeutic intervention (TI), and quality of life (QOL) in active surveillance (AS) prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and five consecutive, prospectively evaluated AS patients who underwent a staging transperineal template‐guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) prior to enrollment on AS were evaluated and stratified by age. Evaluated outcomes included OS, FDM, TI, and QOL to include urinary, bowel, sexual function, and depression. Post void residual (PVR) urine measurements were also followed. Repeat biopsy was based on PSA kinetics, abnormal digital rectal examination or patient preference. RESULTS: Of the 305 patients, 290 (95.1%) were Gleason 3 + 3 and 15 patients (4.9%) were Gleason 3 + 4. The median follow‐up was 5.5 years (range 1‐14 years). At 10 years, TI was 0%, 1.0%, and 11.4% for patients ≤59, 60‐69, and ≥70 years of age (P < .001). No patient has developed distant metastasis. The median time to TI was 4.71 years. No statistical differences in urinary function, bowel function, or depression were noted. Potency preservation was dependent on patient age. CONCLUSION: Within the confines of the follow‐up of our series, younger patients were less likely to proceed to therapeutic intervention. In addition, patient age did not adversely impact QOL outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988763
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89887632022-04-25 The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients Merrick, Gregory S. Rohmann, Gabe Galbreath, Robert Scholl, Whitney Fiano, Ryan Bennett, Abbey Butler, Wayne M. Adamovich, Edward BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of age on overall survival (OS), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), rates of therapeutic intervention (TI), and quality of life (QOL) in active surveillance (AS) prostate cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundred and five consecutive, prospectively evaluated AS patients who underwent a staging transperineal template‐guided mapping biopsy (TTMB) prior to enrollment on AS were evaluated and stratified by age. Evaluated outcomes included OS, FDM, TI, and QOL to include urinary, bowel, sexual function, and depression. Post void residual (PVR) urine measurements were also followed. Repeat biopsy was based on PSA kinetics, abnormal digital rectal examination or patient preference. RESULTS: Of the 305 patients, 290 (95.1%) were Gleason 3 + 3 and 15 patients (4.9%) were Gleason 3 + 4. The median follow‐up was 5.5 years (range 1‐14 years). At 10 years, TI was 0%, 1.0%, and 11.4% for patients ≤59, 60‐69, and ≥70 years of age (P < .001). No patient has developed distant metastasis. The median time to TI was 4.71 years. No statistical differences in urinary function, bowel function, or depression were noted. Potency preservation was dependent on patient age. CONCLUSION: Within the confines of the follow‐up of our series, younger patients were less likely to proceed to therapeutic intervention. In addition, patient age did not adversely impact QOL outcomes. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8988763/ /pubmed/35474886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.52 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Merrick, Gregory S.
Rohmann, Gabe
Galbreath, Robert
Scholl, Whitney
Fiano, Ryan
Bennett, Abbey
Butler, Wayne M.
Adamovich, Edward
The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title_full The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title_fullStr The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title_full_unstemmed The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title_short The impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
title_sort impact of age on prostate cancer progression and quality of life in active surveillance patients
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988763/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.52
work_keys_str_mv AT merrickgregorys theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT rohmanngabe theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT galbreathrobert theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT schollwhitney theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT fianoryan theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT bennettabbey theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT butlerwaynem theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT adamovichedward theimpactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT merrickgregorys impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT rohmanngabe impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT galbreathrobert impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT schollwhitney impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT fianoryan impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT bennettabbey impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT butlerwaynem impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients
AT adamovichedward impactofageonprostatecancerprogressionandqualityoflifeinactivesurveillancepatients