Cargando…
A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59 |
_version_ | 1784683039618498560 |
---|---|
author | Pavlovich, C. P. Hyndman, M. E. Eure, G. Ghai, S. Caumartin, Y. Herget, E. Young, J. D. Wiseman, D. Caughlin, C. Gray, R. Wason, S. Mettee, L. Lodde, M. Toi, A. Dujardin, T. Lance, R. Schatz, S. M. Fabrizio, M. Malcolm, J. B. Fradet, V. |
author_facet | Pavlovich, C. P. Hyndman, M. E. Eure, G. Ghai, S. Caumartin, Y. Herget, E. Young, J. D. Wiseman, D. Caughlin, C. Gray, R. Wason, S. Mettee, L. Lodde, M. Toi, A. Dujardin, T. Lance, R. Schatz, S. M. Fabrizio, M. Malcolm, J. B. Fradet, V. |
author_sort | Pavlovich, C. P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed where 1676 men with indications for prostate biopsy and without known prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to micro‐US vs conventional end‐fire ultrasound (conv‐US) transrectal‐guided prostate biopsy across five sites in North America. The trial was split into two phases, before and after training on a micro‐US image interpretation protocol that was developed during the trial using data from the pre‐training micro‐US arm. Investigators received a standardized training program mid‐trial, and the post‐training micro‐US data were used to examine the training effect. RESULTS: Detection of csPCa (the primary outcome) was no better with the first‐generation micro‐US system than with conv‐US in the overall population (34.6% vs 36.6%, respectively, P = .21). Data from the first portion of the trial were, however, used to develop an image interpretation protocol termed PRI‐MUS in order to address the lack of understanding of the appearance of cancer under micro‐US. Micro‐US sensitivity in the post‐training group improved to 60.8% from 24.6% (P < .01), while specificity decreased (from 84.2% to 63.2%). Detection of csPCa in the micro‐US arm increased by 7% after training (32% to 39%, P < .03), but training instituted mid‐trial did not affect the overall results of the comparison between arms. CONCLUSION: Micro‐US provided no clear benefit over conv‐US for the detection of csPCa at biopsy. However, it became evident during the trial that training and increasing experience with this novel technology improved the performance of this first‐generation system. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988781 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89887812022-04-25 A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy Pavlovich, C. P. Hyndman, M. E. Eure, G. Ghai, S. Caumartin, Y. Herget, E. Young, J. D. Wiseman, D. Caughlin, C. Gray, R. Wason, S. Mettee, L. Lodde, M. Toi, A. Dujardin, T. Lance, R. Schatz, S. M. Fabrizio, M. Malcolm, J. B. Fradet, V. BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed where 1676 men with indications for prostate biopsy and without known prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to micro‐US vs conventional end‐fire ultrasound (conv‐US) transrectal‐guided prostate biopsy across five sites in North America. The trial was split into two phases, before and after training on a micro‐US image interpretation protocol that was developed during the trial using data from the pre‐training micro‐US arm. Investigators received a standardized training program mid‐trial, and the post‐training micro‐US data were used to examine the training effect. RESULTS: Detection of csPCa (the primary outcome) was no better with the first‐generation micro‐US system than with conv‐US in the overall population (34.6% vs 36.6%, respectively, P = .21). Data from the first portion of the trial were, however, used to develop an image interpretation protocol termed PRI‐MUS in order to address the lack of understanding of the appearance of cancer under micro‐US. Micro‐US sensitivity in the post‐training group improved to 60.8% from 24.6% (P < .01), while specificity decreased (from 84.2% to 63.2%). Detection of csPCa in the micro‐US arm increased by 7% after training (32% to 39%, P < .03), but training instituted mid‐trial did not affect the overall results of the comparison between arms. CONCLUSION: Micro‐US provided no clear benefit over conv‐US for the detection of csPCa at biopsy. However, it became evident during the trial that training and increasing experience with this novel technology improved the performance of this first‐generation system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8988781/ /pubmed/35474889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Pavlovich, C. P. Hyndman, M. E. Eure, G. Ghai, S. Caumartin, Y. Herget, E. Young, J. D. Wiseman, D. Caughlin, C. Gray, R. Wason, S. Mettee, L. Lodde, M. Toi, A. Dujardin, T. Lance, R. Schatz, S. M. Fabrizio, M. Malcolm, J. B. Fradet, V. A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title | A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title_full | A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title_fullStr | A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title_full_unstemmed | A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title_short | A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
title_sort | multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988781/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pavlovichcp amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT hyndmanme amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT eureg amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT ghais amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT caumartiny amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT hergete amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT youngjd amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT wisemand amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT caughlinc amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT grayr amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT wasons amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT metteel amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT loddem amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT toia amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT dujardint amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT lancer amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT schatzsm amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT fabriziom amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT malcolmjb amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT fradetv amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT pavlovichcp multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT hyndmanme multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT eureg multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT ghais multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT caumartiny multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT hergete multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT youngjd multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT wisemand multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT caughlinc multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT grayr multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT wasons multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT metteel multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT loddem multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT toia multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT dujardint multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT lancer multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT schatzsm multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT fabriziom multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT malcolmjb multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy AT fradetv multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy |