Cargando…

A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy

OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavlovich, C. P., Hyndman, M. E., Eure, G., Ghai, S., Caumartin, Y., Herget, E., Young, J. D., Wiseman, D., Caughlin, C., Gray, R., Wason, S., Mettee, L., Lodde, M., Toi, A., Dujardin, T., Lance, R., Schatz, S. M., Fabrizio, M., Malcolm, J. B., Fradet, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59
_version_ 1784683039618498560
author Pavlovich, C. P.
Hyndman, M. E.
Eure, G.
Ghai, S.
Caumartin, Y.
Herget, E.
Young, J. D.
Wiseman, D.
Caughlin, C.
Gray, R.
Wason, S.
Mettee, L.
Lodde, M.
Toi, A.
Dujardin, T.
Lance, R.
Schatz, S. M.
Fabrizio, M.
Malcolm, J. B.
Fradet, V.
author_facet Pavlovich, C. P.
Hyndman, M. E.
Eure, G.
Ghai, S.
Caumartin, Y.
Herget, E.
Young, J. D.
Wiseman, D.
Caughlin, C.
Gray, R.
Wason, S.
Mettee, L.
Lodde, M.
Toi, A.
Dujardin, T.
Lance, R.
Schatz, S. M.
Fabrizio, M.
Malcolm, J. B.
Fradet, V.
author_sort Pavlovich, C. P.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed where 1676 men with indications for prostate biopsy and without known prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to micro‐US vs conventional end‐fire ultrasound (conv‐US) transrectal‐guided prostate biopsy across five sites in North America. The trial was split into two phases, before and after training on a micro‐US image interpretation protocol that was developed during the trial using data from the pre‐training micro‐US arm. Investigators received a standardized training program mid‐trial, and the post‐training micro‐US data were used to examine the training effect. RESULTS: Detection of csPCa (the primary outcome) was no better with the first‐generation micro‐US system than with conv‐US in the overall population (34.6% vs 36.6%, respectively, P = .21). Data from the first portion of the trial were, however, used to develop an image interpretation protocol termed PRI‐MUS in order to address the lack of understanding of the appearance of cancer under micro‐US. Micro‐US sensitivity in the post‐training group improved to 60.8% from 24.6% (P < .01), while specificity decreased (from 84.2% to 63.2%). Detection of csPCa in the micro‐US arm increased by 7% after training (32% to 39%, P < .03), but training instituted mid‐trial did not affect the overall results of the comparison between arms. CONCLUSION: Micro‐US provided no clear benefit over conv‐US for the detection of csPCa at biopsy. However, it became evident during the trial that training and increasing experience with this novel technology improved the performance of this first‐generation system.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988781
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89887812022-04-25 A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy Pavlovich, C. P. Hyndman, M. E. Eure, G. Ghai, S. Caumartin, Y. Herget, E. Young, J. D. Wiseman, D. Caughlin, C. Gray, R. Wason, S. Mettee, L. Lodde, M. Toi, A. Dujardin, T. Lance, R. Schatz, S. M. Fabrizio, M. Malcolm, J. B. Fradet, V. BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To study high‐frequency 29 MHz transrectal side‐fire micro‐ultrasound (micro‐US) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on prostate biopsy, and validate an image interpretation protocol for micro‐US imaging of the prostate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized clinical trial was performed where 1676 men with indications for prostate biopsy and without known prostate cancer were randomized 1:1 to micro‐US vs conventional end‐fire ultrasound (conv‐US) transrectal‐guided prostate biopsy across five sites in North America. The trial was split into two phases, before and after training on a micro‐US image interpretation protocol that was developed during the trial using data from the pre‐training micro‐US arm. Investigators received a standardized training program mid‐trial, and the post‐training micro‐US data were used to examine the training effect. RESULTS: Detection of csPCa (the primary outcome) was no better with the first‐generation micro‐US system than with conv‐US in the overall population (34.6% vs 36.6%, respectively, P = .21). Data from the first portion of the trial were, however, used to develop an image interpretation protocol termed PRI‐MUS in order to address the lack of understanding of the appearance of cancer under micro‐US. Micro‐US sensitivity in the post‐training group improved to 60.8% from 24.6% (P < .01), while specificity decreased (from 84.2% to 63.2%). Detection of csPCa in the micro‐US arm increased by 7% after training (32% to 39%, P < .03), but training instituted mid‐trial did not affect the overall results of the comparison between arms. CONCLUSION: Micro‐US provided no clear benefit over conv‐US for the detection of csPCa at biopsy. However, it became evident during the trial that training and increasing experience with this novel technology improved the performance of this first‐generation system. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8988781/ /pubmed/35474889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59 Text en © 2020 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Pavlovich, C. P.
Hyndman, M. E.
Eure, G.
Ghai, S.
Caumartin, Y.
Herget, E.
Young, J. D.
Wiseman, D.
Caughlin, C.
Gray, R.
Wason, S.
Mettee, L.
Lodde, M.
Toi, A.
Dujardin, T.
Lance, R.
Schatz, S. M.
Fabrizio, M.
Malcolm, J. B.
Fradet, V.
A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title_full A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title_fullStr A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title_short A multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
title_sort multi‐institutional randomized controlled trial comparing first‐generation transrectal high‐resolution micro‐ultrasound with conventional frequency transrectal ultrasound for prostate biopsy
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988781/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.59
work_keys_str_mv AT pavlovichcp amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT hyndmanme amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT eureg amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT ghais amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT caumartiny amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT hergete amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT youngjd amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT wisemand amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT caughlinc amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT grayr amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT wasons amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT metteel amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT loddem amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT toia amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT dujardint amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT lancer amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT schatzsm amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT fabriziom amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT malcolmjb amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT fradetv amultiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT pavlovichcp multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT hyndmanme multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT eureg multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT ghais multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT caumartiny multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT hergete multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT youngjd multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT wisemand multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT caughlinc multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT grayr multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT wasons multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT metteel multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT loddem multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT toia multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT dujardint multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT lancer multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT schatzsm multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT fabriziom multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT malcolmjb multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy
AT fradetv multiinstitutionalrandomizedcontrolledtrialcomparingfirstgenerationtransrectalhighresolutionmicroultrasoundwithconventionalfrequencytransrectalultrasoundforprostatebiopsy