Cargando…
Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86 |
_version_ | 1784683040103989248 |
---|---|
author | Altok, Muammer Demirel, Cihan Kang, Hyunseon C. Choi, Haesun John, David Inguillo, Irene A. Davis, John W. Ward, John F. |
author_facet | Altok, Muammer Demirel, Cihan Kang, Hyunseon C. Choi, Haesun John, David Inguillo, Irene A. Davis, John W. Ward, John F. |
author_sort | Altok, Muammer |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiologists segmented at least 1 region of interest (ROI) for each of these men using screening 1.5T MRI images. A single urologist employed the robotic‐assisted Artemis MRI/ultrasonography (US) fusion platform to obtain 2‐3 targeted samples from each ROI and additional random samples from the zones of the prostate outside the ROIs (a total of 12 zonal samples). Biopsy outcomes were categorized based on the Gleason score (GS) grade group (GG) as no cancer, favorable (GG < 3 or GS < 4 + 3), or clinically significant (GG ≥ 3 or GS ≥ 4 + 3) cancer. RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rate was 75%:31% clinically significant, 44% favorable, and 25% no cancer. These findings triggered active interventions in 176 (58%) patients. A prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 0–4 ng/mL was detected in 39 (66%) of 59 patients (32 favorable, 7 significant), 4–10 ng/mL in 147 (77%) of 190 patients (85 favorable, 62 significant), and 10 ng/mL and over in 44 (80%) of 55 patients (17 favorable, 27 significant). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor detection rate was 75% with IGTpBx in patients without a previous biopsy. In addition, about 42% of detected cancers were deemed clinically significant and led to active interventions. IGTpBx as a patient’s first prostate biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with historical data for random systematic prostate biopsy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89887832022-04-25 Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience Altok, Muammer Demirel, Cihan Kang, Hyunseon C. Choi, Haesun John, David Inguillo, Irene A. Davis, John W. Ward, John F. BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiologists segmented at least 1 region of interest (ROI) for each of these men using screening 1.5T MRI images. A single urologist employed the robotic‐assisted Artemis MRI/ultrasonography (US) fusion platform to obtain 2‐3 targeted samples from each ROI and additional random samples from the zones of the prostate outside the ROIs (a total of 12 zonal samples). Biopsy outcomes were categorized based on the Gleason score (GS) grade group (GG) as no cancer, favorable (GG < 3 or GS < 4 + 3), or clinically significant (GG ≥ 3 or GS ≥ 4 + 3) cancer. RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rate was 75%:31% clinically significant, 44% favorable, and 25% no cancer. These findings triggered active interventions in 176 (58%) patients. A prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 0–4 ng/mL was detected in 39 (66%) of 59 patients (32 favorable, 7 significant), 4–10 ng/mL in 147 (77%) of 190 patients (85 favorable, 62 significant), and 10 ng/mL and over in 44 (80%) of 55 patients (17 favorable, 27 significant). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor detection rate was 75% with IGTpBx in patients without a previous biopsy. In addition, about 42% of detected cancers were deemed clinically significant and led to active interventions. IGTpBx as a patient’s first prostate biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with historical data for random systematic prostate biopsy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8988783/ /pubmed/35475153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Altok, Muammer Demirel, Cihan Kang, Hyunseon C. Choi, Haesun John, David Inguillo, Irene A. Davis, John W. Ward, John F. Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title | Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title_full | Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title_fullStr | Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title_short | Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience |
title_sort | impact of mri/us fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: a single urologist’s experience |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altokmuammer impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT demirelcihan impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT kanghyunseonc impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT choihaesun impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT johndavid impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT inguilloirenea impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT davisjohnw impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience AT wardjohnf impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience |