Cargando…

Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience

OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altok, Muammer, Demirel, Cihan, Kang, Hyunseon C., Choi, Haesun, John, David, Inguillo, Irene A., Davis, John W., Ward, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86
_version_ 1784683040103989248
author Altok, Muammer
Demirel, Cihan
Kang, Hyunseon C.
Choi, Haesun
John, David
Inguillo, Irene A.
Davis, John W.
Ward, John F.
author_facet Altok, Muammer
Demirel, Cihan
Kang, Hyunseon C.
Choi, Haesun
John, David
Inguillo, Irene A.
Davis, John W.
Ward, John F.
author_sort Altok, Muammer
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiologists segmented at least 1 region of interest (ROI) for each of these men using screening 1.5T MRI images. A single urologist employed the robotic‐assisted Artemis MRI/ultrasonography (US) fusion platform to obtain 2‐3 targeted samples from each ROI and additional random samples from the zones of the prostate outside the ROIs (a total of 12 zonal samples). Biopsy outcomes were categorized based on the Gleason score (GS) grade group (GG) as no cancer, favorable (GG < 3 or GS < 4 + 3), or clinically significant (GG ≥ 3 or GS ≥ 4 + 3) cancer. RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rate was 75%:31% clinically significant, 44% favorable, and 25% no cancer. These findings triggered active interventions in 176 (58%) patients. A prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 0–4 ng/mL was detected in 39 (66%) of 59 patients (32 favorable, 7 significant), 4–10 ng/mL in 147 (77%) of 190 patients (85 favorable, 62 significant), and 10 ng/mL and over in 44 (80%) of 55 patients (17 favorable, 27 significant). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor detection rate was 75% with IGTpBx in patients without a previous biopsy. In addition, about 42% of detected cancers were deemed clinically significant and led to active interventions. IGTpBx as a patient’s first prostate biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with historical data for random systematic prostate biopsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89887832022-04-25 Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience Altok, Muammer Demirel, Cihan Kang, Hyunseon C. Choi, Haesun John, David Inguillo, Irene A. Davis, John W. Ward, John F. BJUI Compass Original Articles OBJECTIVES: To report our experience with imaging‐guided targeted prostate biopsy (IGTpBx) for patients undergoing initial prostate biopsy in a clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 2014 to February 2020, 305 men who had IGTpBx performed as their first prostate biopsy were enrolled. Two dedicated magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiologists segmented at least 1 region of interest (ROI) for each of these men using screening 1.5T MRI images. A single urologist employed the robotic‐assisted Artemis MRI/ultrasonography (US) fusion platform to obtain 2‐3 targeted samples from each ROI and additional random samples from the zones of the prostate outside the ROIs (a total of 12 zonal samples). Biopsy outcomes were categorized based on the Gleason score (GS) grade group (GG) as no cancer, favorable (GG < 3 or GS < 4 + 3), or clinically significant (GG ≥ 3 or GS ≥ 4 + 3) cancer. RESULTS: The overall cancer detection rate was 75%:31% clinically significant, 44% favorable, and 25% no cancer. These findings triggered active interventions in 176 (58%) patients. A prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) level of 0–4 ng/mL was detected in 39 (66%) of 59 patients (32 favorable, 7 significant), 4–10 ng/mL in 147 (77%) of 190 patients (85 favorable, 62 significant), and 10 ng/mL and over in 44 (80%) of 55 patients (17 favorable, 27 significant). CONCLUSIONS: The tumor detection rate was 75% with IGTpBx in patients without a previous biopsy. In addition, about 42% of detected cancers were deemed clinically significant and led to active interventions. IGTpBx as a patient’s first prostate biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer when compared with historical data for random systematic prostate biopsy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC8988783/ /pubmed/35475153 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Altok, Muammer
Demirel, Cihan
Kang, Hyunseon C.
Choi, Haesun
John, David
Inguillo, Irene A.
Davis, John W.
Ward, John F.
Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title_full Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title_fullStr Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title_full_unstemmed Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title_short Impact of MRI/US fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: A single urologist’s experience
title_sort impact of mri/us fusion‐guided prostate biopsy on biopsy‐naïve patients: a single urologist’s experience
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35475153
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.86
work_keys_str_mv AT altokmuammer impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT demirelcihan impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT kanghyunseonc impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT choihaesun impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT johndavid impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT inguilloirenea impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT davisjohnw impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience
AT wardjohnf impactofmriusfusionguidedprostatebiopsyonbiopsynaivepatientsasingleurologistsexperience