Cargando…

The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ozaki, Kai, Hatakeyama, Shingo, Tanaka, Toshikazu, Noro, Daisuke, Tokui, Noriko, Horiguchi, Hirotaka, Okuyama, Yoshiharu, Fujita, Naoki, Okamoto, Teppei, Okamoto, Akiko, Suzuki, Yuichiro, Yamamoto, Hayato, Yoneyama, Takahiro, Hashimoto, Yasuhiro, Ohyama, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119
_version_ 1784683042992816128
author Ozaki, Kai
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Noro, Daisuke
Tokui, Noriko
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Okuyama, Yoshiharu
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Okamoto, Akiko
Suzuki, Yuichiro
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_facet Ozaki, Kai
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Noro, Daisuke
Tokui, Noriko
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Okuyama, Yoshiharu
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Okamoto, Akiko
Suzuki, Yuichiro
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_sort Ozaki, Kai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 213 patients (median age, 71 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum‐based first‐line chemotherapy between May 2003 and April 2021. The patients were categorized into the following two groups: progressive disease (PD) within four cycles (trial ineligible group) and non‐PD within four cycles (trial eligible group). The primary outcomes were the estimated proportion of trial eligible patients for maintenance immunotherapy. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of the overall survival in the trial eligible and ineligible groups and the impact of radiologic response at the second cycle on the fourth cycle. RESULTS: Among the 213 patients, 81 (38%) were included in the trial eligible group. The trial eligible group had a significantly longer overall survival than the trial ineligible group (P < 0.001). Of 166 patients who had no PD within two cycles, 85 (51%) patients experienced PD within four cycles. Patients with a complete response or partial response at the second cycle had a significantly lower rate of PD at the fourth cycle (42%) than those with stable disease at the second cycle (59%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: We observed 38% of the trial eligible population. Overall survival was significantly different between the trial eligible and ineligible groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89888052022-04-25 The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma Ozaki, Kai Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Noro, Daisuke Tokui, Noriko Horiguchi, Hirotaka Okuyama, Yoshiharu Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Okamoto, Akiko Suzuki, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 213 patients (median age, 71 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum‐based first‐line chemotherapy between May 2003 and April 2021. The patients were categorized into the following two groups: progressive disease (PD) within four cycles (trial ineligible group) and non‐PD within four cycles (trial eligible group). The primary outcomes were the estimated proportion of trial eligible patients for maintenance immunotherapy. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of the overall survival in the trial eligible and ineligible groups and the impact of radiologic response at the second cycle on the fourth cycle. RESULTS: Among the 213 patients, 81 (38%) were included in the trial eligible group. The trial eligible group had a significantly longer overall survival than the trial ineligible group (P < 0.001). Of 166 patients who had no PD within two cycles, 85 (51%) patients experienced PD within four cycles. Patients with a complete response or partial response at the second cycle had a significantly lower rate of PD at the fourth cycle (42%) than those with stable disease at the second cycle (59%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: We observed 38% of the trial eligible population. Overall survival was significantly different between the trial eligible and ineligible groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8988805/ /pubmed/35474727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Ozaki, Kai
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Tanaka, Toshikazu
Noro, Daisuke
Tokui, Noriko
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Okuyama, Yoshiharu
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Okamoto, Akiko
Suzuki, Yuichiro
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title_full The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title_fullStr The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title_short The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
title_sort impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474727
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119
work_keys_str_mv AT ozakikai theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT hatakeyamashingo theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT tanakatoshikazu theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT norodaisuke theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT tokuinoriko theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT horiguchihirotaka theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okuyamayoshiharu theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT fujitanaoki theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okamototeppei theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okamotoakiko theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT suzukiyuichiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT yamamotohayato theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT yoneyamatakahiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT hashimotoyasuhiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT ohyamachikara theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT ozakikai impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT hatakeyamashingo impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT tanakatoshikazu impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT norodaisuke impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT tokuinoriko impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT horiguchihirotaka impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okuyamayoshiharu impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT fujitanaoki impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okamototeppei impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT okamotoakiko impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT suzukiyuichiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT yamamotohayato impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT yoneyamatakahiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT hashimotoyasuhiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma
AT ohyamachikara impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma