Cargando…
The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectiv...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119 |
_version_ | 1784683042992816128 |
---|---|
author | Ozaki, Kai Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Noro, Daisuke Tokui, Noriko Horiguchi, Hirotaka Okuyama, Yoshiharu Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Okamoto, Akiko Suzuki, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_facet | Ozaki, Kai Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Noro, Daisuke Tokui, Noriko Horiguchi, Hirotaka Okuyama, Yoshiharu Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Okamoto, Akiko Suzuki, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_sort | Ozaki, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 213 patients (median age, 71 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum‐based first‐line chemotherapy between May 2003 and April 2021. The patients were categorized into the following two groups: progressive disease (PD) within four cycles (trial ineligible group) and non‐PD within four cycles (trial eligible group). The primary outcomes were the estimated proportion of trial eligible patients for maintenance immunotherapy. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of the overall survival in the trial eligible and ineligible groups and the impact of radiologic response at the second cycle on the fourth cycle. RESULTS: Among the 213 patients, 81 (38%) were included in the trial eligible group. The trial eligible group had a significantly longer overall survival than the trial ineligible group (P < 0.001). Of 166 patients who had no PD within two cycles, 85 (51%) patients experienced PD within four cycles. Patients with a complete response or partial response at the second cycle had a significantly lower rate of PD at the fourth cycle (42%) than those with stable disease at the second cycle (59%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: We observed 38% of the trial eligible population. Overall survival was significantly different between the trial eligible and ineligible groups. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988805 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89888052022-04-25 The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma Ozaki, Kai Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Noro, Daisuke Tokui, Noriko Horiguchi, Hirotaka Okuyama, Yoshiharu Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Okamoto, Akiko Suzuki, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To investigate the eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy and its impact on the prognosis of advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with first‐line chemotherapy, as the selection biases of the eligible population in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 213 patients (median age, 71 years) with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with platinum‐based first‐line chemotherapy between May 2003 and April 2021. The patients were categorized into the following two groups: progressive disease (PD) within four cycles (trial ineligible group) and non‐PD within four cycles (trial eligible group). The primary outcomes were the estimated proportion of trial eligible patients for maintenance immunotherapy. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of the overall survival in the trial eligible and ineligible groups and the impact of radiologic response at the second cycle on the fourth cycle. RESULTS: Among the 213 patients, 81 (38%) were included in the trial eligible group. The trial eligible group had a significantly longer overall survival than the trial ineligible group (P < 0.001). Of 166 patients who had no PD within two cycles, 85 (51%) patients experienced PD within four cycles. Patients with a complete response or partial response at the second cycle had a significantly lower rate of PD at the fourth cycle (42%) than those with stable disease at the second cycle (59%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSION: We observed 38% of the trial eligible population. Overall survival was significantly different between the trial eligible and ineligible groups. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8988805/ /pubmed/35474727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Ozaki, Kai Hatakeyama, Shingo Tanaka, Toshikazu Noro, Daisuke Tokui, Noriko Horiguchi, Hirotaka Okuyama, Yoshiharu Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Okamoto, Akiko Suzuki, Yuichiro Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title | The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title_full | The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title_fullStr | The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title_short | The impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
title_sort | impact of eligibility for maintenance immunotherapy on prognosis in patients with unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988805/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474727 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ozakikai theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT hatakeyamashingo theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT tanakatoshikazu theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT norodaisuke theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT tokuinoriko theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT horiguchihirotaka theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okuyamayoshiharu theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT fujitanaoki theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okamototeppei theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okamotoakiko theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT suzukiyuichiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT yamamotohayato theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT yoneyamatakahiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT hashimotoyasuhiro theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT ohyamachikara theimpactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT ozakikai impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT hatakeyamashingo impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT tanakatoshikazu impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT norodaisuke impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT tokuinoriko impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT horiguchihirotaka impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okuyamayoshiharu impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT fujitanaoki impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okamototeppei impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT okamotoakiko impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT suzukiyuichiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT yamamotohayato impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT yoneyamatakahiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT hashimotoyasuhiro impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma AT ohyamachikara impactofeligibilityformaintenanceimmunotherapyonprognosisinpatientswithunresectableormetastaticurothelialcarcinoma |