Cargando…
Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prosp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106 |
_version_ | 1784683043979526144 |
---|---|
author | Hogan, Donnacha Kanagarajah, Abbie Yao, Henry H. Wetherell, David Dias, Brendan Dundee, Phil Chu, Kevin Zargar, Homayoun O'Connell, Helen E. |
author_facet | Hogan, Donnacha Kanagarajah, Abbie Yao, Henry H. Wetherell, David Dias, Brendan Dundee, Phil Chu, Kevin Zargar, Homayoun O'Connell, Helen E. |
author_sort | Hogan, Donnacha |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prospective pilot cohort study of patients undergoing transperineal biopsy was performed. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent flexible cystoscopy or language barriers. Patients had a choice of GA or LA. A prospective questionnaire on Days 0, 1, 7, and 30 was applied. The primary outcome was patient tolerability. Secondary outcomes were cancer detection rate, complication rate, and theater utilization. RESULTS: This study included 80 patients (40 GA TPTB and 40 LA PPTAS). Baseline characteristics including age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), findings, and prostate volume were comparable between the groups (p = 0.3790, p = 0.9832, p = 0.444, p = 0.3939, respectively). Higher median prostate imaging‐reporting and data system (PI‐RADS) score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) versus 3 (IQR 1) was noted in the LA group (p = 0.0326). Pain was higher leaving recovery in the GA group however not significantly (p = 0.0555). Median pain score at LA infiltration was 5/10 (IQR 3), with no difference in pain at Days 1, 7, or 30 (p = 0.2722, 0.6465, and 0.8184, respectively). For GA versus LA, the overall cancer detection rate was 55% versus 55% (p = 1.000) with clinically significant cancer in 22.5% versus 35% (p = 0.217). Acute urinary retention (AUR) occurred in 5% of GA and 2.5% of LA patients (p = 1.000). The GA cohort spent longer in theater and in recovery with a median of 93.5 min versus 57 min for the LA group (p = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that transperineal biopsy is safely performed under LA with no difference between the cohorts in relation cancer detection or AUR. LA biopsy also consumed less theater and recovery resources. A further larger prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings of this study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8988812 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89888122022-04-25 Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications Hogan, Donnacha Kanagarajah, Abbie Yao, Henry H. Wetherell, David Dias, Brendan Dundee, Phil Chu, Kevin Zargar, Homayoun O'Connell, Helen E. BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prospective pilot cohort study of patients undergoing transperineal biopsy was performed. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent flexible cystoscopy or language barriers. Patients had a choice of GA or LA. A prospective questionnaire on Days 0, 1, 7, and 30 was applied. The primary outcome was patient tolerability. Secondary outcomes were cancer detection rate, complication rate, and theater utilization. RESULTS: This study included 80 patients (40 GA TPTB and 40 LA PPTAS). Baseline characteristics including age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), findings, and prostate volume were comparable between the groups (p = 0.3790, p = 0.9832, p = 0.444, p = 0.3939, respectively). Higher median prostate imaging‐reporting and data system (PI‐RADS) score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) versus 3 (IQR 1) was noted in the LA group (p = 0.0326). Pain was higher leaving recovery in the GA group however not significantly (p = 0.0555). Median pain score at LA infiltration was 5/10 (IQR 3), with no difference in pain at Days 1, 7, or 30 (p = 0.2722, 0.6465, and 0.8184, respectively). For GA versus LA, the overall cancer detection rate was 55% versus 55% (p = 1.000) with clinically significant cancer in 22.5% versus 35% (p = 0.217). Acute urinary retention (AUR) occurred in 5% of GA and 2.5% of LA patients (p = 1.000). The GA cohort spent longer in theater and in recovery with a median of 93.5 min versus 57 min for the LA group (p = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that transperineal biopsy is safely performed under LA with no difference between the cohorts in relation cancer detection or AUR. LA biopsy also consumed less theater and recovery resources. A further larger prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings of this study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8988812/ /pubmed/35474705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | ORIGINAL ARTICLES Hogan, Donnacha Kanagarajah, Abbie Yao, Henry H. Wetherell, David Dias, Brendan Dundee, Phil Chu, Kevin Zargar, Homayoun O'Connell, Helen E. Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title | Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title_full | Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title_fullStr | Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title_full_unstemmed | Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title_short | Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
title_sort | local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: tolerability, cancer detection, and complications |
topic | ORIGINAL ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988812/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hogandonnacha localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT kanagarajahabbie localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT yaohenryh localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT wetherelldavid localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT diasbrendan localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT dundeephil localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT chukevin localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT zargarhomayoun localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications AT oconnellhelene localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications |