Cargando…

Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications

OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prosp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hogan, Donnacha, Kanagarajah, Abbie, Yao, Henry H., Wetherell, David, Dias, Brendan, Dundee, Phil, Chu, Kevin, Zargar, Homayoun, O'Connell, Helen E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106
_version_ 1784683043979526144
author Hogan, Donnacha
Kanagarajah, Abbie
Yao, Henry H.
Wetherell, David
Dias, Brendan
Dundee, Phil
Chu, Kevin
Zargar, Homayoun
O'Connell, Helen E.
author_facet Hogan, Donnacha
Kanagarajah, Abbie
Yao, Henry H.
Wetherell, David
Dias, Brendan
Dundee, Phil
Chu, Kevin
Zargar, Homayoun
O'Connell, Helen E.
author_sort Hogan, Donnacha
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prospective pilot cohort study of patients undergoing transperineal biopsy was performed. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent flexible cystoscopy or language barriers. Patients had a choice of GA or LA. A prospective questionnaire on Days 0, 1, 7, and 30 was applied. The primary outcome was patient tolerability. Secondary outcomes were cancer detection rate, complication rate, and theater utilization. RESULTS: This study included 80 patients (40 GA TPTB and 40 LA PPTAS). Baseline characteristics including age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), findings, and prostate volume were comparable between the groups (p = 0.3790, p = 0.9832, p = 0.444, p = 0.3939, respectively). Higher median prostate imaging‐reporting and data system (PI‐RADS) score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) versus 3 (IQR 1) was noted in the LA group (p = 0.0326). Pain was higher leaving recovery in the GA group however not significantly (p = 0.0555). Median pain score at LA infiltration was 5/10 (IQR 3), with no difference in pain at Days 1, 7, or 30 (p = 0.2722, 0.6465, and 0.8184, respectively). For GA versus LA, the overall cancer detection rate was 55% versus 55% (p = 1.000) with clinically significant cancer in 22.5% versus 35% (p = 0.217). Acute urinary retention (AUR) occurred in 5% of GA and 2.5% of LA patients (p = 1.000). The GA cohort spent longer in theater and in recovery with a median of 93.5 min versus 57 min for the LA group (p = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that transperineal biopsy is safely performed under LA with no difference between the cohorts in relation cancer detection or AUR. LA biopsy also consumed less theater and recovery resources. A further larger prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings of this study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8988812
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89888122022-04-25 Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications Hogan, Donnacha Kanagarajah, Abbie Yao, Henry H. Wetherell, David Dias, Brendan Dundee, Phil Chu, Kevin Zargar, Homayoun O'Connell, Helen E. BJUI Compass ORIGINAL ARTICLES OBJECTIVES: To compare data on transperineal template biopsy (TPTB) under general anesthesia (GA) compared with local anesthesia (LA) procedures using the PrecisionPoint™ Transperineal Access System (PPTAS) in relation to tolerability, cancer detection rate, complications, and cost. METHODS: A prospective pilot cohort study of patients undergoing transperineal biopsy was performed. Patients were excluded if they had concurrent flexible cystoscopy or language barriers. Patients had a choice of GA or LA. A prospective questionnaire on Days 0, 1, 7, and 30 was applied. The primary outcome was patient tolerability. Secondary outcomes were cancer detection rate, complication rate, and theater utilization. RESULTS: This study included 80 patients (40 GA TPTB and 40 LA PPTAS). Baseline characteristics including age, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA), digital rectal examination (DRE), findings, and prostate volume were comparable between the groups (p = 0.3790, p = 0.9832, p = 0.444, p = 0.3939, respectively). Higher median prostate imaging‐reporting and data system (PI‐RADS) score of 4 (interquartile range [IQR] 2) versus 3 (IQR 1) was noted in the LA group (p = 0.0326). Pain was higher leaving recovery in the GA group however not significantly (p = 0.0555). Median pain score at LA infiltration was 5/10 (IQR 3), with no difference in pain at Days 1, 7, or 30 (p = 0.2722, 0.6465, and 0.8184, respectively). For GA versus LA, the overall cancer detection rate was 55% versus 55% (p = 1.000) with clinically significant cancer in 22.5% versus 35% (p = 0.217). Acute urinary retention (AUR) occurred in 5% of GA and 2.5% of LA patients (p = 1.000). The GA cohort spent longer in theater and in recovery with a median of 93.5 min versus 57 min for the LA group (p = <0.0001). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that transperineal biopsy is safely performed under LA with no difference between the cohorts in relation cancer detection or AUR. LA biopsy also consumed less theater and recovery resources. A further larger prospective randomized controlled trial is required to confirm the findings of this study. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8988812/ /pubmed/35474705 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106 Text en © 2021 The Authors. BJUI Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International Company. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle ORIGINAL ARTICLES
Hogan, Donnacha
Kanagarajah, Abbie
Yao, Henry H.
Wetherell, David
Dias, Brendan
Dundee, Phil
Chu, Kevin
Zargar, Homayoun
O'Connell, Helen E.
Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title_full Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title_fullStr Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title_full_unstemmed Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title_short Local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: Tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
title_sort local versus general anesthesia transperineal prostate biopsy: tolerability, cancer detection, and complications
topic ORIGINAL ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8988812/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35474705
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bco2.106
work_keys_str_mv AT hogandonnacha localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT kanagarajahabbie localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT yaohenryh localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT wetherelldavid localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT diasbrendan localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT dundeephil localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT chukevin localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT zargarhomayoun localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications
AT oconnellhelene localversusgeneralanesthesiatransperinealprostatebiopsytolerabilitycancerdetectionandcomplications