Cargando…

Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study

BACKGROUND: The antibacterial activity of restorative material and the amount of fluoride released are interlinked. Hence, these are the two foremost properties to be studied. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the amount and pattern of fluoride release from Type IX GIC (GC HS posterior),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aparajitha, R. V., Selvan, P. Senthamil, Ahamed, A. Shafie, Bhavani, S., Nagarajan, V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399765
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21
_version_ 1784683111018135552
author Aparajitha, R. V.
Selvan, P. Senthamil
Ahamed, A. Shafie
Bhavani, S.
Nagarajan, V.
author_facet Aparajitha, R. V.
Selvan, P. Senthamil
Ahamed, A. Shafie
Bhavani, S.
Nagarajan, V.
author_sort Aparajitha, R. V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The antibacterial activity of restorative material and the amount of fluoride released are interlinked. Hence, these are the two foremost properties to be studied. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the amount and pattern of fluoride release from Type IX GIC (GC HS posterior), nanoionomer (Ketac N100), and alkasite (Cention N), and the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans at 24 and 48 h. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This in vitro study was carried out in laboratory settings with six samples of each group for fluoride release using an ion-chromatography (IC) machine and five samples of each group for antibacterial activity using agar plates. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Samples of each group, Group I – Type IX GIC, Group II – nanoionomer, and Group III –alkasite, were prepared, immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva, and fluoride release recorded using IC after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days intervals. The antibacterial activity against S. mutans was evaluated by placing samples of each group in the agar plates and measuring the diameter of zones of inhibition after 24 and 48 h. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way ANOVA test to check to mean differences between the groups and Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc test for multiple intergroup comparisons (P = 0.05). RESULTS: The Type IX GIC showed the highest fluoride release after day1. However, nanoionomer showed the maximum fluoride release for the remaining days. The least amount of fluoride released was from the alkasite throughout the study. The antibacterial activity of nanoionomer was the highest, followed by Type IX GIC and alkasite at both 24 and 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Nanoionomer showed the highest fluoride release and antibacterial activity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989179
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89891792022-04-08 Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study Aparajitha, R. V. Selvan, P. Senthamil Ahamed, A. Shafie Bhavani, S. Nagarajan, V. J Conserv Dent Original Article BACKGROUND: The antibacterial activity of restorative material and the amount of fluoride released are interlinked. Hence, these are the two foremost properties to be studied. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate and compare the amount and pattern of fluoride release from Type IX GIC (GC HS posterior), nanoionomer (Ketac N100), and alkasite (Cention N), and the antibacterial activity against Streptococcus mutans at 24 and 48 h. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This in vitro study was carried out in laboratory settings with six samples of each group for fluoride release using an ion-chromatography (IC) machine and five samples of each group for antibacterial activity using agar plates. MATERIALS AND METHODOLOGY: Samples of each group, Group I – Type IX GIC, Group II – nanoionomer, and Group III –alkasite, were prepared, immersed in 2 ml of artificial saliva, and fluoride release recorded using IC after 1, 7, 14, and 28 days intervals. The antibacterial activity against S. mutans was evaluated by placing samples of each group in the agar plates and measuring the diameter of zones of inhibition after 24 and 48 h. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way ANOVA test to check to mean differences between the groups and Tukey's honestly significant difference post hoc test for multiple intergroup comparisons (P = 0.05). RESULTS: The Type IX GIC showed the highest fluoride release after day1. However, nanoionomer showed the maximum fluoride release for the remaining days. The least amount of fluoride released was from the alkasite throughout the study. The antibacterial activity of nanoionomer was the highest, followed by Type IX GIC and alkasite at both 24 and 48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Nanoionomer showed the highest fluoride release and antibacterial activity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2022-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8989179/ /pubmed/35399765 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Conservative Dentistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aparajitha, R. V.
Selvan, P. Senthamil
Ahamed, A. Shafie
Bhavani, S.
Nagarajan, V.
Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title_full Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title_short Comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – An in vitro study
title_sort comparative evaluation of long-term fluoride release and antibacterial activity of an alkasite, nanoionomer, and glass ionomer restorative material – an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989179/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35399765
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jcd.jcd_336_21
work_keys_str_mv AT aparajitharv comparativeevaluationoflongtermfluoridereleaseandantibacterialactivityofanalkasitenanoionomerandglassionomerrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy
AT selvanpsenthamil comparativeevaluationoflongtermfluoridereleaseandantibacterialactivityofanalkasitenanoionomerandglassionomerrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy
AT ahamedashafie comparativeevaluationoflongtermfluoridereleaseandantibacterialactivityofanalkasitenanoionomerandglassionomerrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy
AT bhavanis comparativeevaluationoflongtermfluoridereleaseandantibacterialactivityofanalkasitenanoionomerandglassionomerrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy
AT nagarajanv comparativeevaluationoflongtermfluoridereleaseandantibacterialactivityofanalkasitenanoionomerandglassionomerrestorativematerialaninvitrostudy