Cargando…

Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study

BACKGROUND: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2(nd) choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sijbom, Martijn, Braun, Karolina K., Büchner, Frederike L., van Bodegom-Vos, Leti, Hendriks, Bart J. C., de Boer, Mark G. J., Numans, Mattijs E., Lambregts, Merel M. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266473
_version_ 1784683113769598976
author Sijbom, Martijn
Braun, Karolina K.
Büchner, Frederike L.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hendriks, Bart J. C.
de Boer, Mark G. J.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Lambregts, Merel M. C.
author_facet Sijbom, Martijn
Braun, Karolina K.
Büchner, Frederike L.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hendriks, Bart J. C.
de Boer, Mark G. J.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Lambregts, Merel M. C.
author_sort Sijbom, Martijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2(nd) choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of efficacy, increased toxicity and antibiotic resistance. To improve registration, a better understanding is needed of how incorrect labels are attributed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of antibiotic allergy registration in primary care and identify determinants to improve registration of antibiotic allergies. DESIGN: Registration of antibiotic allergies in primary care practices were analysed for 1) completeness and 2) correctness. To identify determinants for improvement, semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers from four healthcare domains were conducted. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 300 antibiotic allergy registrations were analysed for completeness and correctness. Thirty-four healthcare providers were interviewed. MAIN MEASURES: A registration was defined as complete when it included a description of all symptoms, time to onset of symptoms and the duration of symptoms. It was defined as correct when the conclusion was concordant with the Salden criteria. Determinants of correct antibiotic allergy registrations were divided into facilitators or obstructers. KEY RESULTS: Rates of completeness and correctness of registrations were 0% and 29.3%, respectively. The main perceived barriers for correct antibiotic allergy registration were insufficient knowledge, lack of priority, limitations of registration features in electronic medical records (EMR), fear of medical liability and patients interpreting side-effects as allergies. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of antibiotic allergy registrations can be improved. Potential interventions include raising awareness of the consequences of incomplete and the importance of correct registrations, by continued education, and above all simplifying registration in an EMR by adequate ICT support.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89891912022-04-08 Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study Sijbom, Martijn Braun, Karolina K. Büchner, Frederike L. van Bodegom-Vos, Leti Hendriks, Bart J. C. de Boer, Mark G. J. Numans, Mattijs E. Lambregts, Merel M. C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Approximately 2% of patients in primary care practice and up to 25% of hospital patients are registered as being allergic to an antibiotic. However, up to 90% of these registrations are incorrect, leading to unnecessary prescription of 2(nd) choice antibiotics with the attendant loss of efficacy, increased toxicity and antibiotic resistance. To improve registration, a better understanding is needed of how incorrect labels are attributed. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the quality of antibiotic allergy registration in primary care and identify determinants to improve registration of antibiotic allergies. DESIGN: Registration of antibiotic allergies in primary care practices were analysed for 1) completeness and 2) correctness. To identify determinants for improvement, semi-structured interviews with healthcare providers from four healthcare domains were conducted. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 300 antibiotic allergy registrations were analysed for completeness and correctness. Thirty-four healthcare providers were interviewed. MAIN MEASURES: A registration was defined as complete when it included a description of all symptoms, time to onset of symptoms and the duration of symptoms. It was defined as correct when the conclusion was concordant with the Salden criteria. Determinants of correct antibiotic allergy registrations were divided into facilitators or obstructers. KEY RESULTS: Rates of completeness and correctness of registrations were 0% and 29.3%, respectively. The main perceived barriers for correct antibiotic allergy registration were insufficient knowledge, lack of priority, limitations of registration features in electronic medical records (EMR), fear of medical liability and patients interpreting side-effects as allergies. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of antibiotic allergy registrations can be improved. Potential interventions include raising awareness of the consequences of incomplete and the importance of correct registrations, by continued education, and above all simplifying registration in an EMR by adequate ICT support. Public Library of Science 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8989191/ /pubmed/35390063 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266473 Text en © 2022 Sijbom et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sijbom, Martijn
Braun, Karolina K.
Büchner, Frederike L.
van Bodegom-Vos, Leti
Hendriks, Bart J. C.
de Boer, Mark G. J.
Numans, Mattijs E.
Lambregts, Merel M. C.
Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title_full Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title_fullStr Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title_short Cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: A mixed-method study
title_sort cues to improve antibiotic-allergy registration: a mixed-method study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989191/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35390063
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0266473
work_keys_str_mv AT sijbommartijn cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT braunkarolinak cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT buchnerfrederikel cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT vanbodegomvosleti cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT hendriksbartjc cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT deboermarkgj cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT numansmattijse cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy
AT lambregtsmerelmc cuestoimproveantibioticallergyregistrationamixedmethodstudy