Cargando…

Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes

BACKGROUND: The most common secondary cancer is contralateral breast (CLB) cancer after whole breast irradiation (WBI). The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction of CLB dose in tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) for WBI using flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. MATERIALS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ogino, Ichiro, Seto, Hidetaka, Shigenaga, Daisuke, Hata, Masaharu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Via Medica 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402036
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0006
_version_ 1784683177446473728
author Ogino, Ichiro
Seto, Hidetaka
Shigenaga, Daisuke
Hata, Masaharu
author_facet Ogino, Ichiro
Seto, Hidetaka
Shigenaga, Daisuke
Hata, Masaharu
author_sort Ogino, Ichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The most common secondary cancer is contralateral breast (CLB) cancer after whole breast irradiation (WBI). The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction of CLB dose in tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) for WBI using flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We generated automated planning of 20 young breast cancer patients with limited user interaction. Dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung, heart, and CLB were calculated. The dose of PTV, the most medial CLB point, and the CLB point below the nipple was measured using an ionization chamber inserted in a slab phantom. We compared the two t-IMRT plans generated by FFF beams and flattening-filter (FF) beams. RESULTS: All plans were clinically acceptable. There was no difference in the conformal index, the homogeneity for FFF was significantly worse. For the ipsilateral lung, the maximum dose (D(max)) was significantly higher; however, V(20) showed a tendency to be lower in the FFF plan. No differences were found in the D(max) and V(30) to the heart of the left breast cancer. FF planning showed significantly lower D(max) and mean dose to the CLB. In contrast to the calculation results, the measured dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple were significantly lower in FFF mode than in FF mode, with mean reductions of 21.1% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: T-IMRT planning using FFF reduced the measured out-of-field dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Via Medica
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89894562022-04-08 Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes Ogino, Ichiro Seto, Hidetaka Shigenaga, Daisuke Hata, Masaharu Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Research Paper BACKGROUND: The most common secondary cancer is contralateral breast (CLB) cancer after whole breast irradiation (WBI). The aim of this study was to quantify the reduction of CLB dose in tangential intensity modulated radiotherapy (t-IMRT) for WBI using flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We generated automated planning of 20 young breast cancer patients with limited user interaction. Dose-volume histograms of the planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral lung, heart, and CLB were calculated. The dose of PTV, the most medial CLB point, and the CLB point below the nipple was measured using an ionization chamber inserted in a slab phantom. We compared the two t-IMRT plans generated by FFF beams and flattening-filter (FF) beams. RESULTS: All plans were clinically acceptable. There was no difference in the conformal index, the homogeneity for FFF was significantly worse. For the ipsilateral lung, the maximum dose (D(max)) was significantly higher; however, V(20) showed a tendency to be lower in the FFF plan. No differences were found in the D(max) and V(30) to the heart of the left breast cancer. FF planning showed significantly lower D(max) and mean dose to the CLB. In contrast to the calculation results, the measured dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple were significantly lower in FFF mode than in FF mode, with mean reductions of 21.1% and 20%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: T-IMRT planning using FFF reduced the measured out-of-field dose of the most medial CLB point and the CLB point below the nipple. Via Medica 2022-03-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8989456/ /pubmed/35402036 http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0006 Text en © 2022 Greater Poland Cancer Centre https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is available in open access under Creative Common Attribution-Non-Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) license, allowing to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially
spellingShingle Research Paper
Ogino, Ichiro
Seto, Hidetaka
Shigenaga, Daisuke
Hata, Masaharu
Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title_full Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title_fullStr Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title_full_unstemmed Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title_short Dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential IMRT planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
title_sort dose to contralateral breast from whole breast irradiation by automated tangential imrt planning: comparison of flattening-filter and flattening-filter-free modes
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402036
http://dx.doi.org/10.5603/RPOR.a2022.0006
work_keys_str_mv AT oginoichiro dosetocontralateralbreastfromwholebreastirradiationbyautomatedtangentialimrtplanningcomparisonofflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreemodes
AT setohidetaka dosetocontralateralbreastfromwholebreastirradiationbyautomatedtangentialimrtplanningcomparisonofflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreemodes
AT shigenagadaisuke dosetocontralateralbreastfromwholebreastirradiationbyautomatedtangentialimrtplanningcomparisonofflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreemodes
AT hatamasaharu dosetocontralateralbreastfromwholebreastirradiationbyautomatedtangentialimrtplanningcomparisonofflatteningfilterandflatteningfilterfreemodes