Cargando…
Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682 |
_version_ | 1784683180128731136 |
---|---|
author | Haffer, Henryk Bender, Alwina Krump, Alexander Hardt, Sebastian Winkler, Tobias Damm, Philipp |
author_facet | Haffer, Henryk Bender, Alwina Krump, Alexander Hardt, Sebastian Winkler, Tobias Damm, Philipp |
author_sort | Haffer, Henryk |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during exercises on four widely used gym machines in order to provide a source for an evidence-based patient counselling for arthroplasty surgeons. Methods: The in vivo hip joint loads in seven patients (59.6 ± 6.4 years, 28.6 ± 2.1 kg/m(2)) with instrumented hip implants were assessed. The resulting force (F(res)), bending moment (M(bend)), and torsional moment (M(tors)) were evaluated during the training on leg curl/leg extension machines (loads: 20, 30, and 40 kg), leg press machine [backrest: 10°, 30°, and 60°; load: 50, 75, and 100%BW (bodyweight)], and a rope pull machine (abduction/adduction/flexion/extension; each ipsi- and contralateral; load 10 kg). These loads were compared with the loads during walking on treadmill at 4 km/h (median peak values: F(res) 303%BW, M(bend) 4.25%BWm, and M(tors) 2.70%BWm). Results: In each of the four performed exercises with a total of 23 different load conditions or exercise modes analyzed, a significantly lower or not different load was detected with respect to F(res), M(bend), and M(tors) measured while walking with 4 km/h. Nevertheless, F(res) and M(bend) demonstrated a trend to increased loading during the ipsilateral monopod standing rope pull exercises hip flexion, extension, and abduction. Conclusion: Based on our investigation, we assume that the investigated gym machines and external loads can be considered mainly as low-impact sports (with some exceptions) and thus as safe physical activity after THA. Due to the fact that the examinations were conducted in the mean 17.4 months after THA, the applicability of the results to the immediate postoperative period is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8989469 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89894692022-04-08 Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation Haffer, Henryk Bender, Alwina Krump, Alexander Hardt, Sebastian Winkler, Tobias Damm, Philipp Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during exercises on four widely used gym machines in order to provide a source for an evidence-based patient counselling for arthroplasty surgeons. Methods: The in vivo hip joint loads in seven patients (59.6 ± 6.4 years, 28.6 ± 2.1 kg/m(2)) with instrumented hip implants were assessed. The resulting force (F(res)), bending moment (M(bend)), and torsional moment (M(tors)) were evaluated during the training on leg curl/leg extension machines (loads: 20, 30, and 40 kg), leg press machine [backrest: 10°, 30°, and 60°; load: 50, 75, and 100%BW (bodyweight)], and a rope pull machine (abduction/adduction/flexion/extension; each ipsi- and contralateral; load 10 kg). These loads were compared with the loads during walking on treadmill at 4 km/h (median peak values: F(res) 303%BW, M(bend) 4.25%BWm, and M(tors) 2.70%BWm). Results: In each of the four performed exercises with a total of 23 different load conditions or exercise modes analyzed, a significantly lower or not different load was detected with respect to F(res), M(bend), and M(tors) measured while walking with 4 km/h. Nevertheless, F(res) and M(bend) demonstrated a trend to increased loading during the ipsilateral monopod standing rope pull exercises hip flexion, extension, and abduction. Conclusion: Based on our investigation, we assume that the investigated gym machines and external loads can be considered mainly as low-impact sports (with some exceptions) and thus as safe physical activity after THA. Due to the fact that the examinations were conducted in the mean 17.4 months after THA, the applicability of the results to the immediate postoperative period is limited. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8989469/ /pubmed/35402408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682 Text en Copyright © 2022 Haffer, Bender, Krump, Hardt, Winkler and Damm. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Haffer, Henryk Bender, Alwina Krump, Alexander Hardt, Sebastian Winkler, Tobias Damm, Philipp Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title | Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title_full | Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title_fullStr | Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title_full_unstemmed | Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title_short | Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation |
title_sort | is training with gym machines safe after hip arthroplasty?—an in vivo load investigation |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989469/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hafferhenryk istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation AT benderalwina istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation AT krumpalexander istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation AT hardtsebastian istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation AT winklertobias istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation AT dammphilipp istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation |