Cargando…

Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation

Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haffer, Henryk, Bender, Alwina, Krump, Alexander, Hardt, Sebastian, Winkler, Tobias, Damm, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682
_version_ 1784683180128731136
author Haffer, Henryk
Bender, Alwina
Krump, Alexander
Hardt, Sebastian
Winkler, Tobias
Damm, Philipp
author_facet Haffer, Henryk
Bender, Alwina
Krump, Alexander
Hardt, Sebastian
Winkler, Tobias
Damm, Philipp
author_sort Haffer, Henryk
collection PubMed
description Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during exercises on four widely used gym machines in order to provide a source for an evidence-based patient counselling for arthroplasty surgeons. Methods: The in vivo hip joint loads in seven patients (59.6 ± 6.4 years, 28.6 ± 2.1 kg/m(2)) with instrumented hip implants were assessed. The resulting force (F(res)), bending moment (M(bend)), and torsional moment (M(tors)) were evaluated during the training on leg curl/leg extension machines (loads: 20, 30, and 40 kg), leg press machine [backrest: 10°, 30°, and 60°; load: 50, 75, and 100%BW (bodyweight)], and a rope pull machine (abduction/adduction/flexion/extension; each ipsi- and contralateral; load 10 kg). These loads were compared with the loads during walking on treadmill at 4 km/h (median peak values: F(res) 303%BW, M(bend) 4.25%BWm, and M(tors) 2.70%BWm). Results: In each of the four performed exercises with a total of 23 different load conditions or exercise modes analyzed, a significantly lower or not different load was detected with respect to F(res), M(bend), and M(tors) measured while walking with 4 km/h. Nevertheless, F(res) and M(bend) demonstrated a trend to increased loading during the ipsilateral monopod standing rope pull exercises hip flexion, extension, and abduction. Conclusion: Based on our investigation, we assume that the investigated gym machines and external loads can be considered mainly as low-impact sports (with some exceptions) and thus as safe physical activity after THA. Due to the fact that the examinations were conducted in the mean 17.4 months after THA, the applicability of the results to the immediate postoperative period is limited.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89894692022-04-08 Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation Haffer, Henryk Bender, Alwina Krump, Alexander Hardt, Sebastian Winkler, Tobias Damm, Philipp Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Background: Training with gym machines is one of the most popular physical activities after total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, to date, there are no evidence-based recommendations for physical activity after THA, worldwide. The aim of the study is to evaluate the in vivo hip joint loads during exercises on four widely used gym machines in order to provide a source for an evidence-based patient counselling for arthroplasty surgeons. Methods: The in vivo hip joint loads in seven patients (59.6 ± 6.4 years, 28.6 ± 2.1 kg/m(2)) with instrumented hip implants were assessed. The resulting force (F(res)), bending moment (M(bend)), and torsional moment (M(tors)) were evaluated during the training on leg curl/leg extension machines (loads: 20, 30, and 40 kg), leg press machine [backrest: 10°, 30°, and 60°; load: 50, 75, and 100%BW (bodyweight)], and a rope pull machine (abduction/adduction/flexion/extension; each ipsi- and contralateral; load 10 kg). These loads were compared with the loads during walking on treadmill at 4 km/h (median peak values: F(res) 303%BW, M(bend) 4.25%BWm, and M(tors) 2.70%BWm). Results: In each of the four performed exercises with a total of 23 different load conditions or exercise modes analyzed, a significantly lower or not different load was detected with respect to F(res), M(bend), and M(tors) measured while walking with 4 km/h. Nevertheless, F(res) and M(bend) demonstrated a trend to increased loading during the ipsilateral monopod standing rope pull exercises hip flexion, extension, and abduction. Conclusion: Based on our investigation, we assume that the investigated gym machines and external loads can be considered mainly as low-impact sports (with some exceptions) and thus as safe physical activity after THA. Due to the fact that the examinations were conducted in the mean 17.4 months after THA, the applicability of the results to the immediate postoperative period is limited. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8989469/ /pubmed/35402408 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682 Text en Copyright © 2022 Haffer, Bender, Krump, Hardt, Winkler and Damm. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Haffer, Henryk
Bender, Alwina
Krump, Alexander
Hardt, Sebastian
Winkler, Tobias
Damm, Philipp
Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title_full Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title_fullStr Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title_full_unstemmed Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title_short Is Training With Gym Machines Safe After Hip Arthroplasty?—An In Vivo Load Investigation
title_sort is training with gym machines safe after hip arthroplasty?—an in vivo load investigation
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989469/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402408
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2022.857682
work_keys_str_mv AT hafferhenryk istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation
AT benderalwina istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation
AT krumpalexander istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation
AT hardtsebastian istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation
AT winklertobias istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation
AT dammphilipp istrainingwithgymmachinessafeafterhiparthroplastyaninvivoloadinvestigation