Cargando…

Identifying the needs of our older community-based patients in the COVID era: A telephone survey

BACKGROUND: Older people's vulnerability during a pandemic may extend to social connectedness, access to healthcare, and information delivery. We sought to identify whether and how older community-based patients are maintaining connections and accessing information during COVID-19. METHODS: We...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chróinín, Danielle Ní, Hunter, Carol Lu, Shaw-Jones, Michaela, Duruchukwu, Esther, Huang, Frank, Ngov, Amy, Wang, Ashley, Yu, Alex, Shé, É Ní
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989657/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35434693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ahr.2022.100073
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Older people's vulnerability during a pandemic may extend to social connectedness, access to healthcare, and information delivery. We sought to identify whether and how older community-based patients are maintaining connections and accessing information during COVID-19. METHODS: We administered a telephone questionnaire to all patients (or carer/proxy answering ‘on patient's behalf’) who previously attended our Geriatric Medicine clinic, May-December 2019. RESULTS: Response rate was 58.8% (151/257), carer respondents comprising 23.8% (36/151). Mean patient age was 81.8 years (SD 8.6); 59.6% were female, 15.2% lived alone. English was the preferred language for 72.9% (110/151). Almost half (46.4%, 70/151) felt COVID-related restrictions had impacted them. Thirty-eight percent (58/151) reported feelings of social isolation, most (38/58) reporting this new since COVID. Nonetheless, 92.1% (139/151) reported maintaining social connections, all with family (139/139), less often with friends (69.8%, 97/139). COVID-related information sources included television 68.9% (104/151), family/friends (54.3%), healthcare providers (24.5%), and written sources (21.2%, 32/151); 12.6% used online resources. Increasing age lowered likelihood of accessing online information, while having smartphone/computer increased. Most (82.6%) believed their healthcare needs were being met, and 76.1% had accessed their GP, 87% (100/115) in-person. Only 33.1% (50/151) agreed telehealth acceptable, more often those with smartphone/computer (OR 2.15, p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce isolation and optimize connectedness and healthcare- despite physical distancing- are important during COVID-19. During a rapidly evolving pandemic, healthcare delivery and information provision to our older population is likely best served by a multifaceted approach which acknowledges identified preferences, practices and barriers.