Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In South Africa, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, such as cervical cancer and genital warts, is among the highest in the world. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent HPV vaccination for 9-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Michaeli, Daniel Tobias, Stoycheva, Sophia, Marcus, Simon Mashudu, Zhang, Wenjia, Michaeli, Julia Caroline, Michaeli, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6
_version_ 1784683280140861440
author Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
Stoycheva, Sophia
Marcus, Simon Mashudu
Zhang, Wenjia
Michaeli, Julia Caroline
Michaeli, Thomas
author_facet Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
Stoycheva, Sophia
Marcus, Simon Mashudu
Zhang, Wenjia
Michaeli, Julia Caroline
Michaeli, Thomas
author_sort Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In South Africa, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, such as cervical cancer and genital warts, is among the highest in the world. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent HPV vaccination for 9- to 14-year-old girls from the South African healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model portraying the natural HPV disease progression from high-risk infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II/III, or cervical cancer and from low-risk infection to genital warts was built. Transition probability, utility, and efficacy data were sourced from peer-reviewed literature. Vaccination costs were calculated based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The model was populated with a cohort of 520,000 9-year-old girls to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in South African Rand (R) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for each vaccination strategy. RESULTS: All HPV vaccination strategies dominate the no vaccine strategy. Compared with the bivalent vaccine, the nonavalent strategy increases QALYs by 0.14 and costs by R1793 (ICER: R13,013 per QALY) per person, while the quadrivalent vaccination provides −0.02 incremental QALYs and R1748 costs (ICER: −R116,397 per QALY). Consequently, at the South African willingness-to-pay threshold of R23,630 per QALY, nonavalent vaccination is the preferred strategy, with a probability of 90.2%. Scenario analysis demonstrated that results are influenced by vaccine coverage, efficacy, and duration of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of nonavalent for bivalent HPV vaccination is a cost-effective intervention in South Africa. HPV vaccination should be part of a multifaceted public health strategy entailing screening, condoms, and education of all stakeholders to reduce the significant burden of sexual transmitted diseases in South Africa. Sex-neutral and catch-up vaccinations are subjects for further research. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89899372022-04-22 Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa Michaeli, Daniel Tobias Stoycheva, Sophia Marcus, Simon Mashudu Zhang, Wenjia Michaeli, Julia Caroline Michaeli, Thomas Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In South Africa, the prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) and associated diseases, such as cervical cancer and genital warts, is among the highest in the world. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent HPV vaccination for 9- to 14-year-old girls from the South African healthcare system perspective. METHODS: A Markov model portraying the natural HPV disease progression from high-risk infection to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) I, CIN II/III, or cervical cancer and from low-risk infection to genital warts was built. Transition probability, utility, and efficacy data were sourced from peer-reviewed literature. Vaccination costs were calculated based on the World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines. The model was populated with a cohort of 520,000 9-year-old girls to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER) in South African Rand (R) per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained for each vaccination strategy. RESULTS: All HPV vaccination strategies dominate the no vaccine strategy. Compared with the bivalent vaccine, the nonavalent strategy increases QALYs by 0.14 and costs by R1793 (ICER: R13,013 per QALY) per person, while the quadrivalent vaccination provides −0.02 incremental QALYs and R1748 costs (ICER: −R116,397 per QALY). Consequently, at the South African willingness-to-pay threshold of R23,630 per QALY, nonavalent vaccination is the preferred strategy, with a probability of 90.2%. Scenario analysis demonstrated that results are influenced by vaccine coverage, efficacy, and duration of efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of nonavalent for bivalent HPV vaccination is a cost-effective intervention in South Africa. HPV vaccination should be part of a multifaceted public health strategy entailing screening, condoms, and education of all stakeholders to reduce the significant burden of sexual transmitted diseases in South Africa. Sex-neutral and catch-up vaccinations are subjects for further research. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT: [Image: see text] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6. Springer International Publishing 2022-03-16 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8989937/ /pubmed/35294726 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Michaeli, Daniel Tobias
Stoycheva, Sophia
Marcus, Simon Mashudu
Zhang, Wenjia
Michaeli, Julia Caroline
Michaeli, Thomas
Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title_full Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title_short Cost-Effectiveness of Bivalent, Quadrivalent, and Nonavalent HPV Vaccination in South Africa
title_sort cost-effectiveness of bivalent, quadrivalent, and nonavalent hpv vaccination in south africa
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35294726
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01138-6
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelidanieltobias costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT stoychevasophia costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT marcussimonmashudu costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT zhangwenjia costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT michaelijuliacaroline costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica
AT michaelithomas costeffectivenessofbivalentquadrivalentandnonavalenthpvvaccinationinsouthafrica