Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of large-scale clinical trials, the treatment strategies of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are controversial, especially for stage II patients. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, few lymph nodes (LNs) examined (<5 for duodenum or...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Zhen, Liu, Kun, Gao, Jiale, Jing, Chao, Ma, Yanhong, Zheng, Shu, Shan, Jianzhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.865745
_version_ 1784683284515520512
author Liu, Zhen
Liu, Kun
Gao, Jiale
Jing, Chao
Ma, Yanhong
Zheng, Shu
Shan, Jianzhen
author_facet Liu, Zhen
Liu, Kun
Gao, Jiale
Jing, Chao
Ma, Yanhong
Zheng, Shu
Shan, Jianzhen
author_sort Liu, Zhen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of large-scale clinical trials, the treatment strategies of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are controversial, especially for stage II patients. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, few lymph nodes (LNs) examined (<5 for duodenum or <8 for jejunal/ileal primary location) are one of the high-risk features for stage II patients, for whom adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. This consensus is originally drawn from data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database (SEER) between 1988 and 2010. However, the surgical modalities and chemotherapy strategies changed a lot after 2004 for SBA patients. The previous data may not represent a true picture of current therapeutics. Thus, we reanalyzed the SEER database and updated the cutoff point of LN numbers resected with respect to cancer-specific survival (CSS) using the latest SEER information. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage II SBA and who underwent curative surgery between 2004 and 2018 were extracted from the SEER database. CSS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Maximum survival differences based on total LNs examined for duodenal and jejunoileal tumors were determined separately with the cut-point analysis and maximum log-rank χ(2) statistic. A nomogram model was constructed based on the multivariate Cox analysis to predict 5‐ and 10‐year CSS and was then validated with an internal cohort. RESULTS: A total of 935 stage II SBA patients met the inclusion criteria. The greatest difference in survival was found in patients who had removal of at least 5 LNs for duodenal and 12 LNs for jejunoileal tumors. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age, T stage, histology grade, primary site, and LN numbers were independent prognostic factors for survival. The C index of nomogram model was 0.701 (95% CI, 0.661–0.741, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of LNs harvested is an important prognostic factor for survival in stage II SBA patients. LN number examined <5 remains a high-risk factor for duodenum, but the cutoff point for jejunal/ileal tumors should rise from 8 to 12. Appropriate radical lymphadenectomy should be performed in stage II SBA surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8989959
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89899592022-04-09 Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database Liu, Zhen Liu, Kun Gao, Jiale Jing, Chao Ma, Yanhong Zheng, Shu Shan, Jianzhen Front Oncol Oncology BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of large-scale clinical trials, the treatment strategies of small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are controversial, especially for stage II patients. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline, few lymph nodes (LNs) examined (<5 for duodenum or <8 for jejunal/ileal primary location) are one of the high-risk features for stage II patients, for whom adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended. This consensus is originally drawn from data in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database (SEER) between 1988 and 2010. However, the surgical modalities and chemotherapy strategies changed a lot after 2004 for SBA patients. The previous data may not represent a true picture of current therapeutics. Thus, we reanalyzed the SEER database and updated the cutoff point of LN numbers resected with respect to cancer-specific survival (CSS) using the latest SEER information. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with stage II SBA and who underwent curative surgery between 2004 and 2018 were extracted from the SEER database. CSS was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Maximum survival differences based on total LNs examined for duodenal and jejunoileal tumors were determined separately with the cut-point analysis and maximum log-rank χ(2) statistic. A nomogram model was constructed based on the multivariate Cox analysis to predict 5‐ and 10‐year CSS and was then validated with an internal cohort. RESULTS: A total of 935 stage II SBA patients met the inclusion criteria. The greatest difference in survival was found in patients who had removal of at least 5 LNs for duodenal and 12 LNs for jejunoileal tumors. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that age, T stage, histology grade, primary site, and LN numbers were independent prognostic factors for survival. The C index of nomogram model was 0.701 (95% CI, 0.661–0.741, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The number of LNs harvested is an important prognostic factor for survival in stage II SBA patients. LN number examined <5 remains a high-risk factor for duodenum, but the cutoff point for jejunal/ileal tumors should rise from 8 to 12. Appropriate radical lymphadenectomy should be performed in stage II SBA surgery. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8989959/ /pubmed/35402228 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.865745 Text en Copyright © 2022 Liu, Liu, Gao, Jing, Ma, Zheng and Shan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Liu, Zhen
Liu, Kun
Gao, Jiale
Jing, Chao
Ma, Yanhong
Zheng, Shu
Shan, Jianzhen
Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title_full Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title_short Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Evaluation in Stage II Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma: An Updated Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
title_sort prognostic value of lymph node evaluation in stage ii small bowel adenocarcinoma: an updated analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and end results database
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8989959/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402228
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.865745
work_keys_str_mv AT liuzhen prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT liukun prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT gaojiale prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT jingchao prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT mayanhong prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT zhengshu prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase
AT shanjianzhen prognosticvalueoflymphnodeevaluationinstageiismallboweladenocarcinomaanupdatedanalysisofsurveillanceepidemiologyandendresultsdatabase