Cargando…

Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib

Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ikeda, Daisuke, Terao, Toshiki, Miura, Daisuke, Narita, Kentaro, Fukumoto, Ami, Kuzume, Ayumi, Kamura, Yuya, Tabata, Rikako, Tsushima, Takafumi, Takeuchi, Masami, Hosoki, Takaaki, Matsue, Kosei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537
_version_ 1784683297961410560
author Ikeda, Daisuke
Terao, Toshiki
Miura, Daisuke
Narita, Kentaro
Fukumoto, Ami
Kuzume, Ayumi
Kamura, Yuya
Tabata, Rikako
Tsushima, Takafumi
Takeuchi, Masami
Hosoki, Takaaki
Matsue, Kosei
author_facet Ikeda, Daisuke
Terao, Toshiki
Miura, Daisuke
Narita, Kentaro
Fukumoto, Ami
Kuzume, Ayumi
Kamura, Yuya
Tabata, Rikako
Tsushima, Takafumi
Takeuchi, Masami
Hosoki, Takaaki
Matsue, Kosei
author_sort Ikeda, Daisuke
collection PubMed
description Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in MPN patients. A total of 74 patients with MPN and 81 healthy controls who were vaccinated were enrolled in the study. Of the MPN patients, 27% received ruxolitinib at the time of vaccination. Notably, MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had a 30-fold lower median anti-S Ab level than those not receiving ruxolitinib (p < 0.001). Further, the anti-S Ab levels in MPN patients not receiving ruxolitinib were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Regarding a clinical protective titre that has been shown to correlate with preventing symptomatic infection, only 10% of the MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had the protective value. Univariate analysis revealed that ruxolitinib, myelofibrosis, and longer time from diagnosis to vaccination had a significantly negative impact on achieving the protective value (p = 0.001, 0.021, and 0.019, respectively). In subgroup analysis, lower numbers of CD3(+) and CD4(+) lymphocytes were significantly correlated with a lower probability of obtaining the protective value (p = 0.011 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our results highlight ruxolitinib-induced impaired vaccine response and the necessity of booster immunisation in MPN patients. Moreover, T-cell mediated immunity may have an important role in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in patients with MPN, though further studies are warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8990027
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89900272022-04-09 Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib Ikeda, Daisuke Terao, Toshiki Miura, Daisuke Narita, Kentaro Fukumoto, Ami Kuzume, Ayumi Kamura, Yuya Tabata, Rikako Tsushima, Takafumi Takeuchi, Masami Hosoki, Takaaki Matsue, Kosei Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in MPN patients. A total of 74 patients with MPN and 81 healthy controls who were vaccinated were enrolled in the study. Of the MPN patients, 27% received ruxolitinib at the time of vaccination. Notably, MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had a 30-fold lower median anti-S Ab level than those not receiving ruxolitinib (p < 0.001). Further, the anti-S Ab levels in MPN patients not receiving ruxolitinib were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Regarding a clinical protective titre that has been shown to correlate with preventing symptomatic infection, only 10% of the MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had the protective value. Univariate analysis revealed that ruxolitinib, myelofibrosis, and longer time from diagnosis to vaccination had a significantly negative impact on achieving the protective value (p = 0.001, 0.021, and 0.019, respectively). In subgroup analysis, lower numbers of CD3(+) and CD4(+) lymphocytes were significantly correlated with a lower probability of obtaining the protective value (p = 0.011 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our results highlight ruxolitinib-induced impaired vaccine response and the necessity of booster immunisation in MPN patients. Moreover, T-cell mediated immunity may have an important role in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in patients with MPN, though further studies are warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8990027/ /pubmed/35402455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ikeda, Terao, Miura, Narita, Fukumoto, Kuzume, Kamura, Tabata, Tsushima, Takeuchi, Hosoki and Matsue. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Ikeda, Daisuke
Terao, Toshiki
Miura, Daisuke
Narita, Kentaro
Fukumoto, Ami
Kuzume, Ayumi
Kamura, Yuya
Tabata, Rikako
Tsushima, Takafumi
Takeuchi, Masami
Hosoki, Takaaki
Matsue, Kosei
Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title_full Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title_fullStr Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title_full_unstemmed Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title_short Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
title_sort impaired antibody response following the second dose of the bnt162b2 vaccine in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving ruxolitinib
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990027/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402455
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537
work_keys_str_mv AT ikedadaisuke impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT teraotoshiki impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT miuradaisuke impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT naritakentaro impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT fukumotoami impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT kuzumeayumi impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT kamurayuya impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT tabatarikako impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT tsushimatakafumi impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT takeuchimasami impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT hosokitakaaki impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib
AT matsuekosei impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib