Cargando…
Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib
Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537 |
_version_ | 1784683297961410560 |
---|---|
author | Ikeda, Daisuke Terao, Toshiki Miura, Daisuke Narita, Kentaro Fukumoto, Ami Kuzume, Ayumi Kamura, Yuya Tabata, Rikako Tsushima, Takafumi Takeuchi, Masami Hosoki, Takaaki Matsue, Kosei |
author_facet | Ikeda, Daisuke Terao, Toshiki Miura, Daisuke Narita, Kentaro Fukumoto, Ami Kuzume, Ayumi Kamura, Yuya Tabata, Rikako Tsushima, Takafumi Takeuchi, Masami Hosoki, Takaaki Matsue, Kosei |
author_sort | Ikeda, Daisuke |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in MPN patients. A total of 74 patients with MPN and 81 healthy controls who were vaccinated were enrolled in the study. Of the MPN patients, 27% received ruxolitinib at the time of vaccination. Notably, MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had a 30-fold lower median anti-S Ab level than those not receiving ruxolitinib (p < 0.001). Further, the anti-S Ab levels in MPN patients not receiving ruxolitinib were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Regarding a clinical protective titre that has been shown to correlate with preventing symptomatic infection, only 10% of the MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had the protective value. Univariate analysis revealed that ruxolitinib, myelofibrosis, and longer time from diagnosis to vaccination had a significantly negative impact on achieving the protective value (p = 0.001, 0.021, and 0.019, respectively). In subgroup analysis, lower numbers of CD3(+) and CD4(+) lymphocytes were significantly correlated with a lower probability of obtaining the protective value (p = 0.011 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our results highlight ruxolitinib-induced impaired vaccine response and the necessity of booster immunisation in MPN patients. Moreover, T-cell mediated immunity may have an important role in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in patients with MPN, though further studies are warranted. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8990027 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89900272022-04-09 Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib Ikeda, Daisuke Terao, Toshiki Miura, Daisuke Narita, Kentaro Fukumoto, Ami Kuzume, Ayumi Kamura, Yuya Tabata, Rikako Tsushima, Takafumi Takeuchi, Masami Hosoki, Takaaki Matsue, Kosei Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine Data on the effect of ruxolitinib on antibody response to severe acute respiratory coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) is lacking. We prospectively evaluated anti-spike-receptor binding domain antibody (anti-S Ab) levels after the second dose of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in MPN patients. A total of 74 patients with MPN and 81 healthy controls who were vaccinated were enrolled in the study. Of the MPN patients, 27% received ruxolitinib at the time of vaccination. Notably, MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had a 30-fold lower median anti-S Ab level than those not receiving ruxolitinib (p < 0.001). Further, the anti-S Ab levels in MPN patients not receiving ruxolitinib were significantly lower than those in healthy controls (p < 0.001). Regarding a clinical protective titre that has been shown to correlate with preventing symptomatic infection, only 10% of the MPN patients receiving ruxolitinib had the protective value. Univariate analysis revealed that ruxolitinib, myelofibrosis, and longer time from diagnosis to vaccination had a significantly negative impact on achieving the protective value (p = 0.001, 0.021, and 0.019, respectively). In subgroup analysis, lower numbers of CD3(+) and CD4(+) lymphocytes were significantly correlated with a lower probability of obtaining the protective value (p = 0.011 and 0.001, respectively). In conclusion, our results highlight ruxolitinib-induced impaired vaccine response and the necessity of booster immunisation in MPN patients. Moreover, T-cell mediated immunity may have an important role in the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in patients with MPN, though further studies are warranted. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8990027/ /pubmed/35402455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ikeda, Terao, Miura, Narita, Fukumoto, Kuzume, Kamura, Tabata, Tsushima, Takeuchi, Hosoki and Matsue. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Ikeda, Daisuke Terao, Toshiki Miura, Daisuke Narita, Kentaro Fukumoto, Ami Kuzume, Ayumi Kamura, Yuya Tabata, Rikako Tsushima, Takafumi Takeuchi, Masami Hosoki, Takaaki Matsue, Kosei Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title | Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title_full | Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title_fullStr | Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title_full_unstemmed | Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title_short | Impaired Antibody Response Following the Second Dose of the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients With Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Receiving Ruxolitinib |
title_sort | impaired antibody response following the second dose of the bnt162b2 vaccine in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms receiving ruxolitinib |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990027/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35402455 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.826537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ikedadaisuke impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT teraotoshiki impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT miuradaisuke impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT naritakentaro impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT fukumotoami impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT kuzumeayumi impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT kamurayuya impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT tabatarikako impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT tsushimatakafumi impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT takeuchimasami impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT hosokitakaaki impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib AT matsuekosei impairedantibodyresponsefollowingtheseconddoseofthebnt162b2vaccineinpatientswithmyeloproliferativeneoplasmsreceivingruxolitinib |