Cargando…

Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND: Antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have recently shown promising results in gastric cancer (GC). However, clinicians still lack predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy; thus, we investigated the expression of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xinhua, Zhang, Huimin, Wang, Minghao, Liu, Hao, Hu, Yanfeng, Lin, Tian, Chen, Hao, Zhao, Mingli, Chen, Tao, Li, Guoxin, Yu, Jiang, Zhao, Liying
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.783695
_version_ 1784683338309566464
author Chen, Xinhua
Zhang, Huimin
Wang, Minghao
Liu, Hao
Hu, Yanfeng
Lin, Tian
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Mingli
Chen, Tao
Li, Guoxin
Yu, Jiang
Zhao, Liying
author_facet Chen, Xinhua
Zhang, Huimin
Wang, Minghao
Liu, Hao
Hu, Yanfeng
Lin, Tian
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Mingli
Chen, Tao
Li, Guoxin
Yu, Jiang
Zhao, Liying
author_sort Chen, Xinhua
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have recently shown promising results in gastric cancer (GC). However, clinicians still lack predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy; thus, we investigated the expression of PD-L1 in GC and further assessed its clinical relevance with other clinicopathological features. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 968 consecutive GC cases from Nanfang Hospital between November 2018 and August 2021. Discrepancy in the combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1 protein expression between gastric mucosa biopsy and postoperative pathology were investigated. Correlations between CPS and clinicopathological parameters were determined using chi-squared test, multiple logistic aggression analysis, and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 968 consecutive GC patients, 199 who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy or immunotherapy were tested for CPS both in gastric mucosa biopsy and postoperative pathology, and the results showed that the CPS of gastric mucosa biopsy was significantly lower than that of postoperative pathology [mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 17.4; M(IQR): 2(5) vs. 5(12), p<0.001)]. 62.3% of patients (579/930) had CPS≥ 1, 49.2% of patients (458/930) had CPS≥5, and 33.3% of patients (310/930) had CPS≥10. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) status was seen in 6.1% of patients (56 of 919). Positive Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) status was detected in 4.4% of patients (38 of 854). The patients with CPS≥1/CPS≥5/CPS≥10 were significantly independently correlated with age, Lauren classification, Ki-67 index, and EBV status. According to linear regression analysis, PD-L1 expression was correlated with age (p<0.001), Ki-67 index (p<0.001), EBV (p<0.001), and Lauren classification (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that PD-L1 expression has Intratumoral heterogeneity in GC. Furthermore, the variables of age, Ki-67 index, and Lauren classification, which are common and accessible in most hospitals, are worth exploring as potential biomarkers for anti-PD-1 therapy in GC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8990248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89902482022-04-09 Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients Chen, Xinhua Zhang, Huimin Wang, Minghao Liu, Hao Hu, Yanfeng Lin, Tian Chen, Hao Zhao, Mingli Chen, Tao Li, Guoxin Yu, Jiang Zhao, Liying Front Immunol Immunology BACKGROUND: Antibodies against programmed death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) have recently shown promising results in gastric cancer (GC). However, clinicians still lack predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy; thus, we investigated the expression of PD-L1 in GC and further assessed its clinical relevance with other clinicopathological features. METHODS: We retrospectively collected clinical data on 968 consecutive GC cases from Nanfang Hospital between November 2018 and August 2021. Discrepancy in the combined positive score (CPS) of PD-L1 protein expression between gastric mucosa biopsy and postoperative pathology were investigated. Correlations between CPS and clinicopathological parameters were determined using chi-squared test, multiple logistic aggression analysis, and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Among the 968 consecutive GC patients, 199 who did not receive preoperative chemotherapy or immunotherapy were tested for CPS both in gastric mucosa biopsy and postoperative pathology, and the results showed that the CPS of gastric mucosa biopsy was significantly lower than that of postoperative pathology [mean ± SD: 5.5 ± 9.4 vs. 13.3 ± 17.4; M(IQR): 2(5) vs. 5(12), p<0.001)]. 62.3% of patients (579/930) had CPS≥ 1, 49.2% of patients (458/930) had CPS≥5, and 33.3% of patients (310/930) had CPS≥10. Mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) status was seen in 6.1% of patients (56 of 919). Positive Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) status was detected in 4.4% of patients (38 of 854). The patients with CPS≥1/CPS≥5/CPS≥10 were significantly independently correlated with age, Lauren classification, Ki-67 index, and EBV status. According to linear regression analysis, PD-L1 expression was correlated with age (p<0.001), Ki-67 index (p<0.001), EBV (p<0.001), and Lauren classification (p=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirmed that PD-L1 expression has Intratumoral heterogeneity in GC. Furthermore, the variables of age, Ki-67 index, and Lauren classification, which are common and accessible in most hospitals, are worth exploring as potential biomarkers for anti-PD-1 therapy in GC. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8990248/ /pubmed/35401534 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.783695 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhang, Wang, Liu, Hu, Lin, Chen, Zhao, Chen, Li, Yu and Zhao https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Chen, Xinhua
Zhang, Huimin
Wang, Minghao
Liu, Hao
Hu, Yanfeng
Lin, Tian
Chen, Hao
Zhao, Mingli
Chen, Tao
Li, Guoxin
Yu, Jiang
Zhao, Liying
Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title_full Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title_short Relationship Between Programmed Death Ligand 1 Expression and Other Clinicopathological Features in a Large Cohort of Gastric Cancer Patients
title_sort relationship between programmed death ligand 1 expression and other clinicopathological features in a large cohort of gastric cancer patients
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35401534
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.783695
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxinhua relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT zhanghuimin relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT wangminghao relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT liuhao relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT huyanfeng relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT lintian relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT chenhao relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT zhaomingli relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT chentao relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT liguoxin relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT yujiang relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients
AT zhaoliying relationshipbetweenprogrammeddeathligand1expressionandotherclinicopathologicalfeaturesinalargecohortofgastriccancerpatients