Cargando…

Differences in training among prehospital emergency physicians in Germany

BACKGROUND: Germany has an interdisciplinary physician-based emergency medical service. Differences in training likely lead to different levels of expertise. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the number of manual procedures performed at the completion of training to determine level of experience of prehospita...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bollinger, Matthias, Mathee, C., Shapeton, A. D., Thal, S. C., Russo, S. G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990269/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35431644
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10049-022-01021-z
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Germany has an interdisciplinary physician-based emergency medical service. Differences in training likely lead to different levels of expertise. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the number of manual procedures performed at the completion of training to determine level of experience of prehospital emergency physicians of different primary specialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Immediately after passing the board examination each examinee was asked to estimate the number of performed procedures for 26 manual skills. We compared the results with recommendations and data on learning manual skills. Results are presented as mean (standard deviation). RESULTS: Endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy was performed 1032 (739) times by anesthesiologists. Surgeons and internists performed 89 (89) and 77 (65) intubations, respectively. Intubation via video laryngoscopy was performed 79 (81) times by anesthesiologists, 11 (17) times by surgeons and 6 (11) times by internists. Surgeons had little experience in non-invasive ventilation, with 9 (19) performed procedures and had rarely used external pacemaker therapy or electrical cardioversion. In comparison, among all participants non-invasive ventilation was performed 152 (197) times, electrical cardioversion was performed 41 (103) times and an external pacemaker was used 6 (15) times. For other procedures the numbers did not markedly differ between the different specialties. CONCLUSION: The number of performed procedures markedly differed for some skills between different primary specialties. Recommendations regarding a procedural volume were not always met, suggesting missing expertise for some skills. A defined number of procedures should therefore be a formal requirement to be eligible for board certification in prehospital emergency medicine.