Cargando…

Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures

[Image: see text] Li metal is an exciting anode for high-energy Li-ion batteries and other future battery technologies due to its high energy density and low redox potential. Despite their high promise, the commercialization of Li-metal-based batteries has been hampered due to the formation of dendr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeon, Joonyeob, Yoon, Gil Ho, Vegge, Tejs, Chang, Jin Hyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00900
_version_ 1784683393066205184
author Jeon, Joonyeob
Yoon, Gil Ho
Vegge, Tejs
Chang, Jin Hyun
author_facet Jeon, Joonyeob
Yoon, Gil Ho
Vegge, Tejs
Chang, Jin Hyun
author_sort Jeon, Joonyeob
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Li metal is an exciting anode for high-energy Li-ion batteries and other future battery technologies due to its high energy density and low redox potential. Despite their high promise, the commercialization of Li-metal-based batteries has been hampered due to the formation of dendrites that lead to mechanical instability, energy loss, and eventual internal short circuits. In recent years, the mechanism of dendrite formation and the strategies to suppress their growth have been studied intensely. However, the effect of applied overpotential and operating temperature on dendrite formation and their growth rate remains to be fully understood. Here, we elucidate the correlation between the applied overpotential and operating temperature to the dendrite height and tortuosity of the Li-metal surface during electrodeposition using phase-field model simulations. We identify an optimal operating temperature of a half-cell consisting of a Li metal anode and 1 M LiPF(6) in EC/DMC (1/1), which increases gradually as the magnitude of the overpotential increases. The investigation reveals that the temperature dependence identified in the simulations and experiments often disagree because they are primarily conducted under galvanostatic and potentiostatic conditions, respectively. The temperature increase under potentiostatic conditions increases the induced current while it decreases the induced overpotential under galvanostatic conditions. Therefore, the analysis and comparison of temperature-dependent characteristics must be carried out with care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8990521
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89905212022-04-08 Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures Jeon, Joonyeob Yoon, Gil Ho Vegge, Tejs Chang, Jin Hyun ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Li metal is an exciting anode for high-energy Li-ion batteries and other future battery technologies due to its high energy density and low redox potential. Despite their high promise, the commercialization of Li-metal-based batteries has been hampered due to the formation of dendrites that lead to mechanical instability, energy loss, and eventual internal short circuits. In recent years, the mechanism of dendrite formation and the strategies to suppress their growth have been studied intensely. However, the effect of applied overpotential and operating temperature on dendrite formation and their growth rate remains to be fully understood. Here, we elucidate the correlation between the applied overpotential and operating temperature to the dendrite height and tortuosity of the Li-metal surface during electrodeposition using phase-field model simulations. We identify an optimal operating temperature of a half-cell consisting of a Li metal anode and 1 M LiPF(6) in EC/DMC (1/1), which increases gradually as the magnitude of the overpotential increases. The investigation reveals that the temperature dependence identified in the simulations and experiments often disagree because they are primarily conducted under galvanostatic and potentiostatic conditions, respectively. The temperature increase under potentiostatic conditions increases the induced current while it decreases the induced overpotential under galvanostatic conditions. Therefore, the analysis and comparison of temperature-dependent characteristics must be carried out with care. American Chemical Society 2022-03-28 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC8990521/ /pubmed/35344661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00900 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Jeon, Joonyeob
Yoon, Gil Ho
Vegge, Tejs
Chang, Jin Hyun
Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title_full Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title_fullStr Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title_full_unstemmed Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title_short Phase-Field Investigation of Lithium Electrodeposition at Different Applied Overpotentials and Operating Temperatures
title_sort phase-field investigation of lithium electrodeposition at different applied overpotentials and operating temperatures
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990521/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35344661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00900
work_keys_str_mv AT jeonjoonyeob phasefieldinvestigationoflithiumelectrodepositionatdifferentappliedoverpotentialsandoperatingtemperatures
AT yoongilho phasefieldinvestigationoflithiumelectrodepositionatdifferentappliedoverpotentialsandoperatingtemperatures
AT veggetejs phasefieldinvestigationoflithiumelectrodepositionatdifferentappliedoverpotentialsandoperatingtemperatures
AT changjinhyun phasefieldinvestigationoflithiumelectrodepositionatdifferentappliedoverpotentialsandoperatingtemperatures