Cargando…

Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial

OBJECTIVES: The BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett’s oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maroni, Roberta, Barnes, Jessica, Offman, Judith, Scheibl, Fiona, Smith, Samuel G, Debiram-Beecham, Irene, Waller, Jo, Sasieni, Peter, Fitzgerald, Rebecca C, Rubin, Greg, Walter, Fiona M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258
_version_ 1784683433015902208
author Maroni, Roberta
Barnes, Jessica
Offman, Judith
Scheibl, Fiona
Smith, Samuel G
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Waller, Jo
Sasieni, Peter
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
author_facet Maroni, Roberta
Barnes, Jessica
Offman, Judith
Scheibl, Fiona
Smith, Samuel G
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Waller, Jo
Sasieni, Peter
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
author_sort Maroni, Roberta
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett’s oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested study, our aim was to understand patient experiences. DESIGN: Mixed-methods using questionnaires (including Inventory to Assess Patient Satisfaction, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 and two-item perceived risk) and interviews. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant satisfaction, anxiety and perceived risk of developing OAC. SETTING: General practices in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acid reflux enrolled in the intervention arm of the BEST3 trial and attending the Cytosponge appointment (N=1750). RESULTS: 1488 patients successfully swallowing the Cytosponge completed the follow-up questionnaires, while 30 were interviewed, including some with an unsuccessful swallow. Overall, participants were satisfied with the Cytosponge test. Several items showed positive ratings, in particular convenience and accessibility, staff’s interpersonal skills and perceived technical competence. The most discomfort was reported during the Cytosponge removal, with more than 60% of participants experiencing gagging. Nevertheless, about 80% were willing to have the procedure again or to recommend it to friends; this was true even for participants experiencing discomfort, as confirmed in the interviews. Median anxiety scores were below the predefined level of clinically significant anxiety and slightly decreased between baseline and follow-up (p < 0.001). Interviews revealed concerns around the ability to swallow, participating in a clinical trial, and waiting for test results. The perceived risk of OAC increased following the Cytosponge appointment (p<0.001). Moreover, interviews suggested that some participants had trouble conceptualising risk and did not understand the relationships between test results, gastro-oesophageal reflux and risk of Barrett’s oesophagus and OAC. CONCLUSIONS: When delivered during a trial in primary care, the Cytosponge is well accepted and causes little anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN68382401.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8990713
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89907132022-04-27 Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial Maroni, Roberta Barnes, Jessica Offman, Judith Scheibl, Fiona Smith, Samuel G Debiram-Beecham, Irene Waller, Jo Sasieni, Peter Fitzgerald, Rebecca C Rubin, Greg Walter, Fiona M BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: The BEST3 trial demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the Cytosponge-trefoil factor 3, a cell collection device coupled with the biomarker trefoil factor 3, as a tool for detecting Barrett’s oesophagus, a precursor of oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC), in primary care. In this nested study, our aim was to understand patient experiences. DESIGN: Mixed-methods using questionnaires (including Inventory to Assess Patient Satisfaction, Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 and two-item perceived risk) and interviews. OUTCOME MEASURES: Participant satisfaction, anxiety and perceived risk of developing OAC. SETTING: General practices in England. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with acid reflux enrolled in the intervention arm of the BEST3 trial and attending the Cytosponge appointment (N=1750). RESULTS: 1488 patients successfully swallowing the Cytosponge completed the follow-up questionnaires, while 30 were interviewed, including some with an unsuccessful swallow. Overall, participants were satisfied with the Cytosponge test. Several items showed positive ratings, in particular convenience and accessibility, staff’s interpersonal skills and perceived technical competence. The most discomfort was reported during the Cytosponge removal, with more than 60% of participants experiencing gagging. Nevertheless, about 80% were willing to have the procedure again or to recommend it to friends; this was true even for participants experiencing discomfort, as confirmed in the interviews. Median anxiety scores were below the predefined level of clinically significant anxiety and slightly decreased between baseline and follow-up (p < 0.001). Interviews revealed concerns around the ability to swallow, participating in a clinical trial, and waiting for test results. The perceived risk of OAC increased following the Cytosponge appointment (p<0.001). Moreover, interviews suggested that some participants had trouble conceptualising risk and did not understand the relationships between test results, gastro-oesophageal reflux and risk of Barrett’s oesophagus and OAC. CONCLUSIONS: When delivered during a trial in primary care, the Cytosponge is well accepted and causes little anxiety. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN68382401. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8990713/ /pubmed/35393308 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Maroni, Roberta
Barnes, Jessica
Offman, Judith
Scheibl, Fiona
Smith, Samuel G
Debiram-Beecham, Irene
Waller, Jo
Sasieni, Peter
Fitzgerald, Rebecca C
Rubin, Greg
Walter, Fiona M
Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title_full Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title_fullStr Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title_full_unstemmed Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title_short Patient-reported experiences and views on the Cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the BEST3 trial
title_sort patient-reported experiences and views on the cytosponge test: a mixed-methods analysis from the best3 trial
topic Gastroenterology and Hepatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990713/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35393308
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054258
work_keys_str_mv AT maroniroberta patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT barnesjessica patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT offmanjudith patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT scheiblfiona patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT smithsamuelg patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT debirambeechamirene patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT wallerjo patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT sasienipeter patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT fitzgeraldrebeccac patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT rubingreg patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial
AT walterfionam patientreportedexperiencesandviewsonthecytospongetestamixedmethodsanalysisfromthebest3trial