Cargando…
The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma
BACKGROUND: It is not known whether there is a survival benefit associated with more frequent surveillance imaging in patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate distant disease-free survival (DDFS), melanoma-speci...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3 |
_version_ | 1784683486365351936 |
---|---|
author | Dieng, Mbathio Lord, Sarah J. Turner, Robin M. Nieweg, Omgo E. Menzies, Alexander M. Saw, Robyn P. M. Einstein, Andrew J. Emmett, Louise Thompson, John F. Lo, Serigne N. Morton, Rachael L. |
author_facet | Dieng, Mbathio Lord, Sarah J. Turner, Robin M. Nieweg, Omgo E. Menzies, Alexander M. Saw, Robyn P. M. Einstein, Andrew J. Emmett, Louise Thompson, John F. Lo, Serigne N. Morton, Rachael L. |
author_sort | Dieng, Mbathio |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It is not known whether there is a survival benefit associated with more frequent surveillance imaging in patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate distant disease-free survival (DDFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), post distant recurrence MSS (dMSS), and overall survival for patients with resected stage III melanoma undergoing regular computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT surveillance imaging at different intervals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A closely followed longitudinal cohort of patients with resected stage IIIA–D disease treated at a tertiary referral center underwent 3- to 4-monthly, 6-monthly, or 12-monthly surveillance imaging between 2000 and 2017. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank tests assessed the significance of survival differences between imaging frequency groups. RESULTS: Of 473 patients (IIIA, 19%; IIIB, 31%; IIIC, 49%; IIID, 1%) 30% underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging, 10% underwent 6-monthly imaging, and 60% underwent 12-monthly imaging. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, distant recurrence was recorded in 252 patients (53%), with 40% detected by surveillance CT or PET/CT, 43% detected clinically, and 17% with another imaging modality. Median DDFS was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval 3.9–6.6). Among 139 IIIC patients who developed distant disease, the median dMSS was 4.4 months shorter in those who underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging than those who underwent 12-monthly imaging. CONCLUSION: Selecting patients at higher risk of distant recurrence for more frequent surveillance imaging yields a higher proportion of imaging-detected distant recurrences but is not associated with improved survival. A randomized comparison of low versus high frequency imaging is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8990943 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89909432022-04-22 The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma Dieng, Mbathio Lord, Sarah J. Turner, Robin M. Nieweg, Omgo E. Menzies, Alexander M. Saw, Robyn P. M. Einstein, Andrew J. Emmett, Louise Thompson, John F. Lo, Serigne N. Morton, Rachael L. Ann Surg Oncol Melanoma BACKGROUND: It is not known whether there is a survival benefit associated with more frequent surveillance imaging in patients with resected American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III melanoma. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate distant disease-free survival (DDFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), post distant recurrence MSS (dMSS), and overall survival for patients with resected stage III melanoma undergoing regular computed tomography (CT) or positron emission tomography (PET)/CT surveillance imaging at different intervals. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A closely followed longitudinal cohort of patients with resected stage IIIA–D disease treated at a tertiary referral center underwent 3- to 4-monthly, 6-monthly, or 12-monthly surveillance imaging between 2000 and 2017. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and log-rank tests assessed the significance of survival differences between imaging frequency groups. RESULTS: Of 473 patients (IIIA, 19%; IIIB, 31%; IIIC, 49%; IIID, 1%) 30% underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging, 10% underwent 6-monthly imaging, and 60% underwent 12-monthly imaging. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, distant recurrence was recorded in 252 patients (53%), with 40% detected by surveillance CT or PET/CT, 43% detected clinically, and 17% with another imaging modality. Median DDFS was 5.1 years (95% confidence interval 3.9–6.6). Among 139 IIIC patients who developed distant disease, the median dMSS was 4.4 months shorter in those who underwent 3- to 4-monthly imaging than those who underwent 12-monthly imaging. CONCLUSION: Selecting patients at higher risk of distant recurrence for more frequent surveillance imaging yields a higher proportion of imaging-detected distant recurrences but is not associated with improved survival. A randomized comparison of low versus high frequency imaging is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-02-10 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8990943/ /pubmed/35142966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Melanoma Dieng, Mbathio Lord, Sarah J. Turner, Robin M. Nieweg, Omgo E. Menzies, Alexander M. Saw, Robyn P. M. Einstein, Andrew J. Emmett, Louise Thompson, John F. Lo, Serigne N. Morton, Rachael L. The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title | The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title_full | The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title_fullStr | The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title_short | The Impact of Surveillance Imaging Frequency on the Detection of Distant Disease for Patients with Resected Stage III Melanoma |
title_sort | impact of surveillance imaging frequency on the detection of distant disease for patients with resected stage iii melanoma |
topic | Melanoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8990943/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35142966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-021-11231-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT diengmbathio theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT lordsarahj theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT turnerrobinm theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT niewegomgoe theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT menziesalexanderm theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT sawrobynpm theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT einsteinandrewj theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT emmettlouise theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT thompsonjohnf theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT loserignen theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT mortonrachaell theimpactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT diengmbathio impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT lordsarahj impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT turnerrobinm impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT niewegomgoe impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT menziesalexanderm impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT sawrobynpm impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT einsteinandrewj impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT emmettlouise impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT thompsonjohnf impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT loserignen impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma AT mortonrachaell impactofsurveillanceimagingfrequencyonthedetectionofdistantdiseaseforpatientswithresectedstageiiimelanoma |