Cargando…

Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopic imaging remains the standard intraoperative imaging modality for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures, and correlation with postoperative radiographs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the Soong classification system b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Juston, Jenkins, Ryne, Caputo, Roy J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.002
_version_ 1784683567542960128
author Fan, Juston
Jenkins, Ryne
Caputo, Roy J.
author_facet Fan, Juston
Jenkins, Ryne
Caputo, Roy J.
author_sort Fan, Juston
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Fluoroscopic imaging remains the standard intraoperative imaging modality for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures, and correlation with postoperative radiographs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the Soong classification system between intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs for distal radius volar plate position. METHODS: Eleven hand surgery resident physicians (3 in postgraduate year 2, 2 in postgraduate year 3, 3 in postgraduate year 4, and 3 in postgraduate year 5) and 4 attending physicians classified images using the Soong classification system. Fluoroscopic and radiographic lateral images from 30 patients were randomized and deidentified. Thirty percent of the images were duplicated for intraobserver reliability. Seventy-eight images were randomized and presented to each observer in 1 consecutive session. Cohen kappa values were calculated for intraobserver reliability, and Fleiss kappa values were calculated for interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability demonstrated moderate reliability overall. The intraobserver reliability was highest among postgraduate year 4 residents and attending physicians demonstrating substantial reliability. Lateral intraoperative fluoroscopic and postoperative radiographic imaging demonstrated no difference in intraobserver reliability overall. Interobserver reliability was highest among postgraduate year 5 residents demonstrating moderate reliability and attending physicians demonstrating substantial reliability. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the intraobserver reliability of the Soong classification system between the lateral images of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs. Fluoroscopic analysis using the Soong classification system is a reliable method to determine plate prominence and has demonstrated increasing reliability based on year of training. Fluoroscopic analysis using the Soong classification system and direct visualization during surgery for the assessment of plate prominence is recommended, with the understanding that higher Soong grades are associated with increased rates of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89914252022-04-11 Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification Fan, Juston Jenkins, Ryne Caputo, Roy J. J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: Fluoroscopic imaging remains the standard intraoperative imaging modality for volar locking plate fixation of distal radius fractures, and correlation with postoperative radiographs remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of the Soong classification system between intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs for distal radius volar plate position. METHODS: Eleven hand surgery resident physicians (3 in postgraduate year 2, 2 in postgraduate year 3, 3 in postgraduate year 4, and 3 in postgraduate year 5) and 4 attending physicians classified images using the Soong classification system. Fluoroscopic and radiographic lateral images from 30 patients were randomized and deidentified. Thirty percent of the images were duplicated for intraobserver reliability. Seventy-eight images were randomized and presented to each observer in 1 consecutive session. Cohen kappa values were calculated for intraobserver reliability, and Fleiss kappa values were calculated for interobserver reliability. RESULTS: Intraobserver reliability demonstrated moderate reliability overall. The intraobserver reliability was highest among postgraduate year 4 residents and attending physicians demonstrating substantial reliability. Lateral intraoperative fluoroscopic and postoperative radiographic imaging demonstrated no difference in intraobserver reliability overall. Interobserver reliability was highest among postgraduate year 5 residents demonstrating moderate reliability and attending physicians demonstrating substantial reliability. CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in the intraobserver reliability of the Soong classification system between the lateral images of intraoperative fluoroscopy and postoperative radiographs. Fluoroscopic analysis using the Soong classification system is a reliable method to determine plate prominence and has demonstrated increasing reliability based on year of training. Fluoroscopic analysis using the Soong classification system and direct visualization during surgery for the assessment of plate prominence is recommended, with the understanding that higher Soong grades are associated with increased rates of complications. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic III. Elsevier 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8991425/ /pubmed/35415591 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.002 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Fan, Juston
Jenkins, Ryne
Caputo, Roy J.
Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title_full Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title_fullStr Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title_full_unstemmed Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title_short Intraoperative Fluoroscopy Versus Postoperative Radiographs in Assessing Distal Radius Volar Plate Position: Reliability of the Soong Classification
title_sort intraoperative fluoroscopy versus postoperative radiographs in assessing distal radius volar plate position: reliability of the soong classification
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415591
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.002
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjuston intraoperativefluoroscopyversuspostoperativeradiographsinassessingdistalradiusvolarplatepositionreliabilityofthesoongclassification
AT jenkinsryne intraoperativefluoroscopyversuspostoperativeradiographsinassessingdistalradiusvolarplatepositionreliabilityofthesoongclassification
AT caputoroyj intraoperativefluoroscopyversuspostoperativeradiographsinassessingdistalradiusvolarplatepositionreliabilityofthesoongclassification