Cargando…

Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture

PURPOSE: There is a paucity of literature examining the trajectory of meaningful clinical improvement after distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) When do patients meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the Quick–Disabilities in Ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ingall, Eitan M., Bernstein, David N., Shoji, Monica M., Merchan, Nelson, Harper, Carl M., Rozental, Tamara D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.001
_version_ 1784683588107632640
author Ingall, Eitan M.
Bernstein, David N.
Shoji, Monica M.
Merchan, Nelson
Harper, Carl M.
Rozental, Tamara D.
author_facet Ingall, Eitan M.
Bernstein, David N.
Shoji, Monica M.
Merchan, Nelson
Harper, Carl M.
Rozental, Tamara D.
author_sort Ingall, Eitan M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: There is a paucity of literature examining the trajectory of meaningful clinical improvement after distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) When do patients meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the Quick–Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score change after DRF fixation? (2) What gains in terms of number of MCIDs achieved (as measured by QuickDASH) do patients make as they recover from DRF fixation? (3) What patient and injury factors are characteristic of patients who meet or do not meet the average recovery trajectory? METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database of DRF patients treated with operative fixation. The change in QuickDASH scores from before surgery to approximate follow-up intervals of 0 to 2 months, 3 to 6 months, and a minimum of 9 of 12 months was assessed, in which a delta of 14 reflected the MCID. The change in QuickDASH score from before surgery to each follow-up interval was divided by 14 to determine the number of MCIDs, representing appreciable clinical improvement. Patient characteristics were compared between those who did and did not reach average levels of clinical improvement. RESULTS: The study included 173 patients. Mean QuickDASH score before surgery was 74 (SD, 19; range, 0–100). After surgery, this improved to 50 (SD, 24; range, 0–100) by 0 to 2 months, 22 (SD, 22; range, 0–98) by 3 to 6 months, and 9.8 (SD, 15; range, 0–75) by a minimum of 9 to 12 months. Overall, 96% of patients reached the MCID by 1 year. Mean cumulative number of MCIDs achieved (ie, number of 14-point decreases in QuickDASH score) at each interval was 1.57, 3.64, and 4.43, respectively. Assuming 4.43 represents maximum average improvement at 1 year, patients achieved 35% (1.57 of 4.43) of recovery from 0 to 2 months after surgery and 82% (3.64 of 4.43) of recovery by 3 to 6 months after surgery. There appeared to be no difference in terms of age, sex, or body mass index with respect to these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 96% of patients undergoing DRF fixation will achieve one QuickDASH MCID by 1 year after surgery. Patients achieved over 80% of total expected functional improvement by 3 to 6 months after surgery, which appeared to be irrespective of age, sex, or body mass index. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991532
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89915322022-04-11 Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture Ingall, Eitan M. Bernstein, David N. Shoji, Monica M. Merchan, Nelson Harper, Carl M. Rozental, Tamara D. J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: There is a paucity of literature examining the trajectory of meaningful clinical improvement after distal radius fracture (DRF) fixation. We sought to answer the following questions: (1) When do patients meet the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the Quick–Disabilities in Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) score change after DRF fixation? (2) What gains in terms of number of MCIDs achieved (as measured by QuickDASH) do patients make as they recover from DRF fixation? (3) What patient and injury factors are characteristic of patients who meet or do not meet the average recovery trajectory? METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of an institutional database of DRF patients treated with operative fixation. The change in QuickDASH scores from before surgery to approximate follow-up intervals of 0 to 2 months, 3 to 6 months, and a minimum of 9 of 12 months was assessed, in which a delta of 14 reflected the MCID. The change in QuickDASH score from before surgery to each follow-up interval was divided by 14 to determine the number of MCIDs, representing appreciable clinical improvement. Patient characteristics were compared between those who did and did not reach average levels of clinical improvement. RESULTS: The study included 173 patients. Mean QuickDASH score before surgery was 74 (SD, 19; range, 0–100). After surgery, this improved to 50 (SD, 24; range, 0–100) by 0 to 2 months, 22 (SD, 22; range, 0–98) by 3 to 6 months, and 9.8 (SD, 15; range, 0–75) by a minimum of 9 to 12 months. Overall, 96% of patients reached the MCID by 1 year. Mean cumulative number of MCIDs achieved (ie, number of 14-point decreases in QuickDASH score) at each interval was 1.57, 3.64, and 4.43, respectively. Assuming 4.43 represents maximum average improvement at 1 year, patients achieved 35% (1.57 of 4.43) of recovery from 0 to 2 months after surgery and 82% (3.64 of 4.43) of recovery by 3 to 6 months after surgery. There appeared to be no difference in terms of age, sex, or body mass index with respect to these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 96% of patients undergoing DRF fixation will achieve one QuickDASH MCID by 1 year after surgery. Patients achieved over 80% of total expected functional improvement by 3 to 6 months after surgery, which appeared to be irrespective of age, sex, or body mass index. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV. Elsevier 2020-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8991532/ /pubmed/35415533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.001 Text en © 2020 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Ingall, Eitan M.
Bernstein, David N.
Shoji, Monica M.
Merchan, Nelson
Harper, Carl M.
Rozental, Tamara D.
Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title_full Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title_fullStr Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title_full_unstemmed Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title_short Using the QuickDASH to Model Clinical Recovery Trajectory After Operative Management of Distal Radius Fracture
title_sort using the quickdash to model clinical recovery trajectory after operative management of distal radius fracture
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991532/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2020.10.001
work_keys_str_mv AT ingalleitanm usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture
AT bernsteindavidn usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture
AT shojimonicam usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture
AT merchannelson usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture
AT harpercarlm usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture
AT rozentaltamarad usingthequickdashtomodelclinicalrecoverytrajectoryafteroperativemanagementofdistalradiusfracture