Cargando…

Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients

PURPOSE: Adhesion problems are common after plate fixation of finger phalanges and often lead to stiffness and reoperations with plate removal and tenolysis. The aim of this prospective case series was to study the effect of the adhesion barrier gel Dynavisc on total active motion (TAM), postoperati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: von Kieseritzky, Johanna, Rosengren, Jenny, Arner, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.003
_version_ 1784683607776821248
author von Kieseritzky, Johanna
Rosengren, Jenny
Arner, Marianne
author_facet von Kieseritzky, Johanna
Rosengren, Jenny
Arner, Marianne
author_sort von Kieseritzky, Johanna
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Adhesion problems are common after plate fixation of finger phalanges and often lead to stiffness and reoperations with plate removal and tenolysis. The aim of this prospective case series was to study the effect of the adhesion barrier gel Dynavisc on total active motion (TAM), postoperative pain, and grip strength after plate fixation of phalangeal fractures. Total active motion at 3 months after surgery was the primary outcome. METHODS: Eight patients with a fracture of the proximal phalanx underwent surgery with open reduction and plate fixation. The adhesion barrier Dynavisc was applied between plate and extensor tendon and between tendon and skin. Results in terms of pain, grip strength, and TAM at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery were collected. Results on TAM were classified according to Page and Stern. RESULTS: After 3 months, only 2 patients had a result classified as excellent. After 1 year, 3 patients fulfilled the criteria for an excellent result. There were no adverse events. Patients with long-standing postoperative pain had a worse outcome on TAM. CONCLUSIONS: The antiadhesive effect of Dynavisc in this prospective case series was unconvincing. Only 2 patients had an excellent result on TAM at 3 months. Because the gel is resorbed within 30 days after application, it is questionable whether the gel had a role in improvement that occurred later in the postoperative course. Larger, randomized studies would be required to show any anti-adherent effect of Dynavisc definitively in finger fracture surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991622
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89916222022-04-11 Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients von Kieseritzky, Johanna Rosengren, Jenny Arner, Marianne J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: Adhesion problems are common after plate fixation of finger phalanges and often lead to stiffness and reoperations with plate removal and tenolysis. The aim of this prospective case series was to study the effect of the adhesion barrier gel Dynavisc on total active motion (TAM), postoperative pain, and grip strength after plate fixation of phalangeal fractures. Total active motion at 3 months after surgery was the primary outcome. METHODS: Eight patients with a fracture of the proximal phalanx underwent surgery with open reduction and plate fixation. The adhesion barrier Dynavisc was applied between plate and extensor tendon and between tendon and skin. Results in terms of pain, grip strength, and TAM at 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery were collected. Results on TAM were classified according to Page and Stern. RESULTS: After 3 months, only 2 patients had a result classified as excellent. After 1 year, 3 patients fulfilled the criteria for an excellent result. There were no adverse events. Patients with long-standing postoperative pain had a worse outcome on TAM. CONCLUSIONS: The antiadhesive effect of Dynavisc in this prospective case series was unconvincing. Only 2 patients had an excellent result on TAM at 3 months. Because the gel is resorbed within 30 days after application, it is questionable whether the gel had a role in improvement that occurred later in the postoperative course. Larger, randomized studies would be required to show any anti-adherent effect of Dynavisc definitively in finger fracture surgery. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV. Elsevier 2020-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8991622/ /pubmed/35415481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.003 Text en © 2019 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
von Kieseritzky, Johanna
Rosengren, Jenny
Arner, Marianne
Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title_full Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title_fullStr Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title_full_unstemmed Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title_short Dynavisc as an Adhesion Barrier in Finger Phalangeal Plate Fixation—a Prospective Case Series of 8 Patients
title_sort dynavisc as an adhesion barrier in finger phalangeal plate fixation—a prospective case series of 8 patients
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991622/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2019.11.003
work_keys_str_mv AT vonkieseritzkyjohanna dynaviscasanadhesionbarrierinfingerphalangealplatefixationaprospectivecaseseriesof8patients
AT rosengrenjenny dynaviscasanadhesionbarrierinfingerphalangealplatefixationaprospectivecaseseriesof8patients
AT arnermarianne dynaviscasanadhesionbarrierinfingerphalangealplatefixationaprospectivecaseseriesof8patients