Cargando…

Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale

BACKGROUND: Communication-based activities and products (i.e., training programs, webinars) are a critical component of implementation strategies that relay information to various audiences. Audience perceptions of communication effectiveness contribute important insight into the processes and mecha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Xiaoquan, Toronjo, Heather, Shaw, Cameron C., Murphy, Amy, Taxman, Faye S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4
_version_ 1784683618264678400
author Zhao, Xiaoquan
Toronjo, Heather
Shaw, Cameron C.
Murphy, Amy
Taxman, Faye S.
author_facet Zhao, Xiaoquan
Toronjo, Heather
Shaw, Cameron C.
Murphy, Amy
Taxman, Faye S.
author_sort Zhao, Xiaoquan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Communication-based activities and products (i.e., training programs, webinars) are a critical component of implementation strategies that relay information to various audiences. Audience perceptions of communication effectiveness contribute important insight into the processes and mechanisms through which an implementation effort may succeed or fail. To advance research on this front, a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring perceived communication effectiveness (PCE) is needed. METHODS: An expert panel identified the theoretical foundations and conceptual domains of PCE and drafted preliminary items. Five focus groups of correctional professionals who had recently completed an implementation leadership training reviewed the items and provided feedback for refinement. Revised items were then included in a survey-based evaluation of an ongoing eLearning curriculum designed to improve the practices used by front-line probation officers in supervising individuals in the field. The factorial structure of a final 6-item scale as well as its convergent, divergent, and predictive validity was evaluated using data from the evaluation surveys (N(follow-up) = 358, N(baseline+follow-up) = 159). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of the final scale of PCE demonstrated adequate fit. PCE was strongly correlated with measures of implementation outcomes (acceptability, r = .819, p < .001; appropriateness, r = .809, p < .001; and feasibility, r = .754, p < .001), yet uncorrelated with a scale of need to evaluate (r = − .051, p = .422), demonstrating both convergent and divergent validities. The predictive validity of PCE was evidenced by significant associations between PCE and key training outcomes, including perceived staff use of evidence-based practices (β = .230, p < .05), agency climate (β = .261, p < .05), and value concordance (β = .209, p < .05), after controlling for baseline values and other confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The PCE scale is psychometrically sound and can be a useful tool for gauging audience receptivity to and the potential impact of communication-based implementation activities and products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991666
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89916662022-04-10 Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale Zhao, Xiaoquan Toronjo, Heather Shaw, Cameron C. Murphy, Amy Taxman, Faye S. Implement Sci Commun Methodology BACKGROUND: Communication-based activities and products (i.e., training programs, webinars) are a critical component of implementation strategies that relay information to various audiences. Audience perceptions of communication effectiveness contribute important insight into the processes and mechanisms through which an implementation effort may succeed or fail. To advance research on this front, a psychometrically sound instrument for measuring perceived communication effectiveness (PCE) is needed. METHODS: An expert panel identified the theoretical foundations and conceptual domains of PCE and drafted preliminary items. Five focus groups of correctional professionals who had recently completed an implementation leadership training reviewed the items and provided feedback for refinement. Revised items were then included in a survey-based evaluation of an ongoing eLearning curriculum designed to improve the practices used by front-line probation officers in supervising individuals in the field. The factorial structure of a final 6-item scale as well as its convergent, divergent, and predictive validity was evaluated using data from the evaluation surveys (N(follow-up) = 358, N(baseline+follow-up) = 159). RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis of the final scale of PCE demonstrated adequate fit. PCE was strongly correlated with measures of implementation outcomes (acceptability, r = .819, p < .001; appropriateness, r = .809, p < .001; and feasibility, r = .754, p < .001), yet uncorrelated with a scale of need to evaluate (r = − .051, p = .422), demonstrating both convergent and divergent validities. The predictive validity of PCE was evidenced by significant associations between PCE and key training outcomes, including perceived staff use of evidence-based practices (β = .230, p < .05), agency climate (β = .261, p < .05), and value concordance (β = .209, p < .05), after controlling for baseline values and other confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The PCE scale is psychometrically sound and can be a useful tool for gauging audience receptivity to and the potential impact of communication-based implementation activities and products. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4. BioMed Central 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8991666/ /pubmed/35395790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Methodology
Zhao, Xiaoquan
Toronjo, Heather
Shaw, Cameron C.
Murphy, Amy
Taxman, Faye S.
Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title_full Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title_fullStr Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title_full_unstemmed Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title_short Perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
title_sort perceived communication effectiveness in implementation strategies: a measurement scale
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991666/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395790
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-022-00284-4
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoxiaoquan perceivedcommunicationeffectivenessinimplementationstrategiesameasurementscale
AT toronjoheather perceivedcommunicationeffectivenessinimplementationstrategiesameasurementscale
AT shawcameronc perceivedcommunicationeffectivenessinimplementationstrategiesameasurementscale
AT murphyamy perceivedcommunicationeffectivenessinimplementationstrategiesameasurementscale
AT taxmanfayes perceivedcommunicationeffectivenessinimplementationstrategiesameasurementscale