Cargando…

Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities

BACKGROUND: Risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can be assessed based on drop vertical jump (DVJ). However, biomechanics of DVJ may differ with various sporting activities. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether biomechanical features of DVJ are different am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harato, Kengo, Morishige, Yutaro, Kobayashi, Shu, Niki, Yasuo, Nagura, Takeo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05290-0
_version_ 1784683621020336128
author Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
author_facet Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
author_sort Harato, Kengo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can be assessed based on drop vertical jump (DVJ). However, biomechanics of DVJ may differ with various sporting activities. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether biomechanical features of DVJ are different among various sporting activities in female athletes. METHODS: A total of 42 female athletes, including 25 basketball, 8 soccer and 9 volleyball players, participated in the current investigation. DVJ was done for each female athlete using a three-dimensional motion analysis system which consisted of six cameras, two force plates and 46 retro-reflective markers. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded for both limbs in each athlete. Simultaneously, frontal and sagittal plane views of the DVJ were recorded using two different high-resolution video cameras to evaluate Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) score. Three-dimensional biomechanical parameters at the knee joint and LESS were compared among three different sporting activities using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test after confirming normality assumption. Thereafter post hoc Tukey or Steel–Dwass was utilized for multiple comparison. RESULTS: Soccer players had better LESS score, and peak knee flexion angle was significantly larger in soccer players compared to the other sports. In addition, knee abduction angle at initial contact (IC), peak knee abduction angle, knee internal rotation angle, and knee abduction moment within 40 ms from IC were significantly smaller in soccer players, compared to basketball players. In terms of volleyball players, knee abduction angle at IC and knee internal rotation angle at IC were significantly larger than soccer players, whereas no significant biomechanical differences were found between basketball and volleyball players. CONCLUSIONS: From the present study, female basketball and volleyball players have worse LESS score, smaller peak knee flexion angle, greater knee abduction angle at IC and greater knee internal rotation angle at IC, compared to female soccer players. Thus, female basketball and volleyball players may have an increased risk of non-contact ACL injury during the jump-landing task, compared to soccer players. Biomechanics of DVJ depends on characteristics of the athlete's primary sport.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991679
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89916792022-04-09 Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities Harato, Kengo Morishige, Yutaro Kobayashi, Shu Niki, Yasuo Nagura, Takeo BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research BACKGROUND: Risk for non-contact anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury can be assessed based on drop vertical jump (DVJ). However, biomechanics of DVJ may differ with various sporting activities. The purpose of the present study was to clarify whether biomechanical features of DVJ are different among various sporting activities in female athletes. METHODS: A total of 42 female athletes, including 25 basketball, 8 soccer and 9 volleyball players, participated in the current investigation. DVJ was done for each female athlete using a three-dimensional motion analysis system which consisted of six cameras, two force plates and 46 retro-reflective markers. Kinematic and kinetic data were recorded for both limbs in each athlete. Simultaneously, frontal and sagittal plane views of the DVJ were recorded using two different high-resolution video cameras to evaluate Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) score. Three-dimensional biomechanical parameters at the knee joint and LESS were compared among three different sporting activities using ANOVA or Kruskal–Wallis test after confirming normality assumption. Thereafter post hoc Tukey or Steel–Dwass was utilized for multiple comparison. RESULTS: Soccer players had better LESS score, and peak knee flexion angle was significantly larger in soccer players compared to the other sports. In addition, knee abduction angle at initial contact (IC), peak knee abduction angle, knee internal rotation angle, and knee abduction moment within 40 ms from IC were significantly smaller in soccer players, compared to basketball players. In terms of volleyball players, knee abduction angle at IC and knee internal rotation angle at IC were significantly larger than soccer players, whereas no significant biomechanical differences were found between basketball and volleyball players. CONCLUSIONS: From the present study, female basketball and volleyball players have worse LESS score, smaller peak knee flexion angle, greater knee abduction angle at IC and greater knee internal rotation angle at IC, compared to female soccer players. Thus, female basketball and volleyball players may have an increased risk of non-contact ACL injury during the jump-landing task, compared to soccer players. Biomechanics of DVJ depends on characteristics of the athlete's primary sport. BioMed Central 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8991679/ /pubmed/35395841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05290-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Harato, Kengo
Morishige, Yutaro
Kobayashi, Shu
Niki, Yasuo
Nagura, Takeo
Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title_full Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title_fullStr Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title_short Biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
title_sort biomechanical features of drop vertical jump are different among various sporting activities
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991679/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05290-0
work_keys_str_mv AT haratokengo biomechanicalfeaturesofdropverticaljumparedifferentamongvarioussportingactivities
AT morishigeyutaro biomechanicalfeaturesofdropverticaljumparedifferentamongvarioussportingactivities
AT kobayashishu biomechanicalfeaturesofdropverticaljumparedifferentamongvarioussportingactivities
AT nikiyasuo biomechanicalfeaturesofdropverticaljumparedifferentamongvarioussportingactivities
AT naguratakeo biomechanicalfeaturesofdropverticaljumparedifferentamongvarioussportingactivities