Cargando…

Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment

BACKGROUND: The stillbirth rate in Tanzania remains high. Greater engagement with antenatal care may help to reduce stillbirths. We investigated which characteristics of antenatal care clinics are preferred by pregnant women in Tanzania. METHODS: We conducted an unlabelled discrete choice experiment...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Camacho, Elizabeth M., Smyth, Rebecca, Danna, Valentina Actis, Kimaro, Deborah, Kuzenza, Flora, Laisser, Rose, Mdoe, Paschal, Nsemwa, Livuka, Shayo, Happiness, Lavender, Tina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x
_version_ 1784683621499535360
author Camacho, Elizabeth M.
Smyth, Rebecca
Danna, Valentina Actis
Kimaro, Deborah
Kuzenza, Flora
Laisser, Rose
Mdoe, Paschal
Nsemwa, Livuka
Shayo, Happiness
Lavender, Tina
author_facet Camacho, Elizabeth M.
Smyth, Rebecca
Danna, Valentina Actis
Kimaro, Deborah
Kuzenza, Flora
Laisser, Rose
Mdoe, Paschal
Nsemwa, Livuka
Shayo, Happiness
Lavender, Tina
author_sort Camacho, Elizabeth M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The stillbirth rate in Tanzania remains high. Greater engagement with antenatal care may help to reduce stillbirths. We investigated which characteristics of antenatal care clinics are preferred by pregnant women in Tanzania. METHODS: We conducted an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE) with think-aloud interviews. Participants were pregnant women, regardless of parity/gestation, from the Mwanza and Manyara regions of Tanzania. We asked participants to choose which of two hypothetical antenatal clinics they would rather attend. Clinics were described in terms of transport mode, cleanliness, comfort, visit content, and staff attitude. Each participant made 12 choices during the experiment, and a purposively selected sub-set simultaneously verbalised the rationale for their choices. We analysed DCE responses using a multinomial logit model adjusted for study region, and think-aloud data using the Framework approach. RESULTS: We recruited 251 participants split evenly between the 2 geographical regions. Staff attitude was the most important attribute in clinic choice and dominated the think-aloud narratives. Other significant attributes were mode of transport (walking was preferred) and content of clinic visit (preference was stronger with each additional element of care provided). Cleanliness of the clinic was not a significant attribute overall and the think-aloud exercise identified a willingness to trade-off cleanliness and comfort for respectful care. CONCLUSION: Women would prefer to attend a clinic with kind staff which they can access easily. This study suggests that exploration of barriers to providing respectful care, and enabling staff to deliver it, are important areas for future investment. The DCE shows us what average preferences are; antenatal care that is aligned with identified preferences should increase uptake and engagement versus care which does not acknowledge them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89916812022-04-09 Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment Camacho, Elizabeth M. Smyth, Rebecca Danna, Valentina Actis Kimaro, Deborah Kuzenza, Flora Laisser, Rose Mdoe, Paschal Nsemwa, Livuka Shayo, Happiness Lavender, Tina BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: The stillbirth rate in Tanzania remains high. Greater engagement with antenatal care may help to reduce stillbirths. We investigated which characteristics of antenatal care clinics are preferred by pregnant women in Tanzania. METHODS: We conducted an unlabelled discrete choice experiment (DCE) with think-aloud interviews. Participants were pregnant women, regardless of parity/gestation, from the Mwanza and Manyara regions of Tanzania. We asked participants to choose which of two hypothetical antenatal clinics they would rather attend. Clinics were described in terms of transport mode, cleanliness, comfort, visit content, and staff attitude. Each participant made 12 choices during the experiment, and a purposively selected sub-set simultaneously verbalised the rationale for their choices. We analysed DCE responses using a multinomial logit model adjusted for study region, and think-aloud data using the Framework approach. RESULTS: We recruited 251 participants split evenly between the 2 geographical regions. Staff attitude was the most important attribute in clinic choice and dominated the think-aloud narratives. Other significant attributes were mode of transport (walking was preferred) and content of clinic visit (preference was stronger with each additional element of care provided). Cleanliness of the clinic was not a significant attribute overall and the think-aloud exercise identified a willingness to trade-off cleanliness and comfort for respectful care. CONCLUSION: Women would prefer to attend a clinic with kind staff which they can access easily. This study suggests that exploration of barriers to providing respectful care, and enabling staff to deliver it, are important areas for future investment. The DCE shows us what average preferences are; antenatal care that is aligned with identified preferences should increase uptake and engagement versus care which does not acknowledge them. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8991681/ /pubmed/35392853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Camacho, Elizabeth M.
Smyth, Rebecca
Danna, Valentina Actis
Kimaro, Deborah
Kuzenza, Flora
Laisser, Rose
Mdoe, Paschal
Nsemwa, Livuka
Shayo, Happiness
Lavender, Tina
Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title_full Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title_fullStr Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title_full_unstemmed Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title_short Women’s preferences for antenatal care in Tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
title_sort women’s preferences for antenatal care in tanzania: a discrete choice experiment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04634-x
work_keys_str_mv AT camachoelizabethm womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT smythrebecca womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT dannavalentinaactis womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT kimarodeborah womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT kuzenzaflora womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT laisserrose womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT mdoepaschal womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT nsemwalivuka womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT shayohappiness womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment
AT lavendertina womenspreferencesforantenatalcareintanzaniaadiscretechoiceexperiment