Cargando…
A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6 |
_version_ | 1784683624715517952 |
---|---|
author | Ospanov, Oral Yeleuov, Galymzhan Fursov, Alexandr Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar Fursov, Roman Sergazin, Zhenis Mustafin, Adil |
author_facet | Ospanov, Oral Yeleuov, Galymzhan Fursov, Alexandr Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar Fursov, Roman Sergazin, Zhenis Mustafin, Adil |
author_sort | Ospanov, Oral |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively). DISCUSSION: With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04834635. Registered on 8 April 2021. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8991694 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89916942022-04-09 A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Ospanov, Oral Yeleuov, Galymzhan Fursov, Alexandr Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar Fursov, Roman Sergazin, Zhenis Mustafin, Adil Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively). DISCUSSION: With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04834635. Registered on 8 April 2021. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8991694/ /pubmed/35392958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Ospanov, Oral Yeleuov, Galymzhan Fursov, Alexandr Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar Fursov, Roman Sergazin, Zhenis Mustafin, Adil A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title | A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (fundoringoagb trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991694/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ospanovoral alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yeleuovgalymzhan alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fursovalexandr alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yelembayevbakhtiyar alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fursovroman alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sergazinzhenis alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mustafinadil alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ospanovoral laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yeleuovgalymzhan laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fursovalexandr laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yelembayevbakhtiyar laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fursovroman laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT sergazinzhenis laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mustafinadil laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial |