Cargando…

A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ospanov, Oral, Yeleuov, Galymzhan, Fursov, Alexandr, Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar, Fursov, Roman, Sergazin, Zhenis, Mustafin, Adil
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6
_version_ 1784683624715517952
author Ospanov, Oral
Yeleuov, Galymzhan
Fursov, Alexandr
Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar
Fursov, Roman
Sergazin, Zhenis
Mustafin, Adil
author_facet Ospanov, Oral
Yeleuov, Galymzhan
Fursov, Alexandr
Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar
Fursov, Roman
Sergazin, Zhenis
Mustafin, Adil
author_sort Ospanov, Oral
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively). DISCUSSION: With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04834635. Registered on 8 April 2021.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991694
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89916942022-04-09 A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial Ospanov, Oral Yeleuov, Galymzhan Fursov, Alexandr Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar Fursov, Roman Sergazin, Zhenis Mustafin, Adil Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) is a simple variation of gastric bypass and has gained worldwide popularity with clinical outcomes similar to laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) for weight loss and management of comorbidities. However, biliary reflux to the esophagus negates the benefits of LOAGB. In addition, weight gain after LOAGB and after LRYGB is a major problem in bariatric surgery. The aim of this article is to describe the design and protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing the outcomes of two methods of LOAGB: experimental method with wrapping versus standard method nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. METHODS: The study was designed as a single-center prospective, interventional, randomized controlled trial. Masking: None (open label). Allocation: randomized. Enrollment: 100 obese patients. The relevant ethics committee approved the trial protocol. The endpoints (body mass index, bile reflux in the esophagus, other reflux symptoms) will be assessed presurgery and postsurgery (12, 24, and 36 months postoperatively). DISCUSSION: With its 3-year follow-up time, this RCT will provide important data on the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to prevent weight regain and biliary reflux after LOAGB. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.govNCT04834635. Registered on 8 April 2021. BioMed Central 2022-04-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8991694/ /pubmed/35392958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ospanov, Oral
Yeleuov, Galymzhan
Fursov, Alexandr
Yelembayev, Bakhtiyar
Fursov, Roman
Sergazin, Zhenis
Mustafin, Adil
A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_short A laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (FundoRingOAGB trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
title_sort laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass with wrapping versus nonwrapping fundus of the excluded part of the stomach to treat obese patients (fundoringoagb trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991694/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35392958
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06252-6
work_keys_str_mv AT ospanovoral alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeleuovgalymzhan alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fursovalexandr alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yelembayevbakhtiyar alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fursovroman alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sergazinzhenis alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mustafinadil alaparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT ospanovoral laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yeleuovgalymzhan laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fursovalexandr laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yelembayevbakhtiyar laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT fursovroman laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT sergazinzhenis laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mustafinadil laparoscopiconeanastomosisgastricbypasswithwrappingversusnonwrappingfundusoftheexcludedpartofthestomachtotreatobesepatientsfundoringoagbtrialstudyprotocolforarandomizedcontrolledtrial