Cargando…

Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button

PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury during cortical button deployment and seating associated with bicortical drilling and passage of the cortical button across the distal cortex when repairing a distal biceps rupture in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Each c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lynch, Brian, Duke, Alex, Komatsu, David, Wang, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.003
_version_ 1784683629203423232
author Lynch, Brian
Duke, Alex
Komatsu, David
Wang, Edward
author_facet Lynch, Brian
Duke, Alex
Komatsu, David
Wang, Edward
author_sort Lynch, Brian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury during cortical button deployment and seating associated with bicortical drilling and passage of the cortical button across the distal cortex when repairing a distal biceps rupture in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Each cadaver was placed in the supine position with the arm extended. A single 4 cm transverse incision was made in the region of the radial tuberosity, 3–4 cm distal to the antecubital fossa flexion crease, and dissected down to the radial tuberosity. A #2 looped nonabsorbable suture was used to baseball stitch the musculotendinous junction to the distal 2.5 cm end of the tendon. A 3.2 mm cannulated drill bit (Arthrex) was used to create a bicortical drill hole in the center of the radial tuberosity aiming 30° ulnar to maximize the distance from the PIN. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm drill placement in the radial tuberosity for all specimens. The posterior aspect of the elbow in all cadavers was subsequently dissected out to directly visualize how far the cannulated drill was from the PIN. RESULTS: Twelve cadavers, average age 57.4 years (range, 27–83 years), were dissected. During deployment, the cortical button contacted the PIN directly in 6 extremities. The cortical button came within 6 mm of the PIN in eleven extremities. In 8 specimens, the cortical button was within 2 mm of the PIN. The PIN was caught directly under the cortical button in one specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a biceps cortical button bicortically when repairing a distal biceps tendon may increase the risk of injury to the PIN during cortical button deployment and seating. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89917172022-04-11 Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button Lynch, Brian Duke, Alex Komatsu, David Wang, Edward J Hand Surg Glob Online Original Research PURPOSE: To evaluate the possibility of posterior interosseous nerve (PIN) injury during cortical button deployment and seating associated with bicortical drilling and passage of the cortical button across the distal cortex when repairing a distal biceps rupture in a cadaveric model. METHODS: Each cadaver was placed in the supine position with the arm extended. A single 4 cm transverse incision was made in the region of the radial tuberosity, 3–4 cm distal to the antecubital fossa flexion crease, and dissected down to the radial tuberosity. A #2 looped nonabsorbable suture was used to baseball stitch the musculotendinous junction to the distal 2.5 cm end of the tendon. A 3.2 mm cannulated drill bit (Arthrex) was used to create a bicortical drill hole in the center of the radial tuberosity aiming 30° ulnar to maximize the distance from the PIN. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm drill placement in the radial tuberosity for all specimens. The posterior aspect of the elbow in all cadavers was subsequently dissected out to directly visualize how far the cannulated drill was from the PIN. RESULTS: Twelve cadavers, average age 57.4 years (range, 27–83 years), were dissected. During deployment, the cortical button contacted the PIN directly in 6 extremities. The cortical button came within 6 mm of the PIN in eleven extremities. In 8 specimens, the cortical button was within 2 mm of the PIN. The PIN was caught directly under the cortical button in one specimen. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of a biceps cortical button bicortically when repairing a distal biceps tendon may increase the risk of injury to the PIN during cortical button deployment and seating. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV. Elsevier 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8991717/ /pubmed/35415600 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.003 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research
Lynch, Brian
Duke, Alex
Komatsu, David
Wang, Edward
Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title_full Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title_fullStr Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title_full_unstemmed Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title_short Risk of Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Distal Biceps Tendon Repair Using a Cortical Button
title_sort risk of posterior interosseous nerve injury during distal biceps tendon repair using a cortical button
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35415600
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsg.2021.09.003
work_keys_str_mv AT lynchbrian riskofposteriorinterosseousnerveinjuryduringdistalbicepstendonrepairusingacorticalbutton
AT dukealex riskofposteriorinterosseousnerveinjuryduringdistalbicepstendonrepairusingacorticalbutton
AT komatsudavid riskofposteriorinterosseousnerveinjuryduringdistalbicepstendonrepairusingacorticalbutton
AT wangedward riskofposteriorinterosseousnerveinjuryduringdistalbicepstendonrepairusingacorticalbutton