Cargando…

Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are a major cause of preventable patient harm. Studies suggest that presenting inaccurate diagnostic suggestions can cause errors in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning processes. It is common practice for general practitioners (GPs) to suggest a diagnosis when referring a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Staal, J., Speelman, M., Brand, R., Alsma, J., Zwaan, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7
_version_ 1784683677975838720
author Staal, J.
Speelman, M.
Brand, R.
Alsma, J.
Zwaan, L.
author_facet Staal, J.
Speelman, M.
Brand, R.
Alsma, J.
Zwaan, L.
author_sort Staal, J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are a major cause of preventable patient harm. Studies suggest that presenting inaccurate diagnostic suggestions can cause errors in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning processes. It is common practice for general practitioners (GPs) to suggest a diagnosis when referring a patient to secondary care. However, it remains unclear via which underlying processes this practice can impact diagnostic performance. This study therefore examined the effect of a diagnostic suggestion in a GP’s referral letter to the emergency department on the diagnostic performance of medical interns. METHODS: Medical interns diagnosed six clinical cases formatted as GP referral letters in a randomized within-subjects experiment. They diagnosed two referral letters stating a main complaint without a diagnostic suggestion (control), two stating a correct suggestion, and two stating an incorrect suggestion. The referral question and case order were randomized. We analysed the effect of the referral question on interns’ diagnostic accuracy, number of differential diagnoses, confidence, and time taken to diagnose. RESULTS: Forty-four medical interns participated. Interns considered more diagnoses in their differential without a suggested diagnosis (M = 1.85, SD = 1.09) than with a suggested diagnosis, independent of whether this suggestion was correct (M = 1.52, SD = 0.96, d = 0.32) or incorrect ((M = 1.42, SD = 0.97, d = 0.41), χ2(2) =7.6, p = 0.022). The diagnostic suggestion did not influence diagnostic accuracy (χ2(2) = 1.446, p = 0.486), confidence, (χ2(2) = 0.058, p = 0.971) or time to diagnose (χ2(2) = 3.128, p = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic suggestion in a GPs referral letter did not influence subsequent diagnostic accuracy, confidence, or time to diagnose for medical interns. However, a correct or incorrect suggestion reduced the number of diagnoses considered. It is important for healthcare providers and teachers to be aware of this phenomenon, as fostering a broad differential could support learning. Future research is necessary to examine whether these findings generalize to other healthcare workers, such as more experienced specialists or triage nurses, whose decisions might affect the diagnostic process later on. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was preregistered and is available online at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/7de5g). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8991944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89919442022-04-09 Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study Staal, J. Speelman, M. Brand, R. Alsma, J. Zwaan, L. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Diagnostic errors are a major cause of preventable patient harm. Studies suggest that presenting inaccurate diagnostic suggestions can cause errors in physicians’ diagnostic reasoning processes. It is common practice for general practitioners (GPs) to suggest a diagnosis when referring a patient to secondary care. However, it remains unclear via which underlying processes this practice can impact diagnostic performance. This study therefore examined the effect of a diagnostic suggestion in a GP’s referral letter to the emergency department on the diagnostic performance of medical interns. METHODS: Medical interns diagnosed six clinical cases formatted as GP referral letters in a randomized within-subjects experiment. They diagnosed two referral letters stating a main complaint without a diagnostic suggestion (control), two stating a correct suggestion, and two stating an incorrect suggestion. The referral question and case order were randomized. We analysed the effect of the referral question on interns’ diagnostic accuracy, number of differential diagnoses, confidence, and time taken to diagnose. RESULTS: Forty-four medical interns participated. Interns considered more diagnoses in their differential without a suggested diagnosis (M = 1.85, SD = 1.09) than with a suggested diagnosis, independent of whether this suggestion was correct (M = 1.52, SD = 0.96, d = 0.32) or incorrect ((M = 1.42, SD = 0.97, d = 0.41), χ2(2) =7.6, p = 0.022). The diagnostic suggestion did not influence diagnostic accuracy (χ2(2) = 1.446, p = 0.486), confidence, (χ2(2) = 0.058, p = 0.971) or time to diagnose (χ2(2) = 3.128, p = 0.209). CONCLUSIONS: A diagnostic suggestion in a GPs referral letter did not influence subsequent diagnostic accuracy, confidence, or time to diagnose for medical interns. However, a correct or incorrect suggestion reduced the number of diagnoses considered. It is important for healthcare providers and teachers to be aware of this phenomenon, as fostering a broad differential could support learning. Future research is necessary to examine whether these findings generalize to other healthcare workers, such as more experienced specialists or triage nurses, whose decisions might affect the diagnostic process later on. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was preregistered and is available online at Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/7de5g). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7. BioMed Central 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8991944/ /pubmed/35395938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Staal, J.
Speelman, M.
Brand, R.
Alsma, J.
Zwaan, L.
Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title_full Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title_fullStr Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title_full_unstemmed Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title_short Does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
title_sort does a suggested diagnosis in a general practitioners’ referral question impact diagnostic reasoning: an experimental study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03325-7
work_keys_str_mv AT staalj doesasuggesteddiagnosisinageneralpractitionersreferralquestionimpactdiagnosticreasoninganexperimentalstudy
AT speelmanm doesasuggesteddiagnosisinageneralpractitionersreferralquestionimpactdiagnosticreasoninganexperimentalstudy
AT brandr doesasuggesteddiagnosisinageneralpractitionersreferralquestionimpactdiagnosticreasoninganexperimentalstudy
AT alsmaj doesasuggesteddiagnosisinageneralpractitionersreferralquestionimpactdiagnosticreasoninganexperimentalstudy
AT zwaanl doesasuggesteddiagnosisinageneralpractitionersreferralquestionimpactdiagnosticreasoninganexperimentalstudy