Cargando…
Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS
BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received empirical support as a viable treatment alternative for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, patients and the public-at-large may be hesitant to adopt rTMS. In three studies, we sought to (1) assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03880-9 |
_version_ | 1784683680207208448 |
---|---|
author | Morrison, Amanda S. Uusberg, Andero Ryan, Julia Goldenberg, Amit Etkin, Amit Gross, James J. |
author_facet | Morrison, Amanda S. Uusberg, Andero Ryan, Julia Goldenberg, Amit Etkin, Amit Gross, James J. |
author_sort | Morrison, Amanda S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received empirical support as a viable treatment alternative for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, patients and the public-at-large may be hesitant to adopt rTMS. In three studies, we sought to (1) assess and (2) improve public perceptions of rTMS as a treatment for depression. METHODS: In Study 1 (N = 107), we administered questionnaires on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to individuals from the US and Canada in a cross-sectional design to assess perceptions of rTMS compared to psychopharmacology, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and talk therapy. In Study 2 (N = 106), we again used an MTurk sample and a cross-sectional design to assess perceptions of rTMS after providing participants with a relatively long description of rTMS. In Study 3 (N = 308), we conducted an experiment in undergraduate students. Participants were randomized to one of four experimental conditions manipulating participants’ understanding of the causal mechanisms of depression prior to assessing their perceptions of rTMS. RESULTS: Public perceptions of rTMS were more negative than pharmacotherapy and talk therapy but not ECT (Study 1). rTMS perceptions were notably better when participants were given thorough information about rTMS procedures, pain, and side-effects (Study 2), compared to the previous study when they were given a very brief description of rTMS. Finally, perceptions of rTMS were significantly better when participants were given a brain circuitry-based causal explanation of depression compared to when they were given a psychological explanation of the causes of depression (Study 3). CONCLUSIONS: Public perceptions of rTMS are relatively poor. To improve rTMS acceptability, practitioners should carefully consider patients’ prior attitudes and beliefs when explaining rTMS as a treatment alternative. Given that beliefs can have powerful effects on treatment outcome (e.g., placebo, nocebo), future research should explore whether rTMS effects on depression can be improved by facilitating less negative perceptions of rTMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-03880-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8991954 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89919542022-04-09 Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS Morrison, Amanda S. Uusberg, Andero Ryan, Julia Goldenberg, Amit Etkin, Amit Gross, James J. BMC Psychiatry Research BACKGROUND: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received empirical support as a viable treatment alternative for treatment-resistant major depressive disorder. Nevertheless, patients and the public-at-large may be hesitant to adopt rTMS. In three studies, we sought to (1) assess and (2) improve public perceptions of rTMS as a treatment for depression. METHODS: In Study 1 (N = 107), we administered questionnaires on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk (MTurk) to individuals from the US and Canada in a cross-sectional design to assess perceptions of rTMS compared to psychopharmacology, electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and talk therapy. In Study 2 (N = 106), we again used an MTurk sample and a cross-sectional design to assess perceptions of rTMS after providing participants with a relatively long description of rTMS. In Study 3 (N = 308), we conducted an experiment in undergraduate students. Participants were randomized to one of four experimental conditions manipulating participants’ understanding of the causal mechanisms of depression prior to assessing their perceptions of rTMS. RESULTS: Public perceptions of rTMS were more negative than pharmacotherapy and talk therapy but not ECT (Study 1). rTMS perceptions were notably better when participants were given thorough information about rTMS procedures, pain, and side-effects (Study 2), compared to the previous study when they were given a very brief description of rTMS. Finally, perceptions of rTMS were significantly better when participants were given a brain circuitry-based causal explanation of depression compared to when they were given a psychological explanation of the causes of depression (Study 3). CONCLUSIONS: Public perceptions of rTMS are relatively poor. To improve rTMS acceptability, practitioners should carefully consider patients’ prior attitudes and beliefs when explaining rTMS as a treatment alternative. Given that beliefs can have powerful effects on treatment outcome (e.g., placebo, nocebo), future research should explore whether rTMS effects on depression can be improved by facilitating less negative perceptions of rTMS. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12888-022-03880-9. BioMed Central 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8991954/ /pubmed/35395758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03880-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Morrison, Amanda S. Uusberg, Andero Ryan, Julia Goldenberg, Amit Etkin, Amit Gross, James J. Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title | Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title_full | Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title_fullStr | Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title_short | Assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rTMS |
title_sort | assessing and improving public mental health literacy concerning rtms |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8991954/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35395758 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-03880-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morrisonamandas assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms AT uusbergandero assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms AT ryanjulia assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms AT goldenbergamit assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms AT etkinamit assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms AT grossjamesj assessingandimprovingpublicmentalhealthliteracyconcerningrtms |