Cargando…

Depressive symptoms in higher education students during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of containment measures

BACKGROUND: Students are a vulnerable group for the indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly their mental health. This paper examined the cross-national variation in students’ depressive symptoms and whether this can be related to the various protective measures implemented in response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buffel, Veerle, Van de Velde, Sarah, Akvardar, Yildiz, Bask, Miia, Brault, Marie-Christine, Busse, Heide, Chatzittofis, Andreas, Ladner, Joel, Rabiee-Khan, Fatemeh, Stathopoulou, Theoni, Tavolacci, Marie-Pierre, van der Heijde, Claudia, Pischke, Claudia R, Matos Fialho, Paula Mayara, Wouters, Edwin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35289850
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckac026
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Students are a vulnerable group for the indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly their mental health. This paper examined the cross-national variation in students’ depressive symptoms and whether this can be related to the various protective measures implemented in response to the initial stage of the COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: Student data stem from the COVID-19 International Student Well-being Study, covering 26 countries during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Country-level data on government responses to the COVID-19 pandemic were retrieved from the Oxford COVID-19 Tracker. Multilevel analyses were performed to estimate the impact of the containment and economic support measures on students’ depressive symptoms (n = 78 312). RESULTS: School and workplace closures, and stay-at-home restrictions were positively related to students’ depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic, while none of the economic support measures significantly related to depressive symptoms. Countries’ scores on the index of these containment measures explained 1.5% of the cross-national variation in students’ depressive symptoms (5.3%). This containment index’s effect was stable, even when controlling for the economic support index, students’ characteristics, and countries’ epidemiological context and economic conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings raise concerns about the potential adverse effects of existing containment measures (especially the closure of schools and workplaces and stay-at-home restrictions) on students’ mental health.