Cargando…

Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Yeo Jin, Choi, In Young, Yeom, Suk Keu, Cha, Sang Hoon, Jung, Yunsub, Han, Hyun Jong, Shim, Euddeum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480337
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. RESULTS: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose.