Cargando…

Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction

PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) wer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Yeo Jin, Choi, In Young, Yeom, Suk Keu, Cha, Sang Hoon, Jung, Yunsub, Han, Hyun Jong, Shim, Euddeum
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480337
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638
_version_ 1784683795722534912
author Yoo, Yeo Jin
Choi, In Young
Yeom, Suk Keu
Cha, Sang Hoon
Jung, Yunsub
Han, Hyun Jong
Shim, Euddeum
author_facet Yoo, Yeo Jin
Choi, In Young
Yeom, Suk Keu
Cha, Sang Hoon
Jung, Yunsub
Han, Hyun Jong
Shim, Euddeum
author_sort Yoo, Yeo Jin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. RESULTS: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89927652022-04-26 Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Yoo, Yeo Jin Choi, In Young Yeom, Suk Keu Cha, Sang Hoon Jung, Yunsub Han, Hyun Jong Shim, Euddeum J Belg Soc Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. RESULTS: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose. Ubiquity Press 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8992765/ /pubmed/35480337 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoo, Yeo Jin
Choi, In Young
Yeom, Suk Keu
Cha, Sang Hoon
Jung, Yunsub
Han, Hyun Jong
Shim, Euddeum
Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title_full Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title_fullStr Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title_short Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
title_sort evaluation of abdominal ct obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction engine compared with ct using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480337
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638
work_keys_str_mv AT yooyeojin evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT choiinyoung evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT yeomsukkeu evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT chasanghoon evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT jungyunsub evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT hanhyunjong evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction
AT shimeuddeum evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction