Cargando…
Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction
PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) wer...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ubiquity Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480337 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638 |
_version_ | 1784683795722534912 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Yeo Jin Choi, In Young Yeom, Suk Keu Cha, Sang Hoon Jung, Yunsub Han, Hyun Jong Shim, Euddeum |
author_facet | Yoo, Yeo Jin Choi, In Young Yeom, Suk Keu Cha, Sang Hoon Jung, Yunsub Han, Hyun Jong Shim, Euddeum |
author_sort | Yoo, Yeo Jin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. RESULTS: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8992765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Ubiquity Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-89927652022-04-26 Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Yoo, Yeo Jin Choi, In Young Yeom, Suk Keu Cha, Sang Hoon Jung, Yunsub Han, Hyun Jong Shim, Euddeum J Belg Soc Radiol Original Article PURPOSE: To compare the image quality of CT obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction (DLIR) engine with images with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (AV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using a phantom, the noise power spectrum (NPS) and task-based transfer function (TTF) were measured in images with different reconstructions (filtered back projection [FBP], AV30, 50, 100, DLIR-L, M, H) at multiple doses. One hundred and twenty abdominal CTs with 30% dose reduction were processed using AV30, AV50, DLIR-L, M, H. Objective and subjective analyses were performed. RESULTS: The NPS peak of DLIR was lower than that of AV30 or AV50. Compared with AV30, the NPS average spatial frequencies were higher with DLIR-L or DLIR-M. For lower contrast objects, TTF in images with DLIR were higher than those with AV. The standard deviation in DLIR-H and DLIR-M was significantly lower than AV30 and AV50. The overall image quality was the best for DLIR-M (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: DLIR showed improved image quality and decreased noise under a decreased radiation dose. Ubiquity Press 2022-04-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8992765/ /pubmed/35480337 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yoo, Yeo Jin Choi, In Young Yeom, Suk Keu Cha, Sang Hoon Jung, Yunsub Han, Hyun Jong Shim, Euddeum Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title | Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title_full | Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title_short | Evaluation of Abdominal CT Obtained Using a Deep Learning-Based Image Reconstruction Engine Compared with CT Using Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction |
title_sort | evaluation of abdominal ct obtained using a deep learning-based image reconstruction engine compared with ct using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480337 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/jbsr.2638 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yooyeojin evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT choiinyoung evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT yeomsukkeu evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT chasanghoon evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT jungyunsub evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT hanhyunjong evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction AT shimeuddeum evaluationofabdominalctobtainedusingadeeplearningbasedimagereconstructionenginecomparedwithctusingadaptivestatisticaliterativereconstruction |