Cargando…

Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation

INTRODUCTION: Diabetes foot ulceration (DFU) presents an enormous burden to those living with diabetes and to the local health systems and economies. There is an increasing interest in implementing integrated care models to enhance the quality of care for people living with diabetes and related comp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palladino, Raffaele, More, Ash, Greenfield, Geva, Anokye, Nana, Pigott, Elizabeth, Willis, Tony, Edward, Gregg, Majeed, Azeem, Kong, Wing May
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5956
_version_ 1784683796930494464
author Palladino, Raffaele
More, Ash
Greenfield, Geva
Anokye, Nana
Pigott, Elizabeth
Willis, Tony
Edward, Gregg
Majeed, Azeem
Kong, Wing May
author_facet Palladino, Raffaele
More, Ash
Greenfield, Geva
Anokye, Nana
Pigott, Elizabeth
Willis, Tony
Edward, Gregg
Majeed, Azeem
Kong, Wing May
author_sort Palladino, Raffaele
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Diabetes foot ulceration (DFU) presents an enormous burden to those living with diabetes and to the local health systems and economies. There is an increasing interest in implementing integrated care models to enhance the quality of care for people living with diabetes and related complications and the value of co-production approaches to achieve sustainable change. This paper aims to describe the evaluation methodology for the North West London (NWL) Diabetes Foot Care Transformation project. DESCRIPTION: A mixed methods design including: i) a quasi-experimental quantitative analysis assessing the impact of the implementation of the local secondary care multi-disciplinary diabetes foot team clinics on service utilisation and clinical outcomes (amputations and number of healed patients); ii) a phenomenological, qualitative study to explore patient and staff experience; and iii) a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (pre and post 2017) to evaluate the programme cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Demonstrating the impact of multidisciplinary, integrated care models and the value of co-production approaches is important for health providers and commissioners trying to improve health outcome. Evaluation is also needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers which might have reduced the impact of the programme and key elements for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89927702022-04-26 Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation Palladino, Raffaele More, Ash Greenfield, Geva Anokye, Nana Pigott, Elizabeth Willis, Tony Edward, Gregg Majeed, Azeem Kong, Wing May Int J Integr Care Methodology Paper INTRODUCTION: Diabetes foot ulceration (DFU) presents an enormous burden to those living with diabetes and to the local health systems and economies. There is an increasing interest in implementing integrated care models to enhance the quality of care for people living with diabetes and related complications and the value of co-production approaches to achieve sustainable change. This paper aims to describe the evaluation methodology for the North West London (NWL) Diabetes Foot Care Transformation project. DESCRIPTION: A mixed methods design including: i) a quasi-experimental quantitative analysis assessing the impact of the implementation of the local secondary care multi-disciplinary diabetes foot team clinics on service utilisation and clinical outcomes (amputations and number of healed patients); ii) a phenomenological, qualitative study to explore patient and staff experience; and iii) a within-trial cost-effectiveness analysis (pre and post 2017) to evaluate the programme cost-effectiveness. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Demonstrating the impact of multidisciplinary, integrated care models and the value of co-production approaches is important for health providers and commissioners trying to improve health outcome. Evaluation is also needed to identify strategies to overcome barriers which might have reduced the impact of the programme and key elements for improvement. Ubiquity Press 2022-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8992770/ /pubmed/35480853 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5956 Text en Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Methodology Paper
Palladino, Raffaele
More, Ash
Greenfield, Geva
Anokye, Nana
Pigott, Elizabeth
Willis, Tony
Edward, Gregg
Majeed, Azeem
Kong, Wing May
Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title_full Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title_fullStr Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title_short Evaluation of the North West London Diabetes Foot Care Transformation Project: A Mixed-Methods Evaluation
title_sort evaluation of the north west london diabetes foot care transformation project: a mixed-methods evaluation
topic Methodology Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35480853
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/ijic.5956
work_keys_str_mv AT palladinoraffaele evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT moreash evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT greenfieldgeva evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT anokyenana evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT pigottelizabeth evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT willistony evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT edwardgregg evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT majeedazeem evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation
AT kongwingmay evaluationofthenorthwestlondondiabetesfootcaretransformationprojectamixedmethodsevaluation