Cargando…

Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study

PURPOSE: Investigate the impact of acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on single‐photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) image quality with the ultimate aim of finding the shortest possible acquisition time for clinical whole‐body SPECT/CT (WB‐SPECT/CT) while ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alqahtani, Mansour M., Willowson, Kathy P., Constable, Chris, Fulton, Roger, Kench, Peter L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13528
_version_ 1784683807550472192
author Alqahtani, Mansour M.
Willowson, Kathy P.
Constable, Chris
Fulton, Roger
Kench, Peter L.
author_facet Alqahtani, Mansour M.
Willowson, Kathy P.
Constable, Chris
Fulton, Roger
Kench, Peter L.
author_sort Alqahtani, Mansour M.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Investigate the impact of acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on single‐photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) image quality with the ultimate aim of finding the shortest possible acquisition time for clinical whole‐body SPECT/CT (WB‐SPECT/CT) while maintaining image quality METHODS: The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image quality measurements were performed on a SPECT/CT imaging system using a NEMA International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) phantom with spherical inserts of varying diameter (10–37 mm), filled with (99m)Tc in activity sphere‐to‐background concentration ratio of 8.5:1. A gated acquisition was acquired and binned data were summed to simulate acquisitions of 15, 8, and 3 s per projection angle. Images were reconstructed on a Hermes (HERMES Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden) workstation using eight subsets and between 4 and 24 iterations of the three‐dimensional (3D) ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. Reconstructed images were post‐smoothed with 3D Gaussian filter ranging from 0 to 12 mm full‐width at half maximum (FWHM). Contrast recovery, background variability, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio were evaluated RESULTS: As expected, the spheres were more clearly defined as acquisition time and count statistics improved. The optimal iteration number and Gaussian filter were determined from the contrast recovery convergence and level of noise. Convergence of contrast recovery was observed at eight iterations while 12 iterations yielded stabilized values at all acquisition times. In addition, it was observed that applying 3D Gaussian filter of 8–12 mm FWHM suppressed the noise and mitigated Gibbs artifacts. Background variability was larger for small spheres than larger spheres and the noise decreased when acquisition time became longer. A contrast‐to‐noise ratio >5 was reached for the two smallest spheres of 10 and 13 mm at acquisition times of 8 s CONCLUSION: Optimized reconstruction parameters preserved image quality with reduce acquisition time in present study. This study suggests an optimal protocol for clinical (99m)Tc SPECT/CT can be reached at 8 s per projection angle, with data reconstructed using 12 iterations and eight subset of the 3D OSEM algorithm and 8 mm Gaussian post‐filter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89929372022-04-13 Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study Alqahtani, Mansour M. Willowson, Kathy P. Constable, Chris Fulton, Roger Kench, Peter L. J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: Investigate the impact of acquisition time and reconstruction parameters on single‐photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) image quality with the ultimate aim of finding the shortest possible acquisition time for clinical whole‐body SPECT/CT (WB‐SPECT/CT) while maintaining image quality METHODS: The National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) image quality measurements were performed on a SPECT/CT imaging system using a NEMA International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) phantom with spherical inserts of varying diameter (10–37 mm), filled with (99m)Tc in activity sphere‐to‐background concentration ratio of 8.5:1. A gated acquisition was acquired and binned data were summed to simulate acquisitions of 15, 8, and 3 s per projection angle. Images were reconstructed on a Hermes (HERMES Medical Solutions AB, Stockholm, Sweden) workstation using eight subsets and between 4 and 24 iterations of the three‐dimensional (3D) ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm. Reconstructed images were post‐smoothed with 3D Gaussian filter ranging from 0 to 12 mm full‐width at half maximum (FWHM). Contrast recovery, background variability, and contrast‐to‐noise ratio were evaluated RESULTS: As expected, the spheres were more clearly defined as acquisition time and count statistics improved. The optimal iteration number and Gaussian filter were determined from the contrast recovery convergence and level of noise. Convergence of contrast recovery was observed at eight iterations while 12 iterations yielded stabilized values at all acquisition times. In addition, it was observed that applying 3D Gaussian filter of 8–12 mm FWHM suppressed the noise and mitigated Gibbs artifacts. Background variability was larger for small spheres than larger spheres and the noise decreased when acquisition time became longer. A contrast‐to‐noise ratio >5 was reached for the two smallest spheres of 10 and 13 mm at acquisition times of 8 s CONCLUSION: Optimized reconstruction parameters preserved image quality with reduce acquisition time in present study. This study suggests an optimal protocol for clinical (99m)Tc SPECT/CT can be reached at 8 s per projection angle, with data reconstructed using 12 iterations and eight subset of the 3D OSEM algorithm and 8 mm Gaussian post‐filter. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8992937/ /pubmed/35049129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13528 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Alqahtani, Mansour M.
Willowson, Kathy P.
Constable, Chris
Fulton, Roger
Kench, Peter L.
Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title_full Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title_fullStr Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title_short Optimization of (99m)Tc whole‐body SPECT/CT image quality: A phantom study
title_sort optimization of (99m)tc whole‐body spect/ct image quality: a phantom study
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13528
work_keys_str_mv AT alqahtanimansourm optimizationof99mtcwholebodyspectctimagequalityaphantomstudy
AT willowsonkathyp optimizationof99mtcwholebodyspectctimagequalityaphantomstudy
AT constablechris optimizationof99mtcwholebodyspectctimagequalityaphantomstudy
AT fultonroger optimizationof99mtcwholebodyspectctimagequalityaphantomstudy
AT kenchpeterl optimizationof99mtcwholebodyspectctimagequalityaphantomstudy