Cargando…

Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices

PURPOSE: To compare the intrafractional motion error (IME) during stereotactic irradiation (STI) in patients with brain metastases immobilized using open‐ (Encompass) and full‐face (DSPS) clamshell‐style immobilization devices. METHODS: Encompass (38 patients) and DSPS (38 patients) were used for pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ohira, Shingo, Komiyama, Riho, Kanayama, Naoyuki, Ueda, Yoshihiro, Inui, Shoki, Miyazaki, Masayoshi, Koizumi, Masahiko, Konishi, Koji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13536
_version_ 1784683809503969280
author Ohira, Shingo
Komiyama, Riho
Kanayama, Naoyuki
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Inui, Shoki
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Konishi, Koji
author_facet Ohira, Shingo
Komiyama, Riho
Kanayama, Naoyuki
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Inui, Shoki
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Konishi, Koji
author_sort Ohira, Shingo
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the intrafractional motion error (IME) during stereotactic irradiation (STI) in patients with brain metastases immobilized using open‐ (Encompass) and full‐face (DSPS) clamshell‐style immobilization devices. METHODS: Encompass (38 patients) and DSPS (38 patients) were used for patient immobilization, and HyperArc plans with three to four non‐coplanar beams were generated to deliver 25 to 35 Gy in three to five fractions. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed on patients before and after the treatment. Moreover, the difference in patient position between the two CBCT images was considered as the IME. The margins to compensate for IME were calculated using the van Herk margin formula. RESULTS: For Encompass, the mean values of IME in the translational setup were 0.1, 0.2, and 0.0 mm in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior, and left–right directions, respectively, and the mean values of IME about rotational axes were −0.1, 0.0, and 0.0° for the Pitch, Roll, and Yaw rotations, respectively. For DSPS, the mean values of IME in the translational setup were 0.2, 0.2, and 0.0 mm in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior, and left–right directions, respectively, and the mean values of IME about rotational axes were −0.1, −0.1, and 0.0° for the Pitch, Roll, and Yaw rotations, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the IME of the two immobilization systems except in the anterior–posterior direction (p = 0.02). Moreover, no statistically significant correlation was observed between three‐dimensional IME and treatment time. The margin compensation for IME was less than 1 mm for both immobilization devices. CONCLUSIONS: The IME during STI using open‐ and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices is approximately equal considering the adequate accuracy in patient positioning.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89929452022-04-13 Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices Ohira, Shingo Komiyama, Riho Kanayama, Naoyuki Ueda, Yoshihiro Inui, Shoki Miyazaki, Masayoshi Koizumi, Masahiko Konishi, Koji J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics PURPOSE: To compare the intrafractional motion error (IME) during stereotactic irradiation (STI) in patients with brain metastases immobilized using open‐ (Encompass) and full‐face (DSPS) clamshell‐style immobilization devices. METHODS: Encompass (38 patients) and DSPS (38 patients) were used for patient immobilization, and HyperArc plans with three to four non‐coplanar beams were generated to deliver 25 to 35 Gy in three to five fractions. Cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed on patients before and after the treatment. Moreover, the difference in patient position between the two CBCT images was considered as the IME. The margins to compensate for IME were calculated using the van Herk margin formula. RESULTS: For Encompass, the mean values of IME in the translational setup were 0.1, 0.2, and 0.0 mm in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior, and left–right directions, respectively, and the mean values of IME about rotational axes were −0.1, 0.0, and 0.0° for the Pitch, Roll, and Yaw rotations, respectively. For DSPS, the mean values of IME in the translational setup were 0.2, 0.2, and 0.0 mm in the anterior–posterior, superior–inferior, and left–right directions, respectively, and the mean values of IME about rotational axes were −0.1, −0.1, and 0.0° for the Pitch, Roll, and Yaw rotations, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between the IME of the two immobilization systems except in the anterior–posterior direction (p = 0.02). Moreover, no statistically significant correlation was observed between three‐dimensional IME and treatment time. The margin compensation for IME was less than 1 mm for both immobilization devices. CONCLUSIONS: The IME during STI using open‐ and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices is approximately equal considering the adequate accuracy in patient positioning. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8992945/ /pubmed/35049125 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13536 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Ohira, Shingo
Komiyama, Riho
Kanayama, Naoyuki
Ueda, Yoshihiro
Inui, Shoki
Miyazaki, Masayoshi
Koizumi, Masahiko
Konishi, Koji
Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title_full Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title_fullStr Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title_full_unstemmed Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title_short Intra‐fractional motion error during HyperArc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: Comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
title_sort intra‐fractional motion error during hyperarc stereotactic radiosurgery on patients with brain metastases: comparison of open and full‐face clamshell‐style immobilization devices
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35049125
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13536
work_keys_str_mv AT ohirashingo intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT komiyamariho intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT kanayamanaoyuki intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT uedayoshihiro intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT inuishoki intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT miyazakimasayoshi intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT koizumimasahiko intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices
AT konishikoji intrafractionalmotionerrorduringhyperarcstereotacticradiosurgeryonpatientswithbrainmetastasescomparisonofopenandfullfaceclamshellstyleimmobilizationdevices