Cargando…

Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation

PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a novel device for stereotactic breast treatments that employs 25 rotating Co‐60 sources while the patient is continuously translated in three axes to deliver a highly conformal dose to the target. There is no commercial software available for independent second calculations...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Leah, Becker, Stewart J., McAvoy, Sarah Anne, Nichols, Elizabeth M., Guerrero, Mariana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35132771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13524
_version_ 1784683811441737728
author Chen, Leah
Becker, Stewart J.
McAvoy, Sarah Anne
Nichols, Elizabeth M.
Guerrero, Mariana
author_facet Chen, Leah
Becker, Stewart J.
McAvoy, Sarah Anne
Nichols, Elizabeth M.
Guerrero, Mariana
author_sort Chen, Leah
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a novel device for stereotactic breast treatments that employs 25 rotating Co‐60 sources while the patient is continuously translated in three axes to deliver a highly conformal dose to the target. There is no commercial software available for independent second calculations. The purpose of this study is to determine an efficient way to estimate GammaPod treatment times based on target volume and use it as a second calculation for patient‐specific quality assurance. METHODS: Fifty‐nine GammaPod (Xcision Medical Systems, LLC.) breast cancer patient treatments were used as the fitting dataset for this study. Similar to the Curie‐seconds concept in brachytherapy, we considered dose‐rate × time/(prescribed dose) as a function of target volumes. Using a MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) script, we generated linear (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) and quadratic fits and tested the resulting equations on an additional set of 30 patients. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the dose‐rate × time/(prescribed dose) and patients’ target volumes for both the linear and quadratic models. The linear fit was selected for use and using the polyval function in MATLAB, a 95% CI graph was created to depict the accuracy of the prediction for treatment times. Testing the model on 30 additional patients with target volumes ranging from 20 to 188 cc yielded treatment times from 10 to 25 min that in all cases were within the predicted CI. The average absolute difference between the predicted and actual treatment times was 1.0 min (range 0–3.3 min). The average percent difference was 5.8% (range 0%–18.4%). CONCLUSION: This work has resulted in a viable independent calculation for GammaPod treatment times. This method has been implemented as a spreadsheet that is ready for clinical use to predict and verify the accuracy of breast cancer treatment times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89929532022-04-13 Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation Chen, Leah Becker, Stewart J. McAvoy, Sarah Anne Nichols, Elizabeth M. Guerrero, Mariana J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: The GammaPod is a novel device for stereotactic breast treatments that employs 25 rotating Co‐60 sources while the patient is continuously translated in three axes to deliver a highly conformal dose to the target. There is no commercial software available for independent second calculations. The purpose of this study is to determine an efficient way to estimate GammaPod treatment times based on target volume and use it as a second calculation for patient‐specific quality assurance. METHODS: Fifty‐nine GammaPod (Xcision Medical Systems, LLC.) breast cancer patient treatments were used as the fitting dataset for this study. Similar to the Curie‐seconds concept in brachytherapy, we considered dose‐rate × time/(prescribed dose) as a function of target volumes. Using a MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA) script, we generated linear (with 95% confidence interval (CI)) and quadratic fits and tested the resulting equations on an additional set of 30 patients. RESULTS: We found a strong correlation between the dose‐rate × time/(prescribed dose) and patients’ target volumes for both the linear and quadratic models. The linear fit was selected for use and using the polyval function in MATLAB, a 95% CI graph was created to depict the accuracy of the prediction for treatment times. Testing the model on 30 additional patients with target volumes ranging from 20 to 188 cc yielded treatment times from 10 to 25 min that in all cases were within the predicted CI. The average absolute difference between the predicted and actual treatment times was 1.0 min (range 0–3.3 min). The average percent difference was 5.8% (range 0%–18.4%). CONCLUSION: This work has resulted in a viable independent calculation for GammaPod treatment times. This method has been implemented as a spreadsheet that is ready for clinical use to predict and verify the accuracy of breast cancer treatment times. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC8992953/ /pubmed/35132771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13524 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Chen, Leah
Becker, Stewart J.
McAvoy, Sarah Anne
Nichols, Elizabeth M.
Guerrero, Mariana
Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title_full Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title_fullStr Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title_full_unstemmed Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title_short Correlation of treatment time to target volume for GammaPod treatments: A simple second calculation
title_sort correlation of treatment time to target volume for gammapod treatments: a simple second calculation
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35132771
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13524
work_keys_str_mv AT chenleah correlationoftreatmenttimetotargetvolumeforgammapodtreatmentsasimplesecondcalculation
AT beckerstewartj correlationoftreatmenttimetotargetvolumeforgammapodtreatmentsasimplesecondcalculation
AT mcavoysarahanne correlationoftreatmenttimetotargetvolumeforgammapodtreatmentsasimplesecondcalculation
AT nicholselizabethm correlationoftreatmenttimetotargetvolumeforgammapodtreatmentsasimplesecondcalculation
AT guerreromariana correlationoftreatmenttimetotargetvolumeforgammapodtreatmentsasimplesecondcalculation