Cargando…

An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard

PURPOSE: Complex data processing and curation for artificial intelligence applications rely on high‐quality data sets for training and analysis. Manually reviewing images and their associated annotations is a very laborious task and existing quality control tools for data review are generally limite...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gates, Evan D. H., Celaya, Adrian, Suki, Dima, Schellingerhout, Dawid, Fuentes, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35148034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13557
_version_ 1784683811671375872
author Gates, Evan D. H.
Celaya, Adrian
Suki, Dima
Schellingerhout, Dawid
Fuentes, David
author_facet Gates, Evan D. H.
Celaya, Adrian
Suki, Dima
Schellingerhout, Dawid
Fuentes, David
author_sort Gates, Evan D. H.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Complex data processing and curation for artificial intelligence applications rely on high‐quality data sets for training and analysis. Manually reviewing images and their associated annotations is a very laborious task and existing quality control tools for data review are generally limited to raw images only. The purpose of this work was to develop an imaging informatics dashboard for the easy and fast review of processed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data sets; we demonstrated its ability in a large‐scale data review. METHODS: We developed a custom R Shiny dashboard that displays key static snapshots of each imaging study and its annotations. A graphical interface allows the structured entry of review data and download of tabulated review results. We evaluated the dashboard using two large data sets: 1380 processed MR imaging studies from our institution and 285 studies from the 2018 MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS). RESULTS: Studies were reviewed at an average rate of 100/h using the dashboard, 10 times faster than using existing data viewers. For data from our institution, 1181 of the 1380 (86%) studies were of acceptable quality. The most commonly identified failure modes were tumor segmentation (9.6% of cases) and image registration (4.6% of cases). Tumor segmentation without visible errors on the dashboard had much better agreement with reference tumor volume measurements (root‐mean‐square error 12.2 cm(3)) than did segmentations with minor errors (20.5 cm(3)) or failed segmentations (27.4 cm(3)). In the BraTS data, 242 of 285 (85%) studies were acceptable quality after processing. Among the 43 cases that failed review, 14 had unacceptable raw image quality. CONCLUSION: Our dashboard provides a fast, effective tool for reviewing complex processed MR imaging data sets. It is freely available for download at https://github.com/EGates1/MRDQED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8992954
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-89929542022-04-13 An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard Gates, Evan D. H. Celaya, Adrian Suki, Dima Schellingerhout, Dawid Fuentes, David J Appl Clin Med Phys Technical Notes PURPOSE: Complex data processing and curation for artificial intelligence applications rely on high‐quality data sets for training and analysis. Manually reviewing images and their associated annotations is a very laborious task and existing quality control tools for data review are generally limited to raw images only. The purpose of this work was to develop an imaging informatics dashboard for the easy and fast review of processed magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data sets; we demonstrated its ability in a large‐scale data review. METHODS: We developed a custom R Shiny dashboard that displays key static snapshots of each imaging study and its annotations. A graphical interface allows the structured entry of review data and download of tabulated review results. We evaluated the dashboard using two large data sets: 1380 processed MR imaging studies from our institution and 285 studies from the 2018 MICCAI Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS). RESULTS: Studies were reviewed at an average rate of 100/h using the dashboard, 10 times faster than using existing data viewers. For data from our institution, 1181 of the 1380 (86%) studies were of acceptable quality. The most commonly identified failure modes were tumor segmentation (9.6% of cases) and image registration (4.6% of cases). Tumor segmentation without visible errors on the dashboard had much better agreement with reference tumor volume measurements (root‐mean‐square error 12.2 cm(3)) than did segmentations with minor errors (20.5 cm(3)) or failed segmentations (27.4 cm(3)). In the BraTS data, 242 of 285 (85%) studies were acceptable quality after processing. Among the 43 cases that failed review, 14 had unacceptable raw image quality. CONCLUSION: Our dashboard provides a fast, effective tool for reviewing complex processed MR imaging data sets. It is freely available for download at https://github.com/EGates1/MRDQED. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8992954/ /pubmed/35148034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13557 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Technical Notes
Gates, Evan D. H.
Celaya, Adrian
Suki, Dima
Schellingerhout, Dawid
Fuentes, David
An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title_full An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title_fullStr An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title_full_unstemmed An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title_short An efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
title_sort efficient magnetic resonance image data quality screening dashboard
topic Technical Notes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8992954/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35148034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13557
work_keys_str_mv AT gatesevandh anefficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT celayaadrian anefficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT sukidima anefficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT schellingerhoutdawid anefficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT fuentesdavid anefficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT gatesevandh efficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT celayaadrian efficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT sukidima efficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT schellingerhoutdawid efficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard
AT fuentesdavid efficientmagneticresonanceimagedataqualityscreeningdashboard