Comparative diagnostic utility of metagenomic next‐generation sequencing, GeneXpert, modified Ziehl–Neelsen staining, and culture using cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis: A multi‐center, retrospective study in China

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis (TBM) remains a great challenge during clinical practice. The diagnostic efficacies of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)‐based mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture, modified Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and metagenomic next‐...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuxin, Wang, Yuqing, Liu, Xiaojin, Li, Wen, Fu, Hongyi, Liu, Xinyan, Zhang, Xun, Zhou, Xueqin, Yang, Bingzhou, Yao, Jie, Ma, Xiaolei, Han, Lijun, Li, Huan, Zheng, Liheng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Research Articles
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8993600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35202495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.24307
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis (TBM) remains a great challenge during clinical practice. The diagnostic efficacies of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)‐based mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture, modified Ziehl–Neelsen (ZN) staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS) for TBM remained elusive. METHODS: A total of 216 adult patients with suspicious TBM were retrospectively enrolled in this multi‐cohort study. The diagnostic performances for MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS using CSF samples were evaluated. RESULTS: Uniform clinical case definition classified 88 (40.7%) out of 216 patients as the definite TBM, 5 (2.3%) patients as probable TBM cases, and 24 (11.1%) patients as possible TBM cases. The sensitivities of MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS for TBM diagnosis against consensus uniform case definition for definite TBM were 25.0%, 76.1%, 73.9%, and 84.1%, respectively. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were 66.0%, 85.9%, 84.8%, and 90.1%, respectively. The sensitivities of MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS for TBM diagnosis against consensus uniform case definition for definite, probable, and possible TBM were 18.8%, 57.3%, 55.5%, and 63.2%, respectively. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were 51.0%, 66.4%, 65.6%, and 69.7%, respectively. mNGS combined with modified ZN stain and Xpert could cover TBM cases against a composite microbiological reference standard, yielding 100% specificity and 100% NPV. CONCLUSION: Metagenomic next‐generation sequencing detected TBM with higher sensitivity than Xpert, ZN staining and MGIT culture, but mNGS cannot be used as a rule‐out test. mNGS combined with Xpert or modified ZN staining could enhance the sensitivity of diagnostic tests for TBM.

Ejemplares similares